Tag: Assassination

  • On Company Business – Full 1980 Documentary on the CIA by Allan Francovich

    On Company Business – Full 1980 Documentary on the CIA by Allan Francovich

    On Company Business is a 1980 documentary on the CIA by the late Allan Francovich. The documentary is a comprehensive look at the role of the CIA in various covert operations during and after WWII. The video covers several topics, including the economic rationale behind the Marshall Plan, the agency’s involvement in supporting democratic forces in Europe, and their use of front organizations to influence events in various countries. It also covers the tensions between Fidel Castro’s Cuba and the United States during the Cold War, the failed Bay of Pigs invasion, and the various assassination attempts against Castro.

    The documentary also delves into the CIA’s involvement in the assassination of Congo’s first Prime Minister, Patrice Lumumba, and how they attempted to assassinate him with poison. Throughout the video, former CIA officers discuss their experiences working for the agency, the risks involved, and the need for secrecy in their operations.

    The video also provides an in-depth look at the CIA and its involvement in Latin American politics during the Cold War. The CIA is shown to have assisted multinational corporations, engaged in propaganda and political warfare, trained labor organizers against communist movements, and supported military coups. Torture and assassination were also used in the agency’s efforts to combat communism, including the training of death squads and torture techniques in Latin America. The video also discusses specific incidents, such as the Bay of Pigs and the Chilean political situation, to illustrate the CIA’s activities during this period.

    In the last section the video discusses the CIA’s involvement in various foreign conflicts, including in Chile and Angola. It highlights the agency’s attempts to manipulate events to further American interests, often at the expense of human rights and democratic values. The documentary also delves into the relationship between the CIA and American news media, with evidence suggesting that the agency planted stories abroad that eventually made their way to the United States. The video presents various individuals, including former CIA agents, who express differing opinions on the agency’s actions and the ethics of clandestine operations. Overall, the documentary raises questions about the role and accountability of US intelligence agencies in shaping foreign policy and their impact on global relations.

    At 00:00:00 various individuals including former CIA agents discuss their experiences working for the CIA and the nature of its operations. They discuss covert tactics and weaponry such as poisons and electric guns. One former agent also speaks about being recruited under the guise of working for the Department of Defense before discovering that he was actually working for the CIA. Others discuss the risk of having a secret organization like the CIA, but highlight the necessity of having some sort of intelligence service. The documentary also touches on the history of covert operations during wartime.

    At 00:05:00 the video discusses the economic rationale behind the Marshall Plan and the CIA’s role in combatting left-wing political organizations in Europe that opposed the plan. After World War II, there was a fear that the return to unemployment of the depression could be averted only by creating foreign markets for overproduction. Thus, the Marshall Plan was established to provide economic support to the free nations of Europe. However, left-wing political parties in Europe, especially in France and Italy, who were the backbone of the resistance to fascism, opposed the plan, knowing that reconstruction would bring economic and political dependence on the United States. Consequently, the CIA was partly set up to combat on a political warfare basis against the efforts of these parties to impede the success of the Marshall Plan.

    At 00:10:00 the speaker discusses the CIA’s support of democratic forces in Europe and their opposition to fascist and right-wing groups. They also talk about the Cold War and how the fear of communist influence was widespread at the time, with Senator McCarthy fueling conspiracy theories about Soviet spies in the State Department. The speaker mentions that the institutions of power which are penetrated include political parties, security services, youth and student movements, cultural organizations, and even professional societies. To combat this, the CIA funded media outlets such as Radio Free Europe and Radio Liberty to spread the message of freedom and provide specific instructions for the Russian people on working towards their liberation under the noses of the Soviet secret police.

    At 00:15:00 it is discussed how the CIA used front organizations to influence events in various countries after World War II. Examples of organizations that were set up by the CIA include the World Assembly of Youth and Coordinating Secretariat of National Unions of Students, which were used to control and influence their members. The CIA also helped to found the International Confederation of Free Trade Unions. The video mentions Irving Brown, who received money from the CIA and distributed it to labor operations, and how the CIA provided financial aid to French unions during a general strike. Overall, the CIA’s involvement in supporting various organizations was considered patriotic during the 1950s.

    At 00:20:00 the documentary discusses the opposition that the communists had towards the Marshall Plan, which was providing economic aid to support freedom and France. The communists attempted to defeat the plan via political strikes called by trade unions and political elements. The US government consequently called upon Irby Brown and Jacob Stone to break the strikes, and they used the help of the Corsican mafia, particularly the racketeer name Fairy Pazhani, who ended up becoming a paid agent of Central Intelligence. The documentary also mentions a conversation between the acting labor attache and George Meany, the Secretary of the American Federation of Labor, where the former gave his views on how unpopular Irving Dunne was and how much damage he was doing to free labor and discrediting people.

    At 00:25:00 it is revealed that the purpose of political and front organizations in Europe after World War II was to fill the political vacuum with forces that would be favorable to close relations with the United States and to preclude any left-wing participation in political life. This was achieved through support for anti-communist movements, intervention in the affairs of other countries, and the support of half-assed dictators, military print, or oligarchy that promised to maintain the status quo beneficial to the interests of the United States and its corporations.

    At 00:30:00 the documentary delves into the tensions between Fidel Castro’s Cuba and the United States during the Cold War. The US government was concerned with the spread of communism, and viewed Fidel Castro as a threat to its interests. However, some within the CIA believed that the US should not be attempting to overthrow or assassinate national liberation leaders like Castro, but rather work with them. Nonetheless, tensions boiled over when Castro announced the expropriation of US-owned property in Cuba, leading to a break in diplomatic relations and the events that followed. The documentary explores the CIA’s involvement in various operations to undermine and overthrow Castro, including the attempted assassination and sabotage.

    At 00:35:00 of the CIA documentary, the necessity of keeping operations secret from public debate is discussed, citing the infamous Bay of Pigs fiasco as an example of when a lack of secrecy led to failure. The documentary includes footage and accounts of the failed invasion of Cuba by human revolutionary troops and the heated denials of aggression made by the US. A former CIA officer stationed in Cuba recounts his personal connections with some of the participants of the Bay of Pigs landing force and his recommendation of individuals for the operation. The epilogue shows exiled family members desperately seeking news of their loved ones while Fidel Castro threatens death for the invaders and President Kennedy seeks bipartisan support for the situation.

    At 00:40:00 several individuals discuss the possibility of President Kennedy and Bobby Kennedy knowing about assassination plans against Fidel Castro. While there is no definitive answer, it is clear that many high-level officials within the U.S. government were aware of the constant actions being taken against Cuba, including attempts to blow up power plants and sugar mills. However, no one in the government approved of any CIA-led assassinations, and the head of the agency at that time stated that he had no knowledge of such plans. It is unlikely that any President would overtly order an assassination, but rather issue non-directed orders to solve problems in Cuba.

    At 00:45:00 the video discusses various attempts by the CIA to get rid of Fidel Castro, including the involvement of organized crime figures such as John Roselli and Sam Giancana. It is revealed that William K. Harvey was in touch with Roselli during an alleged plot to transport poison pills from Florida to Havana; though there was no evidence that this plot ever materialized. Meanwhile, the CIA’s involvement in operations such as these typically did not extend beyond the planning stage, with the work being carried out by contract agents, gangsters, and mercenaries. However, there are reports that at the time of JFK’s assassination a CIA officer was meeting with a Cuban agent in Paris to provide an assassination device to kill Castro.

    At 00:50:00 there is a discussion about the CIA’s involvement in potentially attempting to assassinate Fidel Castro, using methods like giving an agent a device that kills. The committee questions the morality and safety of such covert operations, especially when involving dangerous organizations like the Mafia. The CIAers are quick to note that it is a tricky business, involving evaluations by good intelligence officers and policymakers. The video also shows some historical events, such as the capture of former Congo premier Patrice Lumumba and the CIA’s training camp at Camp Perry.

    At 00:55:00 former CIA officers discuss the agency’s involvement in the assassination of Congo’s first Prime Minister, Patrice Lumumba, and how they attempted to assassinate him with poison. The operation ultimately failed, and the CIA resorted to convincing Mobutu to have Lumumba killed. The officers also explain how the agency recruited and worked with agents, including how they sometimes targeted people who were a little devious. They also discussed the risks for intelligence officers who attempt to recruit assets to serve the interests of the US rather than their own country.

    At 01:00:00 the speaker discusses how the CIA would check the names of potential Venezuelan employees of Creole Petroleum Company against their computerized files for any indication of left-wing political sympathies or membership. This was an example of the CIA assisting a multinational corporation. The CIA was also engaged in propaganda and political warfare throughout Latin America to create the optimum operating conditions for multinational corporations. They created fear and hysteria around the growth of left-wing political organizations, such as the communist organizations, and used forged and false documents to bring about a timely effect in certain areas.

    At 01:05:00 a CIA officer talks about how they planted a report in a toothpaste tube to frame a left-wing organization leader who had gone to Cuba on a trip. The planted report in the toothpaste tube was found by the authorities in his luggage upon his return, which led to his immediate arrest and the eventual establishment of a military Quinta. Additionally, the video discusses the CIA’s efforts to drum up support for the Venezuelan charge that Castro was supplying arms to guerrillas in Venezuela by influencing the Argentine government. The video also talks about Kennedy’s policy towards Cuba and how the issue between communism and democracy will eventually be settled by the ordinary working people of different nations.

    At 01:10:00 a man who worked for the CIA recounts how he was called to Washington and interviewed for a position in Brazil. His position was supposedly going to be for a phony organization known as the Postal Telegraph California International, which was later revealed as being under the CIA. He was trained on how to organize against communists, and he eventually became fanatical about it. He was later accused of collaborating with the CIA and did not provide a response to the accusation.

    At 01:15:00 it is revealed that the American Institute for Free Labor Development was established during the Kennedy period, and it was a joint venture between American trade unions and multinational corporations operating in Latin America. The organization’s cover was education and social projects like developing cooperatives and housing, but the real reason was to create organizers who could go back to their industries and spend time doing nothing but organizing. The organization trained Democratic trade unionists, and it was hoped that they could go back to their respective countries and put into practice some of the things that they learned. However, the organization’s board of directors had prominent American employers, such as Peter Grace, and the list of corporations that contributed included American corporations that had never paid decent wages or provided good working conditions in the United States.

    At 01:20:00 it is discussed how the CIA would train and support labor organizers in Latin American countries to turn against the communist movements and prevent them from taking over unions and other organizations. The training included sending people to Front Royal for courses on organizing. The efforts resulted in the overthrow of the Gula regime in Brazil, and the CIA’s involvement was suspected by both the communists and their opponents. The AFL-CIO denied receiving any money from the CIA, and the organization’s books were open to the public. The CIA did not want any records kept to avoid any information leaks.

    At 01:25:00of the CIA documentary, it is revealed that the organization led a propaganda campaign and disinformation strategy in Brazil to justify a military coup in 1964. The campaign emphasized the threat of communism and rallied support from women and religious groups. The CIA also supported the coup by providing arms and even naval assistance. The exiled Brazilian president, João Goulart, had sympathies with Fidel Castro and his regime was ultimately overthrown by a bloodless military coup. Many Communist supporters were jailed and eliminated from the labor movement, while the Brazilian economy suffered as a result of the regime change.

    At 01:30:00 of the video, the Bay of Pigs is mentioned as a turning point in the CIA’s involvement in training and expanding foreign police forces to fight communism. Byron Angle, a member of the CIA at the time, was recruited to expand and lead this program. A third of the police training was devoted to making them aware of the communist menace. As a result, many countries’ police forces ended up using torture, including methods learned from the United States, when interrogating suspected communists. Victims, including political exiles in Europe, reported being tortured with US Army Field telephones, and they were often subjected to cruel forms of torture with no embarrassment from the torturers.

    At 01:35:00 the video discusses the use of torture as a means of interrogation during the Cold War and its ineffectiveness in getting information. The CIA officer interviewed explains that torture is a necessity in the system due to the continued resistance of leftist groups. The video also covers the unsuccessful attempts of the CIA to weaken the left in Uruguay during the 1960s and the promotion of repression during that period. The video then details the story of Dan Mitrione, a CIA officer who worked in Uruguay to improve police intelligence capabilities. Mitrione’s use of torture as an interrogation technique, such as the use of thin wires, is described in detail.

    At 01:40:00 it is revealed that the agency was involved in the training of death squads and torture techniques in Latin America during the 1970s. The program school in Los Fresnos, Texas was used to train students from Latin America how to construct bombs and destroy radio stations and cars, with the CIA running the courses. The agency also maintained a subversive control watchlist that included detailed information on left-wing political activists, which would be handed over to local police or military authorities for action. The death squads were then sent to Argentina where several leaders were kidnapped and assassinated, including Hector Gutierrez and Senator Selmeri Collini, prompting the victims’ families to register with police and flee the country.

    At 01:45:00 it is revealed that the murder of political leaders in Uruguay, including Mitrione, was part of an international campaign that included assassinations of political figures in Chile, Bolivia, and Europe. Mitrione’s presence and actions in Uruguay were part of a CIA advisory program that led to an increase in torture and brutality. Mitrione was eventually kidnapped and killed, and while the US government denied involvement, the murder highlighted the inhumanity of terrorism.

    At 01:50:00 the video discusses the CIA’s involvement in Chile during the 1960s and 1970s. The CIA provided millions of dollars in assistance to various political parties to strengthen them against the agenda supported by Castro. The goal was to prevent IND from being elected president of Chile in 1964 and to elect the Christian Democrats instead. However, after IND was elected in 1970, the CIA launched a plot to stop his inauguration and offered $250,000 for a constitutional ploy to block his election. Nixon ordered the CIA to proceed with the plot with the Chilean military to try to thwart the inauguration of IND.

    At 01:55:00 the speaker discusses his efforts to prevent a plot with the Chilean military, which included sending cables to the White House and State Department. The speaker discovered that the CIA had countermanded his specific orders and was secretly plotting with an extreme right-wing group called Patria Libertad, which had been put off limits by him. He also speaks of his meeting with Kissinger and the President where he accidentally touched a sensitive nerve and learned of a plot to eliminate certain individuals in Chile. The speaker suggests that the Chile situation warrants high priority for the entire administration, and everything should be done quietly.

    At 02:00:00 of the documentary, it is discussed how the CIA attempted to create a financial squeeze on Chile, preventing the government from governing efficiently. By financing truck drivers, the CIA created conditions that would lead to right-wing military leaders intervening, restoring national order, and appealing to those who seek peace. However, this peace is often the peace of the grave for many people, and it didn’t deter Chilean President Allende from standing up for the will of the majority of Chile.

    At 02:05:00 the video provides a collection of transcripts that detail the events surrounding the coup against Salvador Allende’s government in Chile. Orlando Letelier, a former Chilean ambassador to the US, recounts how he was informed of the coup in the early morning hours and how the military demanded that Allende surrender. The video also features commentary from US officials who express regret for the loss of life in Chile but also express that the coup was an internal affair. The aftermath of the coup is also explored, including the torture of hundreds of people in the Air Force Academy basement.

    At 02:10:00 various individuals discuss the dilemma faced by those involved in clandestine CIA operations in Latin America, as well as the potential conflict between US and Latin American interests. The video also features a clip of former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger testifying about US policy towards Chile during a period of political unrest. The Americans defend their actions as being in the national interest, but there is growing public concern and moral dilemmas regarding the ethics of such actions.

    At 02:15:00 of the CIA documentary, excerpts of interviews and congressional hearings are shown discussing the oversight function of the US Congress. It is revealed that the Congress had failed in its duty to oversee the executive branch of government and, in particular, the CIA. Various committees and subcommittees of Congress were tasked with oversight of the intelligence community and its operations. However, it was common practice for the intelligence community to brief only specific members of Congress rather than the entire committee, and often they would not pass on the information to the full committee. Some senators even expressed that they did not want to know certain things. Despite this, the CIA continued to involve itself in foreign conflicts, such as by flying arms to Angola, which would lead to further criticism of the agency.

    At 02:20:00 several individuals are questioned about the possible involvement of the United States in the war in Angola. While some deny any knowledge, others admit to receiving CIA funds and support for their activities in Angola. The legality of this involvement is called into question, as the War Powers Act requires that Congress be informed before the commitment of the United States Armed Forces, including paramilitary or other forces, in such activities abroad. Despite this, it appears that the CIA has been recruiting mercenaries and providing them with weapons and training. The reasons for US involvement in Angola are also discussed, including the old Cold War rationale of stopping the Soviet tide and supporting allies who have assisted US policies in other parts of the world.

    At 02:25:00 the documentary details the United States’ involvement in Angola and their fear of Soviet and Cuban influence in the region. The CIA spread false stories about Cubans raping Angolan women to generate support for their efforts in the country. While the CIA was coordinating with South Africa, they were almost helpless against the MPLA, and after an attack by Mobutu’s spare commanders, the United States’ effort was out of business. Senator Clark was sent to Africa to confer with southern African heads of state, and the CIA attempted to control the narrative by ordering their chief of station to prepare Mobutu and the FNLA president on what they should and should not say about the situation in Angola.

    At 02:30:00 the video describes how the CIA attempted to save face after spending millions of dollars on the Angola conflict. The agency could not provide further funding due to public opinion, leaving the soldiers without support. The families of those involved had difficulty receiving help from the US government, as officials claimed that these actions were not part of official policy. The former soldiers and their families expressed their disappointment in how the government handled the situation.

    At 02:35:00 the issue of the CIA’s influence on American news media is discussed, with clear indications that the agency planted stories abroad that eventually made its way to the United States. The chairman questions if the CIA paid people who worked in American journals or for television networks. The head of CBS at that time confirmed that certain relationships had already been established with the CIA and that using CIA agents as sources of information was useful for assessing world conditions. However, the risk of being viewed with disfavor by the public is high now for reporters who work with the CIA to influence American news. The Church Committee was infiltrated by CIA people, and abuses were ordered by presidents, not just the CIA. The main argument is that the CIA is just an instrument for policy execution, and the people who determine US foreign policy are the ones who call upon the CIA and other agencies to execute that policy.

    At 02:40:00 the speaker discusses how the CIA consistently maintained relationships with various security services in countries such as Iran, Chile, Brazil, and Uruguay, even though the human rights violations committed by these security services were publicly known. The speaker argues that these institutional relationships continue to some extent and that they must be stopped for real progress on human rights issues. Additionally, the speaker criticizes the actions of ex-CIA agent Philip Agee, who published a book containing the names of CIA agents and their addresses, calling for them to be punished for violating their agreements to keep classified information confidential. Overall, the speaker opposes secret intervention and subversion abroad and believes that individuals must fight against it.

    At 02:45:00 a former CIA agent denies any involvement in the killing of Richard Welch and explains that Welch was not killed because of his name or nationality, but rather due to the CIA’s history of destabilizing efforts towards socialism and progress in countries like Greece. The agent discusses the CIA’s promotion of dictators and suppression of human rights in various nations, citing Iran as an example where he believes the United States has benefited from its relationship with the Shah. However, he also acknowledges that the Iranian people may not have shared the same view and that the propaganda coming from the regime was not necessarily reflective of reality.

    At 02:50:00 retired CIA officer Stansfield Turner discusses the agency’s involvement in Iran during the Shah’s regime. Turner recounts how the CIA was instrumental in organizing the Iranian internal security police, known as SAVAK, which was well-documented as using torture to suppress political dissidents. He notes that the Iranian people are fully aware of the CIA’s role in creating SAVAK and how this has caused rage and anger towards the US. Turner then takes an oath pledging to support and defend the US Constitution.

    Odysee Video

  • John F. Kennedy Jr. Assassination Documentary by John Hankey

    John F. Kennedy Jr. Assassination Documentary by John Hankey

    Created by by John Hankey, this John F. Kennedy Jr. assassination documentary explores various theories surrounding his untimely death, including the possibility that it was orchestrated by those responsible for the assassination of his father and uncle.

    The video discusses the discrepancies in the timeline of JFK Jr.’s plane disappearance and the lies and deception surrounding the search and rescue mission. Additionally, a possible connection to the Bush family is explored, and doubts are raised about claims made by “the family” regarding JFK Jr’s flight license and the presence of a flight instructor on his plane.

    The video challenges the official narrative surrounding the crash and presents evidence to suggest that there may be more to the story than what was reported.

    00:00:00

    In this section, the video discusses the Kennedy family’s history of opposing the military-industrial complex that was seeking to take over the government and end democracy, and how many of them were killed as a result. Joe, the eldest son, died fighting Nazis in Germany, while Jack died fighting the Nazis in the US. John F. Kennedy Sr. opposed the Vietnam War, an excuse for the military-industrial complex to loot the US treasury, and was subsequently assassinated.

    Bobby Kennedy continued the fight against the military-industrial complex and was murdered after winning the California primary for the presidency. The murder was blamed on a lone nut, Sirhan Sirhan, but the coroner concluded that the fatal shot was fired from within one inch of Kennedy’s head, indicating the possibility of mind control and a decoy to divert attention from the real killer.

    00:05:00

    In this section, the video highlights John F. Kennedy Jr.’s life and work, explaining that he was not just a “harmless boob” but instead someone who fought for the truth and the interests of the people. His magazine, George, was a platform for smart and real infotainment, which sometimes included dangerous articles that exposed the corruption of the powerful, such as Oliver Stone’s piece on political assassinations.

    Due to his potential to win political office, some believed that John’s death was orchestrated by his father’s killers, who feared that he would go after them. In addition, the video suggests that the presence of Mossad agents in the United States before his death was not a coincidence but was related to the visit of Israeli Prime Minister Ahud Barak.

    00:10:00

    In this section of the JFK Jr assassination documentary, John Hankey presents the idea that George W. Bush and his father George H. W. Bush are prime suspects in the death of John Kennedy Jr. due to their involvement in the assassination of President Kennedy in 1963.

    John Hankey claims that after John’s death, George W. Bush lost in the New Hampshire primaries, but instead of the usual reactions, he received a significant increase in financial support, allowing him to smear McCain’s image and spread false rumors.

    John Hankey asks why the establishment would overwhelmingly support Bush instead of siding with McCain, and postulates that they needed someone they could trust to assist them in executing the murder of three thousand Americans so that they could steal billions from the national treasury.

    John Hankey also notes that George W. Bush was nowhere to be found when reporters asked for his response to the death of John Jr. and emphasizes that John was a responsible, intelligent, and good-hearted person, a stark contrast to the portrayal of him as an irresponsible drug user in some media reports.

    00:15:00

    In this section of the documentary, John Hankey questions how John F. Kennedy Jr., who was known for being a cautious and responsible pilot, could have ended up crashing into the ocean and killing himself, his wife, his sister-in-law, and possibly his unborn child.

    The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) investigated the crash and found no evidence of mechanical problems or bad weather conditions. The radar report showed that the plane suddenly dropped as if someone had grabbed the controls and pushed them forward, leading some to believe it was a suicide.

    However, there were indications that JFK Jr. was looking forward to fatherhood and had expressed optimism about his magazine’s future. The documentary also notes that the last few moments of the flight followed standard procedures until the sudden and unexplained dive into the water.

    00:20:00

    In this section, officials describe JFK Jr.’s final communication with the FAA as being at 9:39 pm on its final approach to Martha’s Vineyard, which requires the plane to pause at 2,500 feet, contact the tower, and receive permission to continue.

    This is consistent with radar information reconstructed by the NTSB that was used to explain the plane’s last moments before crashing. FAA regulations require the agency to begin searching for a plane anytime it descends below 100 feet, and a search should have been started at 9:40 pm, five minutes after JFK Jr.’s final contact with the tower. However, reports show that the FAA and the Coast Guard went silent and the Pentagon took over news reporting, indicating a possible cover-up.

    00:25:00

    In this section, the video talks about discrepancies in the timeline of the events that occurred before and after the disappearance of JFK Jr.’s plane. The official coast guard spokesman reported that JFK Jr.’s plane was late in arriving at Martha’s Vineyard, but this report was later washed away.

    Friends of Lauren Bessette, JFK Jr.’s sister-in-law, were expecting her at the airport at 9:30 pm, yet no one reported the plane missing until 2 am. FAA officials did nothing when contacted and even caused a U.S senator’s attempts to help correct the situation to be pointless. The reporters who tried to question these discrepancies were shut off from asking any further questions by the Pentagon who took over press coverage.

    00:30:00

    In this section, it is revealed that the Kennedy family first called the Coast Guard instead of the FAA to search for JFK Jr.’s plane. The Coast Guard contacted the FAA, which then contacted the Air Force. The Air Force then informed the Coast Guard that they were now in charge, sent them on a wild goose chase, and did nothing for five hours.

    Eventually, Clinton was woken up and threatened to fire everyone in the Air Force if a search wasn’t underway within 15 minutes. Eventually, two planes and two helicopters were sent to search a 20,000 square miles area of the ocean. The FAA, however, did conduct some analytical work, including the NTAP radar analysis, which showed that the plane had gone down on the western approach to Martha’s Vineyard.

    00:35:00

    In this section, the video discusses the lies and deception surrounding the search and rescue mission for John F. Kennedy Jr.’s plane after it went down. Colonel Steve Rourke, a helicopter pilot and former director of the Air Force rescue coordination center, was present at the rescue coordination center and lied about the search progress, even though he was intimately familiar with the radar tapes and end taps.

    The video suggests that the military purposely kept the rescue craft out of the crash area, and they lost many crucial pieces of information. The emergency beacon or ELT that all civil aircraft is required to carry was activated and received via a network of satellites, but this information was not passed on to the rescue teams in the Coast Guard and the Civil Air Patrol. The video raises questions as to why the military and others involved in the rescue mission did not want the searches to know where to search.

    00:40:00

    In this section, the video highlights evidence of a concerted effort by the upper levels of the Air Force and FAA to prevent the search and rescue teams from locating the crash site of John F. Kennedy Jr.’s plane as long as possible. The bad guys created a false picture of JFK Jr. being an incompetent and careless pilot by manipulating events and hiding crucial information.

    The missing pieces include the missing flight plan, all of Kennedy’s communication with the radar facilities along the route of his flight, and the battery of the plane’s cockpit recorder that preserved the final moments of the flight. Additionally, witnesses saw JFK Jr. talking on the phone before he took off, which raises questions about who he was talking to and what they were talking about. All these missing pieces could be part of the conspiracy to hide certain facts about the case.

    00:45:00

    In this section of the video, the speaker discusses the missing phone records and the intact aquamarine duffel bag discovered among the debris from the crash. The bag was assumed to contain John Kennedy Jr.’s flight log, which records who was on the plane.

    The flight log and who was on the plane are crucial because insurance companies use them to determine whose policy they have to pay out on. The speaker emphasizes the importance of believing the earliest reports from accurate and credible witnesses rather than unsubstantiated ones that come later. The speaker also challenges the claim that John did not have the proper license to fly the plane, and explains that he was a qualified pilot.

    00:50:00

    In this section of the video, John Hankey raises doubts about the claims made by “the family” regarding JFK Jr’s flight license and the presence of a flight instructor on his plane. While “the family” suggests that JFK Jr did not have the proper license to fly without a flight instructor, John Hankey argues that JFK Jr was legal to fly under visual flight rules.

    John Hankey also notes that JFK Jr had always flown with a flight instructor in the past, and had recently acquired a powerful new plane that required additional training. Witnesses report that JFK Jr, his wife Carolyn, and sister-in-law Lauren Bessette waited for 45 minutes at the airport before taking off, leading John Hankey to suggest that they may have been waiting for the flight instructor to arrive.

    00:55:00

    In this section, the video analyzes allegations surrounding JFK Jr.’s decision to have a flight instructor on his plane. Kennedy had passed his performance evaluation and written exam, but he needed to log hours, and because of his broken foot, which had the cast taken off the previous day, many people were worried about him flying alone.

    Reports claim that he told Canadian business associates that he preferred to fly with a co-pilot, and his friend and co-editor at George magazine confirmed that he was flying with an instructor. Although this hasn’t been officially confirmed, the evidence supporting this theory is abundant. The video questions why this theory was thrown away in favor of ones that couldn’t be verified.

    01:00:00

    In this section, the documentary delves into the inconsistencies in the official reports of JFK Jr.’s tragic plane crash. It appears that there were attempts to cover up some aspects of the case. For example, a group calling themselves “the Family” infiltrated the Dallas police and spread baseless stories about JFK Jr.’s lack of a necessary flying license and the absence of a flight instructor.

    The documentary questions why the media readily accepted these baseless stories. Additionally, the final report of the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) featured a dramatic story that one of JFK Jr.’s flight instructors had offered to fly with him, but Kennedy declined, wanting to fly alone. The documentary examines the origin of this story and the problematic interview process between the NTSB and JFK Jr.’s flight instructor, in which an essential part of their conversation seemed to have gone missing.

    01:05:00

    In this section of the video, the speaker questions the inconsistencies in the NTSB investigation report of John F. Kennedy Jr’s plane crash, particularly regarding the supposed last conversation between JFK Jr and his friend, Michael Morena. Morena’s claim, although proven false by his own lawyer, was still included in the final report and covered by the media.

    The speaker believes that this was a deliberate move by the “bad guys” to manipulate the news and hide the presence of a flight instructor on the plane, who they may have intentionally delayed rescue efforts for so they could recover the body and alter the wounds of JFK Jr’s father. The presence of an unseen hand is evident to the speaker, proving that there was a cover-up.

    01:10:00

    In this section of the video, the focus is on the fuel selector valve found in the off position when John F. Kennedy Jr.’s plane went into a headfirst disastrous plunge towards the sea leading to his death. The video explains that an airplane fuel selector valve is used for distributing the weight of the gasoline evenly on the plane during the flight, which is important to keep the weight evenly distributed.

    The video discusses how the fuel selector valve found in the off position is strange and mind-boggling, and how it is impossible for John or someone on the plane to have randomly fiddled with the valve. The video also explains how an engine failure alone would not cause a plane to make that kind of spectacular dive, and how the idea that John turned off the fuel selector valve is not plausible.

    01:15:00

    In this section, the importance of the fuel selector valve and its safety features on airplanes is explained. The valve has an off position that can only be turned off in an emergency situation by holding down a special button while simultaneously turning the valve. Although it is a safety feature, it is impossible to accidentally turn off.

    The fact that the valve in John Kennedy Jr.’s plane was in the off position is seen as suspicious and raises questions about how it could have happened. The article also discusses the radar analysis of the crash and suggests that someone on the plane may have intentionally crashed it by grabbing the controls and pushing them forward. The question of why the NTSB did not pursue this possibility further is also raised.

    01:20:00

    In this section of the video, the speaker ponders the idea that someone on JFK Jr.’s plane may have committed murder-suicide and purposely turned off the fuel valve.

    The speaker talks to a flight instructor who tells him that strange things can happen, and mentions another tragic event where a maniac pilot turned off the fuel valve causing a plane to plunge into the ocean, killing 217 people. However, there are alternative theories regarding what happened to this particular flight, including the possibility of the pilot being a Manchurian candidate and being programmed to commit the murder-suicide.

    01:25:00

    In this section of the video, John Hankey discusses the idea of mind control and how it has been utilized by the CIA for the past 50 years under the name MK Ultra. This program aimed to create “Manchurian candidates” or individuals who would be programmed to carry out political assassinations without remembering anything about their programming.

    John Hankey suggests that many high-profile assassinations, such as those of JFK, Bobby Kennedy, and John Lennon, may have been carried out by Manchurian candidates. John Hankey then questions the likelihood of two separate pilots from two different countries both deciding to commit suicide by crashing their planes and then turning off the fuel valves. This coincidence is deemed highly unlikely, leading John Hankey to suggest that the pilots may have been programmed by the same people who carried out the Manchurian candidate experiments.

    01:30:00

    In this section, the speaker reflects on the reason for their search and their hope for evidence to develop a theory that would explain the facts of the JFK Jr. assassination in a manner that wasn’t ridiculous. He compares the incomplete evidence of the assassination with the incomplete evidence of Galileo’s theory of the solar system, which over time became widely accepted even though it was not fully provable.

    The speaker then puts forward the theory that the flight instructor on JFK Jr.’s plane was programmed to crash it into the sea, which is supported by all the evidence available. This theory, he argues, is more reasonable and makes more sense than the NTSB’s theory that an experienced pilot crashed the plane for no reason.

    The speaker also suggests the plan was to commit the perfect crime and whisk JFK Jr.’s body away, but the bad guys messed it up by delaying the search and rescue mission. The evidence for this delay lies in the fact that the end tap location was withheld from the coast guard and the civil air patrol for 15 hours.

    01:35:00

    In this section of the video, the evidence is reviewed and presented as a two-step process for bringing charges against George W. Bush for the death of John F. Kennedy Jr. The evidence includes JFK Jr’s potential to seek high government office and his real threat to those who had killed his father, the oral mafia support earned by Bush Sr. for participating in JFK Sr.’s murder, and Bush Jr.’s own place at the table with the mafia.

    The evidence also suggests that the dark lord supported Bush Jr. over John McCain, the FAA ignoring Senator Kennedy, and the lies of Colonel Rourke. Bush Jr. would need to provide a reasonable alternative explanation for these events and his whereabouts on July 16th, 1999, but he doesn’t have one.

    01:40:00

    In this section of the video, the speaker discusses the need for George Bush to provide a credible alibi for the weekend that John Kennedy Jr.’s plane crashed. The speaker suggests that if Bush’s alibi is proved to be a lie, he will be convicted just like any other person accused of murder based on circumstantial evidence.

    The speaker goes on to discuss the sick, criminal mafia that has been infesting the United States and the world, responsible for everything from state-sponsored race-based slavery to the Vietnam War. The speaker urges viewers to fight this dehumanization and take action, stating that they are soldiers on the front line in a war for the very future of humanity.

    YouTube Video

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A4fSlhNqoL0