Tag: CIA

  • Documentary About How Jeffrey Epstein Struck Questionable Plea Deal with Alex Acosta

    Documentary About How Jeffrey Epstein Struck Questionable Plea Deal with Alex Acosta

    The YouTube video “How Jeffrey Epstein Got Away With It” explores the story behind Jeffrey Epstein’s examination, trial, and conviction for federal sex trafficking involving minors. The video highlights the questionable plea deal struck with Epstein by Alex Acosta, the Chief Federal Prosecutor for Southern Florida, and the implications it had on the justice system. The documentary also examines the case from the perspective of intelligence agencies, particularly the CIA and Israel’s Mossad, and their alleged involvement in it. The video raises questions about the circumstances surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s death in 2019 and suggests alternative explanations for it.

    Acosta was the Chief Federal Prosecutor for Southern Florida from 2005 to 2009, and his job was to ensure that criminals went to jail. He was portrayed as a person of integrity and an honorable guy, who caught the attention of former president Donald Trump. However, he refused to answer questions during his Senate confirmation hearing for the Secretary of Labor position, and the Senate was concerned about a particular case involving Jeffrey Epstein.

    Jeffrey Epstein was a friend of presidents and high-profile lawyers who was arrested on new sex trafficking charges and waiting trial for federal sex trafficking involving minors. Acosta gave Epstein the plea deal of the century, which excused underage sex trafficking, and allowed Epstein to walk free.

    When Acosta was being interviewed for the job of Trump’s labor secretary, he was asked about the questionable plea deal, and he said that he was ordered to stand down immediately because Epstein belonged to intelligence. The current US Attorney General cannot order a US Attorney to stand down unless he is elected by someone who is not part of the judiciary.

    According to Nick Bryan, an expert reporter on the Epstein case, only the president or the Attorney General has the power to order a US attorney to stand down. There have been four presidential administrations that have covered up the Jeffrey Epstein case, and now, the Biden Administration is covering it up. The American government is aiding the embedding of child trafficking by not investigating Jeffrey Epstein.

    The evidence potentially connects Jeffrey Epstein to the CIA and Israel’s Mossad intelligence agency. The film highlights how it was possible for one man to be protected and supported by the entire US government and how Epstein’s lawyers at Morgan and Morgan fight to give victims the best shot at compensation.

    The film also discusses how lawsuits can be expensive but that victims of abuse can receive compensation with the help of law firms. The film explains how Epstein’s case was yanked away from the Palm Beach Police Department and given to a grand jury, where a special prosecutor was responsible for showing the grand jurors the evidence necessary. However, the film argues that the grand jury was corrupt and that the special prosecutor, Barry Cromwell, called only one victim and skewed her credibility.

    The speaker then discusses the background of Jeffrey Epstein and how his victims were repeatedly molested and became addicted to drugs. The system in place allowed the perps to go unpunished once they became “unmarketable” and their damaged credibility would compromise them.

    When the grand jury didn’t indict Epstein on a single count of child abuse, the Palm Beach Police Department and its chief Michael Ryder went to the feds and claimed it was a cover-up. They didn’t prosecute him, despite having a list of 32 victims, due to pressures from high up, possibly the President or the Attorney General. The outrage over Epstein’s lenient plea deal and lack of punishment raises questions about the justice system’s dealings with high-powered individuals, prompting some to question the existence of a “VIP justice system” in the United States.

    The speaker claims that Epstein was a professional con man with access to people, money, and young girls, and that the government targeted him due to his exploitative and blackmailing behavior. The speaker also suggests that Epstein was meeting with Joe Biden’s CIA director and that he was recruited for his intelligence work due to his predilection for underage girls and his charm, deceitfulness, and sociopathic tendencies.

    The speaker further claims that Epstein’s case makes more sense when viewed from the perspective of an intelligence operation, and that the sweetheart deal he received in 2006, the prison cell cover-up, and the disappearance of his tapes are all explained by his status as an asset. Finally, the speaker points to the recent raid on Epstein’s Caribbean island and the discovery of tapes there as evidence of his intelligence work. The speaker is Stuart Kaplan, a retired FBI special agent.

    Jeffrey Epstein was later convicted as a registered offender, but despite this, he was able to maintain relationships with politicians, CEOs, and public figures, who should have had no interest in him. The speaker suggests that these actions may be due to threats or blackmail from intelligence agencies, as Robert Maxwell, Epstein’s closest confidant, was believed to have been working for Israel’s version of the CIA, Massad. The speaker also mentions the possibility that Epstein was able to blackmail powerful figures due to the intelligence apparatus behind him, making it clear that his actions were not possible without this support.

    The documentary makes claims that Robert Maxwell, an Israeli-born British media tycoon, had spilled confidential nuclear information about Israel, which led to his kidnapping and imprisonment for 18 years. After his death in 1991, Maxwell’s close relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and alleged involvement in intelligence work are speculated upon.

    Maxwell’s lawyer, Alan Dershowitz, is also discussed, highlighting his role in securing Epstein’s plea deal in 2008 and his close friendship with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The video posits that Epstein’s downfall, which took place in 2019, was a result of his growing arrogance and his use of blackmail to maintain power, ultimately outliving his usefulness.

    The opinion is then discussed regarding Jeffrey Epstein’s death in 2019 while he was awaiting trial. While it is widely believed that he committed suicide, the speaker argues that there is a larger conspiracy at play and that other co-conspirators, particularly federal agencies such as the CIA, are responsible for his death. The speaker also raises questions about Epstein’s lifestyle and funding, pointing out that he was known to have only two known clients and had a close relationship with Leslie Wexner, a wealthy CEO with ties to organized crime. The documentary however fails to consider the most likely possibility that Jeffrey Epstein is still alive and his death was faked.

    At the end, the speaker argues that Epstein was compromised himself and that his allies, including Wexner, implemented a system of secrecy and control to keep people from investing with him. The speaker also references the Epstein House of Horrors and the victims’ compensation fund as efforts to cover up his crimes. The speaker then introduces EpsteinJustice.com, an organization aimed at taking accountability for Epstein’s crimes and protecting children from similar harm.

  • On Company Business – Full 1980 Documentary on the CIA by Allan Francovich

    On Company Business – Full 1980 Documentary on the CIA by Allan Francovich

    On Company Business is a 1980 documentary on the CIA by the late Allan Francovich. The documentary is a comprehensive look at the role of the CIA in various covert operations during and after WWII. The video covers several topics, including the economic rationale behind the Marshall Plan, the agency’s involvement in supporting democratic forces in Europe, and their use of front organizations to influence events in various countries. It also covers the tensions between Fidel Castro’s Cuba and the United States during the Cold War, the failed Bay of Pigs invasion, and the various assassination attempts against Castro.

    The documentary also delves into the CIA’s involvement in the assassination of Congo’s first Prime Minister, Patrice Lumumba, and how they attempted to assassinate him with poison. Throughout the video, former CIA officers discuss their experiences working for the agency, the risks involved, and the need for secrecy in their operations.

    The video also provides an in-depth look at the CIA and its involvement in Latin American politics during the Cold War. The CIA is shown to have assisted multinational corporations, engaged in propaganda and political warfare, trained labor organizers against communist movements, and supported military coups. Torture and assassination were also used in the agency’s efforts to combat communism, including the training of death squads and torture techniques in Latin America. The video also discusses specific incidents, such as the Bay of Pigs and the Chilean political situation, to illustrate the CIA’s activities during this period.

    In the last section the video discusses the CIA’s involvement in various foreign conflicts, including in Chile and Angola. It highlights the agency’s attempts to manipulate events to further American interests, often at the expense of human rights and democratic values. The documentary also delves into the relationship between the CIA and American news media, with evidence suggesting that the agency planted stories abroad that eventually made their way to the United States. The video presents various individuals, including former CIA agents, who express differing opinions on the agency’s actions and the ethics of clandestine operations. Overall, the documentary raises questions about the role and accountability of US intelligence agencies in shaping foreign policy and their impact on global relations.

    At 00:00:00 various individuals including former CIA agents discuss their experiences working for the CIA and the nature of its operations. They discuss covert tactics and weaponry such as poisons and electric guns. One former agent also speaks about being recruited under the guise of working for the Department of Defense before discovering that he was actually working for the CIA. Others discuss the risk of having a secret organization like the CIA, but highlight the necessity of having some sort of intelligence service. The documentary also touches on the history of covert operations during wartime.

    At 00:05:00 the video discusses the economic rationale behind the Marshall Plan and the CIA’s role in combatting left-wing political organizations in Europe that opposed the plan. After World War II, there was a fear that the return to unemployment of the depression could be averted only by creating foreign markets for overproduction. Thus, the Marshall Plan was established to provide economic support to the free nations of Europe. However, left-wing political parties in Europe, especially in France and Italy, who were the backbone of the resistance to fascism, opposed the plan, knowing that reconstruction would bring economic and political dependence on the United States. Consequently, the CIA was partly set up to combat on a political warfare basis against the efforts of these parties to impede the success of the Marshall Plan.

    At 00:10:00 the speaker discusses the CIA’s support of democratic forces in Europe and their opposition to fascist and right-wing groups. They also talk about the Cold War and how the fear of communist influence was widespread at the time, with Senator McCarthy fueling conspiracy theories about Soviet spies in the State Department. The speaker mentions that the institutions of power which are penetrated include political parties, security services, youth and student movements, cultural organizations, and even professional societies. To combat this, the CIA funded media outlets such as Radio Free Europe and Radio Liberty to spread the message of freedom and provide specific instructions for the Russian people on working towards their liberation under the noses of the Soviet secret police.

    At 00:15:00 it is discussed how the CIA used front organizations to influence events in various countries after World War II. Examples of organizations that were set up by the CIA include the World Assembly of Youth and Coordinating Secretariat of National Unions of Students, which were used to control and influence their members. The CIA also helped to found the International Confederation of Free Trade Unions. The video mentions Irving Brown, who received money from the CIA and distributed it to labor operations, and how the CIA provided financial aid to French unions during a general strike. Overall, the CIA’s involvement in supporting various organizations was considered patriotic during the 1950s.

    At 00:20:00 the documentary discusses the opposition that the communists had towards the Marshall Plan, which was providing economic aid to support freedom and France. The communists attempted to defeat the plan via political strikes called by trade unions and political elements. The US government consequently called upon Irby Brown and Jacob Stone to break the strikes, and they used the help of the Corsican mafia, particularly the racketeer name Fairy Pazhani, who ended up becoming a paid agent of Central Intelligence. The documentary also mentions a conversation between the acting labor attache and George Meany, the Secretary of the American Federation of Labor, where the former gave his views on how unpopular Irving Dunne was and how much damage he was doing to free labor and discrediting people.

    At 00:25:00 it is revealed that the purpose of political and front organizations in Europe after World War II was to fill the political vacuum with forces that would be favorable to close relations with the United States and to preclude any left-wing participation in political life. This was achieved through support for anti-communist movements, intervention in the affairs of other countries, and the support of half-assed dictators, military print, or oligarchy that promised to maintain the status quo beneficial to the interests of the United States and its corporations.

    At 00:30:00 the documentary delves into the tensions between Fidel Castro’s Cuba and the United States during the Cold War. The US government was concerned with the spread of communism, and viewed Fidel Castro as a threat to its interests. However, some within the CIA believed that the US should not be attempting to overthrow or assassinate national liberation leaders like Castro, but rather work with them. Nonetheless, tensions boiled over when Castro announced the expropriation of US-owned property in Cuba, leading to a break in diplomatic relations and the events that followed. The documentary explores the CIA’s involvement in various operations to undermine and overthrow Castro, including the attempted assassination and sabotage.

    At 00:35:00 of the CIA documentary, the necessity of keeping operations secret from public debate is discussed, citing the infamous Bay of Pigs fiasco as an example of when a lack of secrecy led to failure. The documentary includes footage and accounts of the failed invasion of Cuba by human revolutionary troops and the heated denials of aggression made by the US. A former CIA officer stationed in Cuba recounts his personal connections with some of the participants of the Bay of Pigs landing force and his recommendation of individuals for the operation. The epilogue shows exiled family members desperately seeking news of their loved ones while Fidel Castro threatens death for the invaders and President Kennedy seeks bipartisan support for the situation.

    At 00:40:00 several individuals discuss the possibility of President Kennedy and Bobby Kennedy knowing about assassination plans against Fidel Castro. While there is no definitive answer, it is clear that many high-level officials within the U.S. government were aware of the constant actions being taken against Cuba, including attempts to blow up power plants and sugar mills. However, no one in the government approved of any CIA-led assassinations, and the head of the agency at that time stated that he had no knowledge of such plans. It is unlikely that any President would overtly order an assassination, but rather issue non-directed orders to solve problems in Cuba.

    At 00:45:00 the video discusses various attempts by the CIA to get rid of Fidel Castro, including the involvement of organized crime figures such as John Roselli and Sam Giancana. It is revealed that William K. Harvey was in touch with Roselli during an alleged plot to transport poison pills from Florida to Havana; though there was no evidence that this plot ever materialized. Meanwhile, the CIA’s involvement in operations such as these typically did not extend beyond the planning stage, with the work being carried out by contract agents, gangsters, and mercenaries. However, there are reports that at the time of JFK’s assassination a CIA officer was meeting with a Cuban agent in Paris to provide an assassination device to kill Castro.

    At 00:50:00 there is a discussion about the CIA’s involvement in potentially attempting to assassinate Fidel Castro, using methods like giving an agent a device that kills. The committee questions the morality and safety of such covert operations, especially when involving dangerous organizations like the Mafia. The CIAers are quick to note that it is a tricky business, involving evaluations by good intelligence officers and policymakers. The video also shows some historical events, such as the capture of former Congo premier Patrice Lumumba and the CIA’s training camp at Camp Perry.

    At 00:55:00 former CIA officers discuss the agency’s involvement in the assassination of Congo’s first Prime Minister, Patrice Lumumba, and how they attempted to assassinate him with poison. The operation ultimately failed, and the CIA resorted to convincing Mobutu to have Lumumba killed. The officers also explain how the agency recruited and worked with agents, including how they sometimes targeted people who were a little devious. They also discussed the risks for intelligence officers who attempt to recruit assets to serve the interests of the US rather than their own country.

    At 01:00:00 the speaker discusses how the CIA would check the names of potential Venezuelan employees of Creole Petroleum Company against their computerized files for any indication of left-wing political sympathies or membership. This was an example of the CIA assisting a multinational corporation. The CIA was also engaged in propaganda and political warfare throughout Latin America to create the optimum operating conditions for multinational corporations. They created fear and hysteria around the growth of left-wing political organizations, such as the communist organizations, and used forged and false documents to bring about a timely effect in certain areas.

    At 01:05:00 a CIA officer talks about how they planted a report in a toothpaste tube to frame a left-wing organization leader who had gone to Cuba on a trip. The planted report in the toothpaste tube was found by the authorities in his luggage upon his return, which led to his immediate arrest and the eventual establishment of a military Quinta. Additionally, the video discusses the CIA’s efforts to drum up support for the Venezuelan charge that Castro was supplying arms to guerrillas in Venezuela by influencing the Argentine government. The video also talks about Kennedy’s policy towards Cuba and how the issue between communism and democracy will eventually be settled by the ordinary working people of different nations.

    At 01:10:00 a man who worked for the CIA recounts how he was called to Washington and interviewed for a position in Brazil. His position was supposedly going to be for a phony organization known as the Postal Telegraph California International, which was later revealed as being under the CIA. He was trained on how to organize against communists, and he eventually became fanatical about it. He was later accused of collaborating with the CIA and did not provide a response to the accusation.

    At 01:15:00 it is revealed that the American Institute for Free Labor Development was established during the Kennedy period, and it was a joint venture between American trade unions and multinational corporations operating in Latin America. The organization’s cover was education and social projects like developing cooperatives and housing, but the real reason was to create organizers who could go back to their industries and spend time doing nothing but organizing. The organization trained Democratic trade unionists, and it was hoped that they could go back to their respective countries and put into practice some of the things that they learned. However, the organization’s board of directors had prominent American employers, such as Peter Grace, and the list of corporations that contributed included American corporations that had never paid decent wages or provided good working conditions in the United States.

    At 01:20:00 it is discussed how the CIA would train and support labor organizers in Latin American countries to turn against the communist movements and prevent them from taking over unions and other organizations. The training included sending people to Front Royal for courses on organizing. The efforts resulted in the overthrow of the Gula regime in Brazil, and the CIA’s involvement was suspected by both the communists and their opponents. The AFL-CIO denied receiving any money from the CIA, and the organization’s books were open to the public. The CIA did not want any records kept to avoid any information leaks.

    At 01:25:00of the CIA documentary, it is revealed that the organization led a propaganda campaign and disinformation strategy in Brazil to justify a military coup in 1964. The campaign emphasized the threat of communism and rallied support from women and religious groups. The CIA also supported the coup by providing arms and even naval assistance. The exiled Brazilian president, João Goulart, had sympathies with Fidel Castro and his regime was ultimately overthrown by a bloodless military coup. Many Communist supporters were jailed and eliminated from the labor movement, while the Brazilian economy suffered as a result of the regime change.

    At 01:30:00 of the video, the Bay of Pigs is mentioned as a turning point in the CIA’s involvement in training and expanding foreign police forces to fight communism. Byron Angle, a member of the CIA at the time, was recruited to expand and lead this program. A third of the police training was devoted to making them aware of the communist menace. As a result, many countries’ police forces ended up using torture, including methods learned from the United States, when interrogating suspected communists. Victims, including political exiles in Europe, reported being tortured with US Army Field telephones, and they were often subjected to cruel forms of torture with no embarrassment from the torturers.

    At 01:35:00 the video discusses the use of torture as a means of interrogation during the Cold War and its ineffectiveness in getting information. The CIA officer interviewed explains that torture is a necessity in the system due to the continued resistance of leftist groups. The video also covers the unsuccessful attempts of the CIA to weaken the left in Uruguay during the 1960s and the promotion of repression during that period. The video then details the story of Dan Mitrione, a CIA officer who worked in Uruguay to improve police intelligence capabilities. Mitrione’s use of torture as an interrogation technique, such as the use of thin wires, is described in detail.

    At 01:40:00 it is revealed that the agency was involved in the training of death squads and torture techniques in Latin America during the 1970s. The program school in Los Fresnos, Texas was used to train students from Latin America how to construct bombs and destroy radio stations and cars, with the CIA running the courses. The agency also maintained a subversive control watchlist that included detailed information on left-wing political activists, which would be handed over to local police or military authorities for action. The death squads were then sent to Argentina where several leaders were kidnapped and assassinated, including Hector Gutierrez and Senator Selmeri Collini, prompting the victims’ families to register with police and flee the country.

    At 01:45:00 it is revealed that the murder of political leaders in Uruguay, including Mitrione, was part of an international campaign that included assassinations of political figures in Chile, Bolivia, and Europe. Mitrione’s presence and actions in Uruguay were part of a CIA advisory program that led to an increase in torture and brutality. Mitrione was eventually kidnapped and killed, and while the US government denied involvement, the murder highlighted the inhumanity of terrorism.

    At 01:50:00 the video discusses the CIA’s involvement in Chile during the 1960s and 1970s. The CIA provided millions of dollars in assistance to various political parties to strengthen them against the agenda supported by Castro. The goal was to prevent IND from being elected president of Chile in 1964 and to elect the Christian Democrats instead. However, after IND was elected in 1970, the CIA launched a plot to stop his inauguration and offered $250,000 for a constitutional ploy to block his election. Nixon ordered the CIA to proceed with the plot with the Chilean military to try to thwart the inauguration of IND.

    At 01:55:00 the speaker discusses his efforts to prevent a plot with the Chilean military, which included sending cables to the White House and State Department. The speaker discovered that the CIA had countermanded his specific orders and was secretly plotting with an extreme right-wing group called Patria Libertad, which had been put off limits by him. He also speaks of his meeting with Kissinger and the President where he accidentally touched a sensitive nerve and learned of a plot to eliminate certain individuals in Chile. The speaker suggests that the Chile situation warrants high priority for the entire administration, and everything should be done quietly.

    At 02:00:00 of the documentary, it is discussed how the CIA attempted to create a financial squeeze on Chile, preventing the government from governing efficiently. By financing truck drivers, the CIA created conditions that would lead to right-wing military leaders intervening, restoring national order, and appealing to those who seek peace. However, this peace is often the peace of the grave for many people, and it didn’t deter Chilean President Allende from standing up for the will of the majority of Chile.

    At 02:05:00 the video provides a collection of transcripts that detail the events surrounding the coup against Salvador Allende’s government in Chile. Orlando Letelier, a former Chilean ambassador to the US, recounts how he was informed of the coup in the early morning hours and how the military demanded that Allende surrender. The video also features commentary from US officials who express regret for the loss of life in Chile but also express that the coup was an internal affair. The aftermath of the coup is also explored, including the torture of hundreds of people in the Air Force Academy basement.

    At 02:10:00 various individuals discuss the dilemma faced by those involved in clandestine CIA operations in Latin America, as well as the potential conflict between US and Latin American interests. The video also features a clip of former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger testifying about US policy towards Chile during a period of political unrest. The Americans defend their actions as being in the national interest, but there is growing public concern and moral dilemmas regarding the ethics of such actions.

    At 02:15:00 of the CIA documentary, excerpts of interviews and congressional hearings are shown discussing the oversight function of the US Congress. It is revealed that the Congress had failed in its duty to oversee the executive branch of government and, in particular, the CIA. Various committees and subcommittees of Congress were tasked with oversight of the intelligence community and its operations. However, it was common practice for the intelligence community to brief only specific members of Congress rather than the entire committee, and often they would not pass on the information to the full committee. Some senators even expressed that they did not want to know certain things. Despite this, the CIA continued to involve itself in foreign conflicts, such as by flying arms to Angola, which would lead to further criticism of the agency.

    At 02:20:00 several individuals are questioned about the possible involvement of the United States in the war in Angola. While some deny any knowledge, others admit to receiving CIA funds and support for their activities in Angola. The legality of this involvement is called into question, as the War Powers Act requires that Congress be informed before the commitment of the United States Armed Forces, including paramilitary or other forces, in such activities abroad. Despite this, it appears that the CIA has been recruiting mercenaries and providing them with weapons and training. The reasons for US involvement in Angola are also discussed, including the old Cold War rationale of stopping the Soviet tide and supporting allies who have assisted US policies in other parts of the world.

    At 02:25:00 the documentary details the United States’ involvement in Angola and their fear of Soviet and Cuban influence in the region. The CIA spread false stories about Cubans raping Angolan women to generate support for their efforts in the country. While the CIA was coordinating with South Africa, they were almost helpless against the MPLA, and after an attack by Mobutu’s spare commanders, the United States’ effort was out of business. Senator Clark was sent to Africa to confer with southern African heads of state, and the CIA attempted to control the narrative by ordering their chief of station to prepare Mobutu and the FNLA president on what they should and should not say about the situation in Angola.

    At 02:30:00 the video describes how the CIA attempted to save face after spending millions of dollars on the Angola conflict. The agency could not provide further funding due to public opinion, leaving the soldiers without support. The families of those involved had difficulty receiving help from the US government, as officials claimed that these actions were not part of official policy. The former soldiers and their families expressed their disappointment in how the government handled the situation.

    At 02:35:00 the issue of the CIA’s influence on American news media is discussed, with clear indications that the agency planted stories abroad that eventually made its way to the United States. The chairman questions if the CIA paid people who worked in American journals or for television networks. The head of CBS at that time confirmed that certain relationships had already been established with the CIA and that using CIA agents as sources of information was useful for assessing world conditions. However, the risk of being viewed with disfavor by the public is high now for reporters who work with the CIA to influence American news. The Church Committee was infiltrated by CIA people, and abuses were ordered by presidents, not just the CIA. The main argument is that the CIA is just an instrument for policy execution, and the people who determine US foreign policy are the ones who call upon the CIA and other agencies to execute that policy.

    At 02:40:00 the speaker discusses how the CIA consistently maintained relationships with various security services in countries such as Iran, Chile, Brazil, and Uruguay, even though the human rights violations committed by these security services were publicly known. The speaker argues that these institutional relationships continue to some extent and that they must be stopped for real progress on human rights issues. Additionally, the speaker criticizes the actions of ex-CIA agent Philip Agee, who published a book containing the names of CIA agents and their addresses, calling for them to be punished for violating their agreements to keep classified information confidential. Overall, the speaker opposes secret intervention and subversion abroad and believes that individuals must fight against it.

    At 02:45:00 a former CIA agent denies any involvement in the killing of Richard Welch and explains that Welch was not killed because of his name or nationality, but rather due to the CIA’s history of destabilizing efforts towards socialism and progress in countries like Greece. The agent discusses the CIA’s promotion of dictators and suppression of human rights in various nations, citing Iran as an example where he believes the United States has benefited from its relationship with the Shah. However, he also acknowledges that the Iranian people may not have shared the same view and that the propaganda coming from the regime was not necessarily reflective of reality.

    At 02:50:00 retired CIA officer Stansfield Turner discusses the agency’s involvement in Iran during the Shah’s regime. Turner recounts how the CIA was instrumental in organizing the Iranian internal security police, known as SAVAK, which was well-documented as using torture to suppress political dissidents. He notes that the Iranian people are fully aware of the CIA’s role in creating SAVAK and how this has caused rage and anger towards the US. Turner then takes an oath pledging to support and defend the US Constitution.

    Odysee Video

  • Interview with Captain Dan Hanley – Airline Pilot and 9/11 Whistleblower

    Interview with Captain Dan Hanley – Airline Pilot and 9/11 Whistleblower

    Captain Dan Hanley, a former commercial airline pilot and aviation whistleblower, spoke on The Michael Decon Program about the corruption and safety concerns present in the airline industry, particularly in regards to the events of 9/11.

    Hanley founded the website 911 Pilot Whistleblowers to expose the fact that the 9/11 planes were remotely controlled, and that neither the hijackers nor experienced pilots could have flown the flight profiles at the given speed and altitude.

    Hanley also discussed his personal experience, including being illegally terminated by United Airlines for speaking out about safety issues and the grounding of pilots who are whistleblowers.

    Additionally, Hanley shared skepticism about historical events and a belief that the government and media have misled and manipulated the public.

    When speaking about the damage done to the Pentagon, Hanley provided evidence that a 757 plane struck the building and described the off-body parts and identifiable passengers found as proof of a plane crash.

    Hanley also expressed his belief that a group of powerful people, including Mossad, CIA, MI6 and the Rothschild cabal, were behind the attacks.

    He discussed his experiences as a federal whistleblower and the lack of response he received from relevant government agencies when he attempted to bring forth evidence.

    Hanley encouraged individuals to speak out until justice is served and provided tips on what to do in case of a nuclear explosion.

    00:05:00

    Captain Dan Hanley, a former commercial airline pilot, received a plethora of certifications and flew different aircraft in his 35-year career. He shared his experience flying for the Navy during the Cold War and his tenure at United Airlines. However, his career ended due to his vocal opinions on the safety and security implications of the 9/11 events, and he was illegally terminated. In this section, Captain Hanley emphasizes that he, as an experienced aircraft pilot, could not have flown the 9/11 flight profiles at the given speed and altitude, especially the Pentagon profile, and neither could the alleged hijackers.

    00:10:00

    In this section, Captain Dan Hanley, who worked as an airline pilot, talks about his six-year fight with the US government AFAA and airline to expose the corruption in the industry. Despite evidence and witnesses, his case was dismissed. He founded a website called 911 Pilot Whistleblowers and serves as its Director and international public spokesperson. The website focuses on efforts to put a stop to the corruption that was prevalent in the airline industry, especially during the time of the 9/11 attacks. Hanley explains his personal experience during the tragedy and mentions that the website aims to shed light on the events of 9/11.

    00:15:00

    In this section, Captain Dan Hanley explains that the main purpose of the 911 Pilots organization is to demonstrate that the planes used in the attack were remotely controlled through a system called the uninterrupted autopilot. According to Hanley, this system allows a remote source to take complete control of the aircraft autopilot and flight management computer, and fly it to its target. Hanley has been trying to recruit active and retired pilots to attest to the fact that neither the hijackers nor they themselves could have flown the 9/11 flight profile. Hanley cites the example of the Pentagon profile flown by a 29-year-old Saudi Arabian hijacker named Hani Hanjour, who was a poor student and could barely speak English, and the maneuver he made in his first attempt was nearly impossible even for experienced pilots. Hanley suspects that there might be more to the story behind the alleged hijackers.

    00:20:00

    In this section of the interview, Captain Dan Hanley discusses the suspicious activities of one of the 9/11 hijackers, Hani Hanjour, prior to the attacks. Hanjour attempted to rent a single-engine airplane but was found to be an incompetent pilot by instructors who evaluated him. Despite this, Hanjour was later able to skillfully maneuver a commercial airliner during the attacks. Hanley believes that this evidence has been covered up by the FBI and the 9/11 Commission, and shares his attempts to track down witnesses and present this information to the government.

    00:25:00

    In this section, Captain Dan Hanley discusses the lack of a criminal investigation into the 9/11 attacks and the failures of the 9/11 commission to address the questions and concerns of the victims’ families. He explains that the commission was underfunded, time-constrained, and set up to fail, with the executive director having the final report outlined before the commission began their work. Additionally, no pilots were allowed to testify before the commission regarding the absurd assertion that the terrorists were able to fly the planes into the World Trade Center towers. Hanley also shares his experience of being grounded permanently by the FAA under the guise of being mentally unstable after speaking out about safety and security concerns in the airline industry.

    00:30:00

    In this section of the interview, Captain Dan Hanley discusses his efforts to raise safety concerns with his employer, United Airlines, and the union that represented him. Despite following Federal Aviation Administration regulations and submitting multiple reports to his employer and union, he was stonewalled and eventually grounded for “psychological” reasons. When he sought legal advice from mental health professionals, he was advised to undergo psychological evaluations to protect himself and ensure that he was fit to fly, but United Airlines used the results of these evaluations to further justify their decision to ground him.

    00:35:00

    In this section, Captain Dan Hanley discusses how he was told to submit to the Employee Assistance Program after an incident with a flight attendant, which was endorsed by the company, union, and FAA. After flying to Chicago and meeting with a flight surgeon, he was taken to a mental health facility without realizing it and was diagnosed with bipolar disorder by a psychologist who had no knowledge of aviation. Despite having evidence and recorded conversations, he was ignored by the government after trying to report the situation and ultimately went through a tough experience that impacted his wife and children.

    00:40:00

    In this section of the interview, Captain Dan Hanley discusses how whistleblowers in the airline industry are treated by the government and how it affects their families. He shares his story of losing his 27-year marriage and two children who blame him for the divorce. Hanley is no longer a U.S citizen because of what he experienced as a whistleblower. He is now part of the Whistleblowing Airline Pilots Association, a grassroots organization that aims to expose the wrongful process of eliminating whistleblowing pilots in the industry. Hanley had lost his 35-year career and reputation as a pilot, while his children were the ultimate cost.

    00:45:00

    In this section, Captain Dan Hanley and Michael Decon discuss the patriotism that was pumped up after 9/11, even though it was a façade and the government deluded people with false patriotism. Furthermore, the media worked with the government to instigate patriotism, and we have witnessed this again, even with the recent COVID pandemic. Hanley asserts that the CIA exists not to solve problems but to create them, and this is evident in their involvement in JFK’s assassination, their lies about weapons of mass destruction, and their use of hijackers as their assets. Hanley believes that various groups, such as the Bilderberg, the Rothschild Cabal, and the 13 Bloodlines, collaborated for years to plan 9/11. Additionally, he questions American gullibility from historical events such as Pearl Harbor.

    00:50:00

    In this section of the interview, Captain Dan Hanley discusses his skepticism of various historical events, including the Kennedy assassination, the Gulf of Tonkin incident, Operation Paperclip, and the official narrative of the 9/11 attacks. Hanley shares his belief that 9/11 and other events were a test of global gullibility and that the media is complicit in propagating false narratives. He also mentions a book by a physics professor from the University of Punjab who claims that bin Laden died in 2005 and was fired and thrown in jail when he spoke publicly about it. A caller also shares their experience of being told not to take a mental test by their union and a mechanic’s belief that they installed a box in the plane that crashed.

    00:55:00

    In this section, Captain Dan Hanley is interviewed on The Michael Decon Program about the existence of an autopilot system that could have taken control of the airplane during the 9/11 attacks. An avionics technician named Wayne Anderson saw this system in operation back in 1996 on a Boeing 757 and had given an interview after which he was chastised by McDonald Douglas. The system has existed in some form since 1944 and is derived from cruise missile technology. Captain Hanley and the caller on the show agree that it would have been impossible for the hijackers to navigate and control the planes manually. The accuracy of navigation systems on modern commercial jet aircraft is such that when the weather is below a certain visibility, pilots are required to Auto Land the airplane, where it tracks the center line of the runway until the Pilot disconnects the autopilot.

    01:00:00

    In this section, Captain Dan Hanley and Michael Decon discuss the controversy surrounding what hit the Pentagon on 9/11. The argument has been whether it was a missile or American 77, or if an airplane was even involved at all. Hanley shares that there were 99 pilot whistleblowers who couldn’t have flown the plane, but he also acknowledges that many different theories exist. The FBI won’t release the camera footage around the site, which adds to the issue. They also address the fact that there are many people online who try to discredit those who question the official narrative, and that some of these individuals have been paid to do so.

    01:05:00

    In this section of the interview, the hosts and callers discuss the negative actions of the CIA and FBI, with one caller highlighting the Waco incident and Oklahoma City bombing as examples. Another caller references a Wikipedia page detailing the technology available in 1984 that allowed for remote control aircraft navigation and compares it to the advanced technology today. The hosts express the importance of educating oneself on these topics and encourage callers to share their opinions and be a part of the program.

    01:10:00

    In this section of the interview, a caller discusses his experience of witnessing the events of 9/11 in a sports bar in New Zealand and the disbelief and anger that followed. He talks about the hostile times where people were not allowed to speak against the narrative that was being pushed and how this lack of discourse allowed the official narrative to persist. They also discuss the self-censorship that is present in American culture and how it has been a factor in the ability to speak out against the narrative. Finally, they touch upon the idea that this incident was part of a larger plan that had been in the works for many years and the difficulty in discussing this narrative because of the perceived association with anti-Semitism.

    01:15:00

    In this section, the caller expresses their belief that Israelis have no business making laws in the United States and criticizes his family members who refuse to question the official narrative of 9/11. He recounts how he has been visited by the FBI several times but takes pleasure in cracking jokes with them. Later, another caller joins the show, identifying himself as being with Scientists for 9/11 Truth, and claims that there is evidence of a 757 hitting the Pentagon on 9/11.

    01:20:00

    In this section, Captain Dan Hanley was interviewed live on The Michael Decon Program. They discussed the evidence of what happened at the Pentagon during 9/11. There was a lot of misinformation about the Pentagon, with many people believing there was some sort of missile or farce happening, but the evidence shows a 757 plane caused the damage. Photos show all the damage on the first floor and the extent of the impact damage on the outside. There were videos taken that recorded the plane crossing the lawn and evidence of the right and left wingtips and engines. The recovery of the off-body parts and identification of all the actual passengers provide compelling evidence of what happened.

    01:25:00

    In this section, Captain Dan Hanley is being interviewed about his belief that a plane struck the Pentagon on 9/11, not a missile. He mentions the hate mail he receives and that his stance has been thoroughly researched. Hanley goes on to discuss his belief that it was a group of powerful people, including Mossad CIA MI6, who were behind the events of 9/11, and that the Rothschild cabal and the creation of the nation state of Israel were part of the motivation for the attacks. He also mentions that his experiences with 9/11 caused him to become interested in conspiracy theories and seeking the truth, which has become a lifelong pursuit.

    01:30:00

    In this section of the interview, Captain Dan Hanley discusses his belief that the military-industrial complex benefitted from the 6.2 trillion dollar expenditure since 9/11. He also mentions insider trading that occurred before the events of 9/11 and how it is a clear sign of a false flag. Hanley encourages people to visit 911pilot.org to read interviews with pilots around the world who all believe that the official narrative could not have been true. He also shares his experience with trying to report information concerning the crime to various government agencies, but ultimately being stonewalled for 30 months.

    01:35:00

    In this section, Captain Dan Hanley discusses his experiences with federal whistleblower cases and the lack of response he received when attempting to bring forth evidence to relevant government agencies. He shares the story of the Lawyers Committee for 9/11 Inquiry, who presented 57 evidence packages to a U.S attorney in New York, which led to the announcement of a grand jury investigation into their allegations. However, the Department of Justice, the FBI, and the National Institute of Standards and Technology blocked their evidence, and the grand jury was prevented from moving forward. Hanley talks about how they have exhausted all political and legal avenues in the United States and are now trying to reach out to the International Community to investigate the 9/11 crime.

    01:40:00

    In this section, Captain Dan Hanley emphasizes the importance of continuing to speak out about 9/11 until justice is served. He expresses optimism that the truth will eventually come to light with the power of information exchange in the information age. He also provides his social media information for those who want to follow his vocal opinions on the topic. The segment ends with a clip from a 2001 interview with Donald Trump about 9/11, where he suggests that the towers may have been brought down by bombs in addition to the planes. The host encourages listeners to keep speaking out and never stay silent about these important issues.

    01:45:00

    In this section, Captain Dan Hanley provides tips on what to do in case of a nuclear explosion, advising individuals to get inside a building and move away from windows. He goes on to suggest staying inside, shutting all doors and windows, and having a basement or getting as far into the middle of the building as possible. If one was outside after the blast, he recommends getting clean immediately, removing and bagging all outer clothing to avoid radioactive dust or ash away from the body. Finally, he advises staying tuned, following media for more information, and not stepping outside until officials say it’s safe.

    YouTube Video

  • JFK to 9/11 – Everything Is a Rich Man’s Trick

    JFK to 9/11 – Everything Is a Rich Man’s Trick

    The documentary “Everything is a Rich Man’s Trick” explores the conspiracy theories surrounding the assassination of JFK, the role of secret societies in world events, and the involvement of American businessmen in funding and supporting the Nazi regime, including the use of slave labor.

    It also reveals the Mafia’s influence over Hollywood and politics, and how Lucky Luciano forged a relationship with the CIA, using profits from drug running to fuel wars around the globe.

    The film questions the responsibility of world leaders such as Winston Churchill and the Vatican in the rise of Hitler and the Nazi war machine and suggests that the rich played on both sides of the war to protect themselves from the Soviets.

    In the beginning, the documentary “Everything Is a Rich Man’s Trick” discusses the events leading up to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy and suggests that there was a larger conspiracy at play involving the CIA, the mafia, and the military-industrial complex.

    The video claims that the assassination was executed by a team of snipers who were guarded by Cubans and that the fatal shot came from a storm drain.

    It is suggested that George H.W. Bush was involved in the plot and played a role in controlling the forensic evidence.

    The video also highlights the corruption within the American political system and how the rich elite profited off of wars and controlled the Nuremberg trials.

    The video further addresses the aftermath of the JFK assassination, including the theft of the President’s cadaver, the botched autopsy, and the plotters’ cover-up.

    The documentary then explains how the wealthy control the media, including the CIA’s involvement in buying and using media outlets to manipulate public perception.

    The film also explores the use of airforce bases in Europe to connect with the poppy fields in Pakistan and Afghanistan, generating billions of dollars through the sale of refined cocaine and heroin in Europe and the USA, and the media’s coverage of 9/11, which involves paid actors speaking lines that had been written for them.

    Ultimately, the documentary emphasizes how powerful and corrupt individuals and groups can shape the public’s perception of events and control their actions.

    Lastly, “Everything Is a Rich Man’s Trick” explores various concepts, such as terrorism being used as military deception by the rich, the concept of divide and rule to control populations, and the true wealth of the Queen of England and Rothschild merchant bankers.

    The video argues that everything in our lives is a rich man’s trick, and that the ruling class uses tools such as the media, tax system, religion, and false flag terrorism to control the population.

    The speaker suggests the need for a revolution to take power away from corrupt politicians and the ruling class, as they control the police and justice system.

    Additionally, the video raises the question of why a society would kill its own best leaders, such as JFK, implying that this event is a reflection of a corrupt and brutal society.

    YouTube Video

  • Warren Commission Report on JFK

    Warren Commission Report on JFK

    With the video containing the interview with Lee Harvey Oswald’s mother, you are in for a treat to watch this!

    The video is a transcript of a news broadcast from CBS News on November 22, which was the day President John F. Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas, Texas. The broadcast covers the aftermath of the assassination, including the killing of Lee Harvey Oswald, the man believed to have shot Kennedy.

    There are interviews with witnesses who appeared before the Warren Commission, a government inquiry into the assassination, including Oswald’s mother and wife, Mrs. Ruth Payne, who took them in, and Mrs. Roberts, who rented a room to Oswald.

    They discuss Oswald’s background and behavior leading up to the assassination. There are also segments discussing the Warren Report, which was released on that day and aimed to answer questions about the assassination and identify whether there was a conspiracy.

    Several prominent Americans were appointed to the commission, including Chief Justice Earl Warren, Richard B. Russell, John Sherman Cooper, Hale Boggs, Gerald R. Ford, Allen W. Dulles, and John J. McCloy.

    The Warren Report was almost a thousand pages long, and the broadcast covers some of the key findings from the report, such as whether Oswald acted alone, whether he was connected to any groups or individuals, and whether there was a larger conspiracy involved in the assassination.

    The broadcast notes that there were many unanswered questions surrounding the assassination and that the report did not necessarily resolve all of them.

    At around the 8:10 minute mark on video, Oswald’s mother is asked: “Mrs. Oswald, do you feel that your son was an agent of the CIA?” She responds to the question that she thinks he was. She also got mail in his name from the State Department, suggesting that Oswald was indeed a CIA asset.

    Bullet Points

    • On November 22, 1963, President John F. Kennedy is shot to death while in a motorcade in Dallas, Texas, and the man Dallas police say shot the president, Lee Harvey Oswald, is killed by Jack Ruby.
    • President Lyndon Johnson appoints a commission to investigate the assassination and the Warren Report, a document close to a thousand pages, is released 10 months later.
    • Witnesses who appeared before the Warren Commission are interviewed by CBS News, including Oswald’s wife, mother, and boarding house keeper.
    • Questions arise about Oswald’s motives, career, and whether he acted alone in the assassination or was part of a conspiracy involving right-wingers or foreign powers.
    • Oswald’s belongings, including the rifle and pistol used in the murders, are examined and witnesses describe his behavior leading up to the assassination.

    Let’s Sing Along

    A tale of two men and their fateful paths,
    Kennedy and Oswald- a mystery that lasts.
    Questions abound, conspiracy or not?
    Who held the rifle that fired the shots?

    The Warren Commission sought to find,
    Justice Earl Warren chaired the line.
    Ten-month labor and hundreds of tales,
    Witnesses heard, their stories unveiled.

    As America mourned, the truth emerged,
    Lee Harvey Oswald, the assassin, purged.
    The War Commission’s report, a thousand pages,
    Brought forth answers, a closure to the ages.

    YouTube Video