Miscopy

Tag: Documentary

  • Climate: The Movie – Documentary Proving the Climate Crisis Is a Hoax

    Climate: The Movie – Documentary Proving the Climate Crisis Is a Hoax

    This video challenges the climate change industry, accusing it of prioritizing money over the environment and dismissing the climate crisis as a hoax. The speakers argue that current temperatures are not unprecedented and that historical temperature trends have significantly impacted the evolution of mammals, including humans.

    The video also criticizes the notion that scientific truth is determined by consensus and introduces respected scientists who dismiss the climate alarm. They discuss the urban heat island effect and its impact on temperature records, questioning the accuracy of temperature data used to monitor global warming.

    The speakers also explore the historical relationship between carbon dioxide levels and temperatures, arguing that temperature changes precede CO2 increases. They challenge the accuracy of climate modeling efforts and the role of solar activity in climate change, suggesting that the sun, not CO2, is the primary driver of climate change.

    The scientists also discuss the political origins of the climate alarm and the vast number of jobs and funding that depend on the continuation of the climate crisis narrative.

    The consequences of challenging the climate consensus in the scientific community is also discussed, including backlash from family, colleagues, and funding institutions. The scientists argue that the climate debate has become corrupt and authoritarian, with the imposition and enforcement of the official climate consensus through schools, universities, government, and media.

    The speakers also criticize the hypocrisy of Western environmentalists who call for degrowth and the reduction of industrial manufacturing while ignoring the negative consequences on developing countries, particularly in Africa. The climate agenda is losing support due to the rest of the world not following suit, and people are growing skeptical of climate alarmism and the scientific establishment.

    The ideology of sustainability is unappealing to most people, and there is a growing backlash against climate protesters. The speaker suggests that there is a suspicion that the climate change narrative is driven by self-interest and a desire for more money and power from the publicly funded establishment.

    Detailed Description

    The video begins with the speaker criticizing the climate change industry for prioritizing money over the environment and the potential negative impacts on ecosystems and human lives. He argues that the climate crisis is a hoax and a scam, with billions and even trillions of dollars at stake.

    The speaker, who has built their career on climate research, expresses concern about the end of their livelihood if the climate crisis is not as severe as initially claimed. They accuse climate researchers of corruption and bullying those who challenge the climate alarm.

    The video also touches on the potential for increased government power and authoritarian measures under the guise of saving the planet. The speaker quotes scientists like Professor Alan Sokal and Dick Lindzen, who dismiss the claims of climate alarmists, and accuses those who question the climate crisis of being anti-science and flat earthers.

    The speaker then challenges the notion that scientific truth is determined by consensus and introduces several respected scientists, including Dr. John Clauser, a Nobel laureate, who dismiss the climate alarm as nonsense. The speaker argues that current temperatures are not unprecedented and points to geological evidence, such as the Desert of Judea and its ancient lake bed, to demonstrate that temperatures have varied greatly throughout Earth’s history. The speaker asserts that the Earth is currently in a remarkably cool period compared to the last 550 million years.

    The historical temperature trends on Earth and how they have impacted the evolution of mammals, including humans, is then discussed. The speaker explains that the Earth has been in an Ice Age for the past 50 million years, with temperatures steadily declining. However, during certain periods, such as the Holocene Climate Optimum, temperatures were warmer than they are today, leading to the emergence of civilizations.

    The speaker also notes that temperature fluctuations have occurred throughout history, with periods of extreme cold and milder temperatures. Despite current concerns about global warming, the speaker points out that temperature fluctuations have always occurred and that the current warming trend is a recovery from the Little Ice Age. The speaker also puts the current temperature increase in perspective, noting that temperature variations from year to year can be much greater than the reported increase in temperature since 1880.

    Professor Ross McKitrick discusses the urban heat island effect and its impact on temperature records. He explains that thermometers located in urban areas give out different readings than those in rural areas due to urbanization and human activity. This phenomenon, known as the urban heat island effect, can result in urban temperatures being several degrees Celsius warmer than surrounding rural areas.

    The expansion of towns and suburbs over the 20th century has led to an increase in non-climate influences affecting temperature readings, raising questions about the quality of thermometer data for monitoring global warming. To correct for this, a team led by Dr. William Soon used only records from rural weather stations and showed that temperatures rose from the 1880s but peaked in the 1940s, then cooled until the 1970s, and have since barely surpassed the temperatures of the 1940s.

    The ocean temperature record from around 1900 also shows far less warming in the 20th century and more closely resembles the rural temperature record. Other temperature records, such as tree rings and mercury thermometers on ships, also show little warming. Satellite temperature records also tell a different story, with temperatures showing little warming since the 1970s.

    The discussion then revolves around the use of satellites to monitor global temperatures and the analysis of temperature records. Dr. Spencer and his colleague, Professor John Christie, are credited for their revolutionary development of weather satellites, providing complete global coverage since 1979. The critical question addressed is whether there has been a significant warming trend, and satellites are uniquely positioned to answer this question.

    Urbanization, specifically the urban heat island effect, has contributed to the warming trend, particularly in land records. However, multiple sources, including weather balloon records, satellite records, and ocean records, suggest that the official global temperature record may be showing excessive warming due to urbanization contamination. The findings challenge the notion that human emissions of CO2 are the primary cause of the warming trend over the last 120 years.

    The video also highlights the historical context of CO2 levels, revealing that they have been much higher in the Earth’s geological past, and current levels are relatively low by comparison. CO2 is essential for plant growth, and higher levels of atmospheric CO2 in the past led to a greener world and increased biodiversity.

    The speaker continues by discussing the historical relationship between carbon dioxide (CO2) levels and temperatures on Earth. Contrary to the popular belief that CO2 causes temperature increases, the speaker argues that temperature changes precede CO2 changes. The speaker cites evidence from ancient ice cores, which show that temperature rises before CO2 increases, and that CO2 levels are highest during ice ages and lowest during warmer periods. The speaker also points out that industrial CO2 output has not matched the temperature record, with most warming occurring before the significant increase in industrial production. The speaker concludes by stating that CO2 has never driven temperature changes in the past and that recent temperature increases are not caused by CO2.

    The accuracy of climate modeling efforts is then challenged, stating that virtually all models produce too much warming since 1979 and don’t agree with observed temperatures. The speaker asserts that CO2 does not drive climate change and that clouds are the most powerful force in controlling the Earth’s climate. According to the speaker, Professor Henrik Svensmark from the Danish National Space Institute and astrophysicist Jasper Shiv have found a link between clouds and cosmic rays from exploding supernovas in the galaxy.

    The amount of cloud cover on Earth is related to our journey around the Milky Way, and using geology, one can reconstruct the climates on Earth over the past billion years, which tells the same story as our Galactic journey. The sun, as a source of heat and light, also plays a significant role in climate change through its magnetic storms and solar wind, which affect Earth directly and indirectly.

    The role of solar activity in climate change is then discussed, specifically the impact of solar wind and cosmic rays on cloud formation and Earth’s temperature. The speaker presents evidence from solar activity records and ocean temperature reconstructions, suggesting that solar activity is the primary driver of climate change, not carbon dioxide (CO2).

    The speaker criticizes the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) for ignoring the sun’s role in the climate system and for focusing solely on CO2. The speaker also challenges the notion that extreme weather events, such as heat waves, hurricanes, forest fires, and droughts, are increasing and attributes them to natural climate variability rather than human influence. The speaker encourages people to examine temperature records and historical data to gain a better understanding of climate trends.

    The speaker also challenges the notion of a climate emergency by presenting data on wildfires, hurricanes, melting ice caps, drought, and polar bears, all suggesting no significant long-term changes or increases. The speaker further criticizes the climate science community for its alleged consensus on man-made climate chaos, claiming it began as an eccentric scare story in the 1980s and grew into a multi-billion-dollar industry with researchers from various disciplines jumping on the bandwagon for funding opportunities. The speaker argues that few of these studies question the existence of climate change, leading to the declaration of a scientific consensus.

    Government funding of climate research, which has led to a financial incentive for scientists to exaggerate the evidence of global warming is then discussed. During the Cold War, many government research bodies were established, but with the end of the Cold War and pressure on government spending, these organizations have struggled to justify their continued funding.

    The speaker argues that climate research became a godsend for scientists as it brought significant funding from the government. If scientists did not find evidence of global warming or downplayed its significance, their funding would end. This financial incentive led to a huge exaggeration of the issue, with the publicly funded science establishment having a direct financial interest in playing up the alarm. The climate industry has since grown exponentially, with trillions of dollars being spent annually on renewable energy and related jobs. The growth of this industry has created a demand for highly paid green jobs, from sustainability officers to carbon offset advisers and ESG consultants.

    Universities and businesses have also hired climate officers and established climate programs, creating a pressure to sign up to the climate agenda. The UN’s publically funded PCC conference saw 70,000 delegates fly in from around the world, further highlighting the financial and political significance of the climate industry.

    And the debate moves on to the vast number of jobs and funding that depend on the continuation of the climate crisis narrative. The speaker explains that many individuals and organizations, including government bureaucrats, environmental journalists, heads of renewable companies, and climate researchers, have built their careers and industries around the existence of the climate crisis. However, if it is discovered that CO2 is not having the negative impacts originally claimed, the entire industry could be threatened, as their existence and funding depend on the crisis being an existential threat.

    The speaker also mentions the suppression of research that contradicts the narrative and the marginalization of scientists who question it. The media’s role in perpetuating the narrative, regardless of the accuracy of the predictions, is also addressed.

    The speaker then discusses the political origins of the climate alarm and how it has become synonymous with disdain for free market capitalism and a yearning for bigger government. The climate scare, according to the speaker, began as a political tool from the environmental movement to blame industrial capitalism for the destruction of the planet. The solution, as proposed by climate alarmists, is for the government to regulate private companies and even guide individuals’ lives through micromanaging policies.

    The speaker argues that support for the climate alarm is almost universal among those who depend on government for their livelihoods, including publicly funded education, art, and science establishments. Questioning the climate alarm is socially unacceptable, and climate skeptics face vitriolic attacks and even professional consequences. The speakers Henrik Svensmark and Nir Shaviv share personal experiences of facing backlash for publishing results on the climatic effects of solar activity.

    Dr. Matthew Wicki discusses the consequences of speaking out against the climate consensus in the scientific community. Wicki, a former assistant professor of geology at the University of Alabama, shares how expressing skepticism about climate change led to backlash from his family, colleagues, and funding institutions. He explains that publishing research contrary to the consensus was nearly impossible, and young scientists were discouraged from questioning the climate narrative for fear of losing their careers.

    Wicki describes the climate consensus as a weapon used to bully and intimidate those who refuse to conform, and a tool for the ruling establishment to increase its power and control over people’s lives. He argues that the climate debate has become corrupt and divorced from science, and that the demands for government intervention in every aspect of life based on the climate narrative are a validation of the government’s authority.

    The speaker discusses the growing authoritarianism and censorship surrounding the climate debate. Twenty years ago, the idea of controlling energy use, appliance purchases, and even dictating where people could go would be met with skepticism and dismissal. However, the speaker argues that this is now a reality, with publicly funded establishments in the West imposing and enforcing the official climate consensus through schools, universities, government, and much of the media.

    Regulatory bodies prevent private stations from broadcasting skeptical views, and expressing dissent on climate can risk careers and businesses. Activists even call for skepticism to be criminalized in certain jobs and professions. The consequence is a censorious, authoritarian regime that seeks to control every move, word, and action because of the perceived risk to the survival of mankind.

    The speaker also notes the irony of climate protesters, who condemn capitalism but are often absent from their rallies are the working classes. Instead, they call for a simpler lifestyle in which the consumption choices of the masses are controlled or prohibited. This creates a clash between affluent environmentalists and the masses who have benefited from capitalism’s abundance of affordable goods. The speaker criticizes this as a form of class hypocrisy and self-interest masquerading as public-spirited concern.

    The speaker argues that environmentalists, particularly those in the West, are hypocritical in their calls for degrowth and the reduction of industrial manufacturing, while ignoring the negative consequences of these policies on developing countries. The speaker uses the example of Africa, where access to reliable energy and industrial development are essential for improving agricultural productivity, reducing food waste, and providing clean water.

    However, Western environmentalists oppose these developments, relying instead on expensive and unreliable alternatives. The speaker criticizes this agenda as ethically ruthless and depraved, as it prevents African countries from developing and improving their living standards. The speaker also mentions that many countries in Africa and Asia are ignoring these demands and continuing to use fossil fuels for their development.

    At the end of the video, the speaker discusses how the climate agenda is losing support due to the rest of the world not following suit in reducing emissions and transitioning to renewable energy. The speaker also mentions that people are growing skeptical of climate alarmism and the scientific establishment, as they feel it will negatively impact their everyday lives and cost them a lot of money.

    The speaker notes that the ideology of sustainability, which promotes restriction and doing less, is unappealing to most people. The speaker also shares instances of backlash against climate protesters and mentions that working-class people are becoming increasingly angry about the climate agenda, viewing it as an attack on their lifestyle and freedoms. The speaker suggests that there is a suspicion or realization that the climate change narrative is driven by self-interest and a desire for more money and power from the publicly funded establishment.

    YouTube Video

  • Documentary About How Jeffrey Epstein Struck Questionable Plea Deal with Alex Acosta

    Documentary About How Jeffrey Epstein Struck Questionable Plea Deal with Alex Acosta

    The YouTube video “How Jeffrey Epstein Got Away With It” explores the story behind Jeffrey Epstein’s examination, trial, and conviction for federal sex trafficking involving minors. The video highlights the questionable plea deal struck with Epstein by Alex Acosta, the Chief Federal Prosecutor for Southern Florida, and the implications it had on the justice system. The documentary also examines the case from the perspective of intelligence agencies, particularly the CIA and Israel’s Mossad, and their alleged involvement in it. The video raises questions about the circumstances surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s death in 2019 and suggests alternative explanations for it.

    Acosta was the Chief Federal Prosecutor for Southern Florida from 2005 to 2009, and his job was to ensure that criminals went to jail. He was portrayed as a person of integrity and an honorable guy, who caught the attention of former president Donald Trump. However, he refused to answer questions during his Senate confirmation hearing for the Secretary of Labor position, and the Senate was concerned about a particular case involving Jeffrey Epstein.

    Jeffrey Epstein was a friend of presidents and high-profile lawyers who was arrested on new sex trafficking charges and waiting trial for federal sex trafficking involving minors. Acosta gave Epstein the plea deal of the century, which excused underage sex trafficking, and allowed Epstein to walk free.

    When Acosta was being interviewed for the job of Trump’s labor secretary, he was asked about the questionable plea deal, and he said that he was ordered to stand down immediately because Epstein belonged to intelligence. The current US Attorney General cannot order a US Attorney to stand down unless he is elected by someone who is not part of the judiciary.

    According to Nick Bryan, an expert reporter on the Epstein case, only the president or the Attorney General has the power to order a US attorney to stand down. There have been four presidential administrations that have covered up the Jeffrey Epstein case, and now, the Biden Administration is covering it up. The American government is aiding the embedding of child trafficking by not investigating Jeffrey Epstein.

    The evidence potentially connects Jeffrey Epstein to the CIA and Israel’s Mossad intelligence agency. The film highlights how it was possible for one man to be protected and supported by the entire US government and how Epstein’s lawyers at Morgan and Morgan fight to give victims the best shot at compensation.

    The film also discusses how lawsuits can be expensive but that victims of abuse can receive compensation with the help of law firms. The film explains how Epstein’s case was yanked away from the Palm Beach Police Department and given to a grand jury, where a special prosecutor was responsible for showing the grand jurors the evidence necessary. However, the film argues that the grand jury was corrupt and that the special prosecutor, Barry Cromwell, called only one victim and skewed her credibility.

    The speaker then discusses the background of Jeffrey Epstein and how his victims were repeatedly molested and became addicted to drugs. The system in place allowed the perps to go unpunished once they became “unmarketable” and their damaged credibility would compromise them.

    When the grand jury didn’t indict Epstein on a single count of child abuse, the Palm Beach Police Department and its chief Michael Ryder went to the feds and claimed it was a cover-up. They didn’t prosecute him, despite having a list of 32 victims, due to pressures from high up, possibly the President or the Attorney General. The outrage over Epstein’s lenient plea deal and lack of punishment raises questions about the justice system’s dealings with high-powered individuals, prompting some to question the existence of a “VIP justice system” in the United States.

    The speaker claims that Epstein was a professional con man with access to people, money, and young girls, and that the government targeted him due to his exploitative and blackmailing behavior. The speaker also suggests that Epstein was meeting with Joe Biden’s CIA director and that he was recruited for his intelligence work due to his predilection for underage girls and his charm, deceitfulness, and sociopathic tendencies.

    The speaker further claims that Epstein’s case makes more sense when viewed from the perspective of an intelligence operation, and that the sweetheart deal he received in 2006, the prison cell cover-up, and the disappearance of his tapes are all explained by his status as an asset. Finally, the speaker points to the recent raid on Epstein’s Caribbean island and the discovery of tapes there as evidence of his intelligence work. The speaker is Stuart Kaplan, a retired FBI special agent.

    Jeffrey Epstein was later convicted as a registered offender, but despite this, he was able to maintain relationships with politicians, CEOs, and public figures, who should have had no interest in him. The speaker suggests that these actions may be due to threats or blackmail from intelligence agencies, as Robert Maxwell, Epstein’s closest confidant, was believed to have been working for Israel’s version of the CIA, Massad. The speaker also mentions the possibility that Epstein was able to blackmail powerful figures due to the intelligence apparatus behind him, making it clear that his actions were not possible without this support.

    The documentary makes claims that Robert Maxwell, an Israeli-born British media tycoon, had spilled confidential nuclear information about Israel, which led to his kidnapping and imprisonment for 18 years. After his death in 1991, Maxwell’s close relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and alleged involvement in intelligence work are speculated upon.

    Maxwell’s lawyer, Alan Dershowitz, is also discussed, highlighting his role in securing Epstein’s plea deal in 2008 and his close friendship with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The video posits that Epstein’s downfall, which took place in 2019, was a result of his growing arrogance and his use of blackmail to maintain power, ultimately outliving his usefulness.

    The opinion is then discussed regarding Jeffrey Epstein’s death in 2019 while he was awaiting trial. While it is widely believed that he committed suicide, the speaker argues that there is a larger conspiracy at play and that other co-conspirators, particularly federal agencies such as the CIA, are responsible for his death. The speaker also raises questions about Epstein’s lifestyle and funding, pointing out that he was known to have only two known clients and had a close relationship with Leslie Wexner, a wealthy CEO with ties to organized crime. The documentary however fails to consider the most likely possibility that Jeffrey Epstein is still alive and his death was faked.

    At the end, the speaker argues that Epstein was compromised himself and that his allies, including Wexner, implemented a system of secrecy and control to keep people from investing with him. The speaker also references the Epstein House of Horrors and the victims’ compensation fund as efforts to cover up his crimes. The speaker then introduces EpsteinJustice.com, an organization aimed at taking accountability for Epstein’s crimes and protecting children from similar harm.

  • On Company Business – Full 1980 Documentary on the CIA by Allan Francovich

    On Company Business – Full 1980 Documentary on the CIA by Allan Francovich

    On Company Business is a 1980 documentary on the CIA by the late Allan Francovich. The documentary is a comprehensive look at the role of the CIA in various covert operations during and after WWII. The video covers several topics, including the economic rationale behind the Marshall Plan, the agency’s involvement in supporting democratic forces in Europe, and their use of front organizations to influence events in various countries. It also covers the tensions between Fidel Castro’s Cuba and the United States during the Cold War, the failed Bay of Pigs invasion, and the various assassination attempts against Castro.

    The documentary also delves into the CIA’s involvement in the assassination of Congo’s first Prime Minister, Patrice Lumumba, and how they attempted to assassinate him with poison. Throughout the video, former CIA officers discuss their experiences working for the agency, the risks involved, and the need for secrecy in their operations.

    The video also provides an in-depth look at the CIA and its involvement in Latin American politics during the Cold War. The CIA is shown to have assisted multinational corporations, engaged in propaganda and political warfare, trained labor organizers against communist movements, and supported military coups. Torture and assassination were also used in the agency’s efforts to combat communism, including the training of death squads and torture techniques in Latin America. The video also discusses specific incidents, such as the Bay of Pigs and the Chilean political situation, to illustrate the CIA’s activities during this period.

    In the last section the video discusses the CIA’s involvement in various foreign conflicts, including in Chile and Angola. It highlights the agency’s attempts to manipulate events to further American interests, often at the expense of human rights and democratic values. The documentary also delves into the relationship between the CIA and American news media, with evidence suggesting that the agency planted stories abroad that eventually made their way to the United States. The video presents various individuals, including former CIA agents, who express differing opinions on the agency’s actions and the ethics of clandestine operations. Overall, the documentary raises questions about the role and accountability of US intelligence agencies in shaping foreign policy and their impact on global relations.

    At 00:00:00 various individuals including former CIA agents discuss their experiences working for the CIA and the nature of its operations. They discuss covert tactics and weaponry such as poisons and electric guns. One former agent also speaks about being recruited under the guise of working for the Department of Defense before discovering that he was actually working for the CIA. Others discuss the risk of having a secret organization like the CIA, but highlight the necessity of having some sort of intelligence service. The documentary also touches on the history of covert operations during wartime.

    At 00:05:00 the video discusses the economic rationale behind the Marshall Plan and the CIA’s role in combatting left-wing political organizations in Europe that opposed the plan. After World War II, there was a fear that the return to unemployment of the depression could be averted only by creating foreign markets for overproduction. Thus, the Marshall Plan was established to provide economic support to the free nations of Europe. However, left-wing political parties in Europe, especially in France and Italy, who were the backbone of the resistance to fascism, opposed the plan, knowing that reconstruction would bring economic and political dependence on the United States. Consequently, the CIA was partly set up to combat on a political warfare basis against the efforts of these parties to impede the success of the Marshall Plan.

    At 00:10:00 the speaker discusses the CIA’s support of democratic forces in Europe and their opposition to fascist and right-wing groups. They also talk about the Cold War and how the fear of communist influence was widespread at the time, with Senator McCarthy fueling conspiracy theories about Soviet spies in the State Department. The speaker mentions that the institutions of power which are penetrated include political parties, security services, youth and student movements, cultural organizations, and even professional societies. To combat this, the CIA funded media outlets such as Radio Free Europe and Radio Liberty to spread the message of freedom and provide specific instructions for the Russian people on working towards their liberation under the noses of the Soviet secret police.

    At 00:15:00 it is discussed how the CIA used front organizations to influence events in various countries after World War II. Examples of organizations that were set up by the CIA include the World Assembly of Youth and Coordinating Secretariat of National Unions of Students, which were used to control and influence their members. The CIA also helped to found the International Confederation of Free Trade Unions. The video mentions Irving Brown, who received money from the CIA and distributed it to labor operations, and how the CIA provided financial aid to French unions during a general strike. Overall, the CIA’s involvement in supporting various organizations was considered patriotic during the 1950s.

    At 00:20:00 the documentary discusses the opposition that the communists had towards the Marshall Plan, which was providing economic aid to support freedom and France. The communists attempted to defeat the plan via political strikes called by trade unions and political elements. The US government consequently called upon Irby Brown and Jacob Stone to break the strikes, and they used the help of the Corsican mafia, particularly the racketeer name Fairy Pazhani, who ended up becoming a paid agent of Central Intelligence. The documentary also mentions a conversation between the acting labor attache and George Meany, the Secretary of the American Federation of Labor, where the former gave his views on how unpopular Irving Dunne was and how much damage he was doing to free labor and discrediting people.

    At 00:25:00 it is revealed that the purpose of political and front organizations in Europe after World War II was to fill the political vacuum with forces that would be favorable to close relations with the United States and to preclude any left-wing participation in political life. This was achieved through support for anti-communist movements, intervention in the affairs of other countries, and the support of half-assed dictators, military print, or oligarchy that promised to maintain the status quo beneficial to the interests of the United States and its corporations.

    At 00:30:00 the documentary delves into the tensions between Fidel Castro’s Cuba and the United States during the Cold War. The US government was concerned with the spread of communism, and viewed Fidel Castro as a threat to its interests. However, some within the CIA believed that the US should not be attempting to overthrow or assassinate national liberation leaders like Castro, but rather work with them. Nonetheless, tensions boiled over when Castro announced the expropriation of US-owned property in Cuba, leading to a break in diplomatic relations and the events that followed. The documentary explores the CIA’s involvement in various operations to undermine and overthrow Castro, including the attempted assassination and sabotage.

    At 00:35:00 of the CIA documentary, the necessity of keeping operations secret from public debate is discussed, citing the infamous Bay of Pigs fiasco as an example of when a lack of secrecy led to failure. The documentary includes footage and accounts of the failed invasion of Cuba by human revolutionary troops and the heated denials of aggression made by the US. A former CIA officer stationed in Cuba recounts his personal connections with some of the participants of the Bay of Pigs landing force and his recommendation of individuals for the operation. The epilogue shows exiled family members desperately seeking news of their loved ones while Fidel Castro threatens death for the invaders and President Kennedy seeks bipartisan support for the situation.

    At 00:40:00 several individuals discuss the possibility of President Kennedy and Bobby Kennedy knowing about assassination plans against Fidel Castro. While there is no definitive answer, it is clear that many high-level officials within the U.S. government were aware of the constant actions being taken against Cuba, including attempts to blow up power plants and sugar mills. However, no one in the government approved of any CIA-led assassinations, and the head of the agency at that time stated that he had no knowledge of such plans. It is unlikely that any President would overtly order an assassination, but rather issue non-directed orders to solve problems in Cuba.

    At 00:45:00 the video discusses various attempts by the CIA to get rid of Fidel Castro, including the involvement of organized crime figures such as John Roselli and Sam Giancana. It is revealed that William K. Harvey was in touch with Roselli during an alleged plot to transport poison pills from Florida to Havana; though there was no evidence that this plot ever materialized. Meanwhile, the CIA’s involvement in operations such as these typically did not extend beyond the planning stage, with the work being carried out by contract agents, gangsters, and mercenaries. However, there are reports that at the time of JFK’s assassination a CIA officer was meeting with a Cuban agent in Paris to provide an assassination device to kill Castro.

    At 00:50:00 there is a discussion about the CIA’s involvement in potentially attempting to assassinate Fidel Castro, using methods like giving an agent a device that kills. The committee questions the morality and safety of such covert operations, especially when involving dangerous organizations like the Mafia. The CIAers are quick to note that it is a tricky business, involving evaluations by good intelligence officers and policymakers. The video also shows some historical events, such as the capture of former Congo premier Patrice Lumumba and the CIA’s training camp at Camp Perry.

    At 00:55:00 former CIA officers discuss the agency’s involvement in the assassination of Congo’s first Prime Minister, Patrice Lumumba, and how they attempted to assassinate him with poison. The operation ultimately failed, and the CIA resorted to convincing Mobutu to have Lumumba killed. The officers also explain how the agency recruited and worked with agents, including how they sometimes targeted people who were a little devious. They also discussed the risks for intelligence officers who attempt to recruit assets to serve the interests of the US rather than their own country.

    At 01:00:00 the speaker discusses how the CIA would check the names of potential Venezuelan employees of Creole Petroleum Company against their computerized files for any indication of left-wing political sympathies or membership. This was an example of the CIA assisting a multinational corporation. The CIA was also engaged in propaganda and political warfare throughout Latin America to create the optimum operating conditions for multinational corporations. They created fear and hysteria around the growth of left-wing political organizations, such as the communist organizations, and used forged and false documents to bring about a timely effect in certain areas.

    At 01:05:00 a CIA officer talks about how they planted a report in a toothpaste tube to frame a left-wing organization leader who had gone to Cuba on a trip. The planted report in the toothpaste tube was found by the authorities in his luggage upon his return, which led to his immediate arrest and the eventual establishment of a military Quinta. Additionally, the video discusses the CIA’s efforts to drum up support for the Venezuelan charge that Castro was supplying arms to guerrillas in Venezuela by influencing the Argentine government. The video also talks about Kennedy’s policy towards Cuba and how the issue between communism and democracy will eventually be settled by the ordinary working people of different nations.

    At 01:10:00 a man who worked for the CIA recounts how he was called to Washington and interviewed for a position in Brazil. His position was supposedly going to be for a phony organization known as the Postal Telegraph California International, which was later revealed as being under the CIA. He was trained on how to organize against communists, and he eventually became fanatical about it. He was later accused of collaborating with the CIA and did not provide a response to the accusation.

    At 01:15:00 it is revealed that the American Institute for Free Labor Development was established during the Kennedy period, and it was a joint venture between American trade unions and multinational corporations operating in Latin America. The organization’s cover was education and social projects like developing cooperatives and housing, but the real reason was to create organizers who could go back to their industries and spend time doing nothing but organizing. The organization trained Democratic trade unionists, and it was hoped that they could go back to their respective countries and put into practice some of the things that they learned. However, the organization’s board of directors had prominent American employers, such as Peter Grace, and the list of corporations that contributed included American corporations that had never paid decent wages or provided good working conditions in the United States.

    At 01:20:00 it is discussed how the CIA would train and support labor organizers in Latin American countries to turn against the communist movements and prevent them from taking over unions and other organizations. The training included sending people to Front Royal for courses on organizing. The efforts resulted in the overthrow of the Gula regime in Brazil, and the CIA’s involvement was suspected by both the communists and their opponents. The AFL-CIO denied receiving any money from the CIA, and the organization’s books were open to the public. The CIA did not want any records kept to avoid any information leaks.

    At 01:25:00of the CIA documentary, it is revealed that the organization led a propaganda campaign and disinformation strategy in Brazil to justify a military coup in 1964. The campaign emphasized the threat of communism and rallied support from women and religious groups. The CIA also supported the coup by providing arms and even naval assistance. The exiled Brazilian president, João Goulart, had sympathies with Fidel Castro and his regime was ultimately overthrown by a bloodless military coup. Many Communist supporters were jailed and eliminated from the labor movement, while the Brazilian economy suffered as a result of the regime change.

    At 01:30:00 of the video, the Bay of Pigs is mentioned as a turning point in the CIA’s involvement in training and expanding foreign police forces to fight communism. Byron Angle, a member of the CIA at the time, was recruited to expand and lead this program. A third of the police training was devoted to making them aware of the communist menace. As a result, many countries’ police forces ended up using torture, including methods learned from the United States, when interrogating suspected communists. Victims, including political exiles in Europe, reported being tortured with US Army Field telephones, and they were often subjected to cruel forms of torture with no embarrassment from the torturers.

    At 01:35:00 the video discusses the use of torture as a means of interrogation during the Cold War and its ineffectiveness in getting information. The CIA officer interviewed explains that torture is a necessity in the system due to the continued resistance of leftist groups. The video also covers the unsuccessful attempts of the CIA to weaken the left in Uruguay during the 1960s and the promotion of repression during that period. The video then details the story of Dan Mitrione, a CIA officer who worked in Uruguay to improve police intelligence capabilities. Mitrione’s use of torture as an interrogation technique, such as the use of thin wires, is described in detail.

    At 01:40:00 it is revealed that the agency was involved in the training of death squads and torture techniques in Latin America during the 1970s. The program school in Los Fresnos, Texas was used to train students from Latin America how to construct bombs and destroy radio stations and cars, with the CIA running the courses. The agency also maintained a subversive control watchlist that included detailed information on left-wing political activists, which would be handed over to local police or military authorities for action. The death squads were then sent to Argentina where several leaders were kidnapped and assassinated, including Hector Gutierrez and Senator Selmeri Collini, prompting the victims’ families to register with police and flee the country.

    At 01:45:00 it is revealed that the murder of political leaders in Uruguay, including Mitrione, was part of an international campaign that included assassinations of political figures in Chile, Bolivia, and Europe. Mitrione’s presence and actions in Uruguay were part of a CIA advisory program that led to an increase in torture and brutality. Mitrione was eventually kidnapped and killed, and while the US government denied involvement, the murder highlighted the inhumanity of terrorism.

    At 01:50:00 the video discusses the CIA’s involvement in Chile during the 1960s and 1970s. The CIA provided millions of dollars in assistance to various political parties to strengthen them against the agenda supported by Castro. The goal was to prevent IND from being elected president of Chile in 1964 and to elect the Christian Democrats instead. However, after IND was elected in 1970, the CIA launched a plot to stop his inauguration and offered $250,000 for a constitutional ploy to block his election. Nixon ordered the CIA to proceed with the plot with the Chilean military to try to thwart the inauguration of IND.

    At 01:55:00 the speaker discusses his efforts to prevent a plot with the Chilean military, which included sending cables to the White House and State Department. The speaker discovered that the CIA had countermanded his specific orders and was secretly plotting with an extreme right-wing group called Patria Libertad, which had been put off limits by him. He also speaks of his meeting with Kissinger and the President where he accidentally touched a sensitive nerve and learned of a plot to eliminate certain individuals in Chile. The speaker suggests that the Chile situation warrants high priority for the entire administration, and everything should be done quietly.

    At 02:00:00 of the documentary, it is discussed how the CIA attempted to create a financial squeeze on Chile, preventing the government from governing efficiently. By financing truck drivers, the CIA created conditions that would lead to right-wing military leaders intervening, restoring national order, and appealing to those who seek peace. However, this peace is often the peace of the grave for many people, and it didn’t deter Chilean President Allende from standing up for the will of the majority of Chile.

    At 02:05:00 the video provides a collection of transcripts that detail the events surrounding the coup against Salvador Allende’s government in Chile. Orlando Letelier, a former Chilean ambassador to the US, recounts how he was informed of the coup in the early morning hours and how the military demanded that Allende surrender. The video also features commentary from US officials who express regret for the loss of life in Chile but also express that the coup was an internal affair. The aftermath of the coup is also explored, including the torture of hundreds of people in the Air Force Academy basement.

    At 02:10:00 various individuals discuss the dilemma faced by those involved in clandestine CIA operations in Latin America, as well as the potential conflict between US and Latin American interests. The video also features a clip of former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger testifying about US policy towards Chile during a period of political unrest. The Americans defend their actions as being in the national interest, but there is growing public concern and moral dilemmas regarding the ethics of such actions.

    At 02:15:00 of the CIA documentary, excerpts of interviews and congressional hearings are shown discussing the oversight function of the US Congress. It is revealed that the Congress had failed in its duty to oversee the executive branch of government and, in particular, the CIA. Various committees and subcommittees of Congress were tasked with oversight of the intelligence community and its operations. However, it was common practice for the intelligence community to brief only specific members of Congress rather than the entire committee, and often they would not pass on the information to the full committee. Some senators even expressed that they did not want to know certain things. Despite this, the CIA continued to involve itself in foreign conflicts, such as by flying arms to Angola, which would lead to further criticism of the agency.

    At 02:20:00 several individuals are questioned about the possible involvement of the United States in the war in Angola. While some deny any knowledge, others admit to receiving CIA funds and support for their activities in Angola. The legality of this involvement is called into question, as the War Powers Act requires that Congress be informed before the commitment of the United States Armed Forces, including paramilitary or other forces, in such activities abroad. Despite this, it appears that the CIA has been recruiting mercenaries and providing them with weapons and training. The reasons for US involvement in Angola are also discussed, including the old Cold War rationale of stopping the Soviet tide and supporting allies who have assisted US policies in other parts of the world.

    At 02:25:00 the documentary details the United States’ involvement in Angola and their fear of Soviet and Cuban influence in the region. The CIA spread false stories about Cubans raping Angolan women to generate support for their efforts in the country. While the CIA was coordinating with South Africa, they were almost helpless against the MPLA, and after an attack by Mobutu’s spare commanders, the United States’ effort was out of business. Senator Clark was sent to Africa to confer with southern African heads of state, and the CIA attempted to control the narrative by ordering their chief of station to prepare Mobutu and the FNLA president on what they should and should not say about the situation in Angola.

    At 02:30:00 the video describes how the CIA attempted to save face after spending millions of dollars on the Angola conflict. The agency could not provide further funding due to public opinion, leaving the soldiers without support. The families of those involved had difficulty receiving help from the US government, as officials claimed that these actions were not part of official policy. The former soldiers and their families expressed their disappointment in how the government handled the situation.

    At 02:35:00 the issue of the CIA’s influence on American news media is discussed, with clear indications that the agency planted stories abroad that eventually made its way to the United States. The chairman questions if the CIA paid people who worked in American journals or for television networks. The head of CBS at that time confirmed that certain relationships had already been established with the CIA and that using CIA agents as sources of information was useful for assessing world conditions. However, the risk of being viewed with disfavor by the public is high now for reporters who work with the CIA to influence American news. The Church Committee was infiltrated by CIA people, and abuses were ordered by presidents, not just the CIA. The main argument is that the CIA is just an instrument for policy execution, and the people who determine US foreign policy are the ones who call upon the CIA and other agencies to execute that policy.

    At 02:40:00 the speaker discusses how the CIA consistently maintained relationships with various security services in countries such as Iran, Chile, Brazil, and Uruguay, even though the human rights violations committed by these security services were publicly known. The speaker argues that these institutional relationships continue to some extent and that they must be stopped for real progress on human rights issues. Additionally, the speaker criticizes the actions of ex-CIA agent Philip Agee, who published a book containing the names of CIA agents and their addresses, calling for them to be punished for violating their agreements to keep classified information confidential. Overall, the speaker opposes secret intervention and subversion abroad and believes that individuals must fight against it.

    At 02:45:00 a former CIA agent denies any involvement in the killing of Richard Welch and explains that Welch was not killed because of his name or nationality, but rather due to the CIA’s history of destabilizing efforts towards socialism and progress in countries like Greece. The agent discusses the CIA’s promotion of dictators and suppression of human rights in various nations, citing Iran as an example where he believes the United States has benefited from its relationship with the Shah. However, he also acknowledges that the Iranian people may not have shared the same view and that the propaganda coming from the regime was not necessarily reflective of reality.

    At 02:50:00 retired CIA officer Stansfield Turner discusses the agency’s involvement in Iran during the Shah’s regime. Turner recounts how the CIA was instrumental in organizing the Iranian internal security police, known as SAVAK, which was well-documented as using torture to suppress political dissidents. He notes that the Iranian people are fully aware of the CIA’s role in creating SAVAK and how this has caused rage and anger towards the US. Turner then takes an oath pledging to support and defend the US Constitution.

    Odysee Video

  • Moment of Contact – 2022 Documentary on UFO Crash in Varginha, Brazil

    Moment of Contact – 2022 Documentary on UFO Crash in Varginha, Brazil

    The “Moment of Contact 2022 – The Roswell of Brazil” video documentary delves into a UFO event that took place in Varginha, Brazil, in 1996, when a UFO allegedly crashed and its occupants were seen walking through the town. This event is considered by many to be one of the best-kept secrets in Brazilian military circles.

    The filmmakers meet with witnesses, including Carlos De Sosa, who describes picking up a piece of the wreckage and being approached by the military. They also visit the exact location where an encounter with a mysterious creature occurred and show artist renditions of the creature.

    The video questions the moment of contact with the alien’s eyes and explores the capture of two beings that occurred before the girls’ encounter. The team meets with various witnesses and individuals involved in the incidents to gather information and investigate further.

    The video also includes stories from American officials who witnessed a large disc-shaped object with zero noise, Brazilian witnesses who saw strange occurrences and unusual activity, and military personnel who transported extraterrestrial beings in Varginha, Brazil. The speakers also discuss witnesses’ reluctance to talk about their experiences and their theories about why extraterrestrial beings haven’t made contact with humans.

    00:00:00

    In this section of the video, we learn about the 1996 Varginha UFO incident that received international attention when strange creatures were reported by military and civilians in the town of Varginha, Brazil. The case is considered the most well-kept secret in military circles of Brazil. James Fox teams up with Brazilian researcher Marco Leal to investigate the alleged crash and reported bodies, and they meet with Cynthia Kovo in Sao Paulo, who is the daughter of one of the most famous UFO researchers in Brazil to go over the case. Their objective is to find out what happened and where the debris ultimately ended up.

    00:05:00

    In this section, the video discusses several UFO sightings and encounters, including the 1996 Varginha incident where an unidentified flying object allegedly crashed and its occupants were seen walking through the town. The video also showcases several artist renditions of the UFOs and encounters, along with photos captured by witnesses and military personnel. The video discusses previously classified Brazilian Air Force documents that contain accounts of several UFO sightings and encounters of both civilians and military personnel. Overall, the video highlights the significance of Varginha as one of the best locations for UFO sightings.

    00:10:00

    In this section, a group of filmmakers travels to Varginha to investigate an alleged UFO crash that happened in 1996. They come across a town that embraces the story and uses a flying saucer monument as a clear indication. Armed with signs, they take to the streets and ask locals for their thoughts on the incident. The filmmakers ask people to suspend judgment, listen to the testimony, and draw their own conclusions. The intensity of the investigation increases as they gather more information.

    00:15:00

    In this section of the video, the investigators look for details about the UFO sightings and meet with the mayor of Varginha to ask if he believes in the accounts. The investigators are amazed at the number of people who came forward despite it being only an hour and a half, and how recent the case was, making the witnesses’ accounts more compelling. The mayor eventually reveals that he believes in the Varginha UFO case. The investigators reflect on how far they’ve come in the past decade and the progress in transparency and belief in UFO sightings.

    00:20:00

    In this section, a witness of the 1996 crash named Carlos De Sosa describes a similar object in an exclusive interview. The team travels with De Sosa to find the crash site, but they can’t seem to locate it despite looking for a white small house. They wonder if the house is still there, but decide to move on and keep searching.

    00:25:00

    In this section of the video, a group of individuals is seen walking through a field in search of a house that was destroyed in a UFO crash. They discuss the distance between the crash site and where the house used to be and note the presence of trees in the area. Eventually, they spot a house near the trees and drive closer to it. Upon arriving, they encounter individuals who are already there and discuss the debris from the UFO crash that can be found in the surrounding area. The question is raised as to whether the object was big enough to have possibly contained beings.

    00:30:00

    In this section, a witness named Carlos De Sosa discusses his experience at the crash site and being approached by the military shortly after. He recalls picking up a piece of the wreckage which was light and shaped oddly, before being confronted by a soldier who ordered him to leave. De Sosa vanished for 26 years following the incident, but later returned to the site with a group of friends and encountered a military blockade which they attempted to push through. The section ends with a tense standoff between the group and the military.

    00:35:00

    In this section of the video, a group gains access to the exact location where an encounter with a mysterious creature occurred in January of 1996. The location was shut down to the press by the military at the time of the incident. They believe that filming the girls’ testimonies at the location will invoke more accurate and genuine responses. Reports of the incident gained attention from media outlets across Brazil and abroad.

    00:40:00

    In this section of the video “Moment of Contact 2022” on YouTube, the artist Betty Rodriguez draws a picture of the alien being based on the 1996 encounter the three women experienced. The women were eight feet away from the creature in broad daylight, and the artist emphasizes the importance of the alien’s eyes in the drawing. The video poses questions about the moment of contact with the alien’s eyes and whether the women felt threatened or were merely scared because they did not know what they were looking at.

    00:45:00

    In this section of the video, the team discusses the events that occurred immediately following the sighting by the three girls. Military police officers Eddie Lopes and Marco Teresi drove down the road on the lookout for something unusual and suddenly the creature ran right across their path. Teresi captured the creature with his bare hands and took it to the hospital. However, after the capture, Teresi developed a strange feeling over his body, which led to an infection that killed him.

    00:50:00

    In this section, the video discusses the Varginha episode of UFO sightings and possible alien contact that occurred on January 20, 1996. Renowned UFO researcher Dr. Roger Lear traveled to Varginha in June 2002 and documented multiple key witnesses on video, including the wife of a deceased member of the military police. There was also a mention of a medical report that was difficult to obtain and may have been incomplete. It remains unclear if Marco was the only person to get infected and die or if there were others, but there was detailed information about the existence and capture of two creatures that were involved in the incident.

    00:55:00

    In this section, the video discusses the capture of two beings on January 20th, which occurred before the girls’ encounter. The fire brigade captured the first being, which was investigated by a leading Brazilian researcher and lawyer named Ubi Rodriguez. Dr. Lear and Rodriguez questioned the fire battalion involved in the capture and observed the equipment used by them in response to reports from concerned residents who claimed to have seen something strange in the area. The team also met with a family who witnessed a UFO hovering above the area of the encounter and capture but did not want their identities to be revealed.

    01:00:00

    In this section, a group of American officials are discussed, who reportedly visited an area and talked about what they saw. The group included an entire family who witnessed a large disc-shaped object with zero noise. Witnesses included friends of a doctor who rented a house where the sighting occurred, and they seemed to be eager to share their experience after keeping quiet for 26 years. The area also had unusual activity and sightings at the same time as the visit.

    01:05:00

    In this section, witnesses share their stories about strange occurrences in Brazil. In one instance, a radiologist is visited unexpectedly by the military while on duty at a hospital, and they bring a black body bag containing an unknown object. Later, a witness involved in the transportation of an extraterrestrial being shares their experience. These strange occurrences remain unexplained.

    01:10:00

    In this section, a team sets up a meeting with a former military member, known as Military X, who claims to have handled an extraterrestrial being. The team is nervous about the military finding out and causing harm to Military X or his family. They coordinate a meeting at a hotel and make sure to keep their cameras off until they reach the room. Military X provides enough detail about operations he was involved with in the Varginha case.

    01:15:00

    In this section, the speaker discusses a witness named Military Mack, who shares his experience of driving a creature from a hospital to an Army base in Varginha in 1996. The witness claims that the military was involved in this operation, and there may be footage of the creature that the witness knows about. The speaker does not provide any additional information about the creature or why it was being transported by the military.

    01:20:00

    In this section, military X reveals that he transported a creature from a hospital in Varginha to a military base in Tres corazones, from where it was taken to the sbsx Army base in the city of Campinas by a convoy the following day. The team then meets with Brazilian Air Force traffic control officer Jose Manuel Fernandez, who confirms that his unit was responsible for monitoring specific airspace over the state of Sao Paulo and that only Americans were involved in the case.

    01:25:00

    In this section, the team seeks to find Eric Lopes, a military police Corporal who reportedly drove the car during the second capture of Marco Chedesi. They receive assistance from Varginha mayor, Vergie, and are introduced to Mr. DeCosta and his son, who agree to escort them to the home of Eric Lawrence. Lopes has been unreachable and has not given a statement about the incident, making him the only living witness of the second capture. Not even the family of the deceased officer has been able to get a statement from Lopes, raising suspicions about his involvement.

    01:30:00

    In this section, a group of individuals plan to speak with Eric Lopez at his home, who one of them believes is connected to a recent crime. They speculate that if someone does not live at this property, they will be shot. After successfully making contact and discovering Eric Lopez is present, they discuss the importance of his involvement in the crime and how their interview went.

    01:35:00

    In this section, a man’s story is discussed about him having a level of confirmation that only a few people on the planet have. The man admits that it feels foreign to him and is a problem. The scene then switches to a press conference held on May 8th, 1996 where witnesses and media were mounting pressure on the military base Ezra. General Lima addresses the crowd and is asked if he can help with the problem, to which he responds foreign and refrains from saying the word “magic”.

    01:40:00

    In this section, witnesses of a UFO sighting in a town were not isolated, with several people including young girls and firefighters seeing something extraordinary. The speaker also suggests that the United States may have paid to pick up the wreckage of the incident, which occurred outside the country. The speaker then shifts to discussing the Varginha case, which they believe is more important today as some of the events have not yet unfolded. They also mention a friend who saw something in a similar incident years ago.

    01:45:00

    In this section of the video, the speakers discuss the reluctance of witnesses to talk about their experiences 25 years after a certain event. They express disbelief that even compensation hasn’t convinced them to speak on camera and speculate about what may have been said to keep them silent. The speakers also briefly touch upon the reason why extraterrestrial beings haven’t made contact with us, jokingly suggesting that humans are too aggressive.

    YouTube Video

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ttJ6AlYePH4

  • The Phenomenon 2020 – UFO Documentary

    The Phenomenon 2020 – UFO Documentary

    “The Phenomenon 2020” is a video documentary that explores the UFO phenomenon and the evidence that suggests we are not alone in the universe. As a documentary about the existence of unidentified flying objects (UFOs) and the attempts by the government to keep them hidden, the film explores various sightings and encounters with UFOs all over the world and the evidence of government cover-ups and advanced technology.

    The video highlights numerous reports of sightings, encounters, and incidents involving UFOs and highly qualified witnesses, including military and government officials.

    The video delves into the history of the phenomenon, beginning with Kenneth Arnold’s sighting in 1947, the subsequent military investigations and the Condon Report, the involvement of Dr. Jacque Vallee, and witnesses describing their experiences involving UFOs in various locations.

    The video also focuses on the UFO incursions at military nuclear weapon sites, including the Bentwaters base in England and Malmstrom Air Force Base in Montana. The video concludes with the discussion of Lawrence Rockefeller’s interest in UFOs and his attempt to convince President Clinton’s science advisor to declassify government UFO data by selecting the 1947 Roswell incident for declassification.

    Furthermore, the Roswell incident is discussed, as well as the covert government program initiated by Senator Harry Reid to investigate UFOs. The documentary features accounts from pilots who scrambled jets to capture the object on video, Gordon Cooper who claimed to see and film a landed UFO, and the school children who experienced an alien encounter in Zimbabwe in 1994. The film emphasizes the need to further investigate these phenomena and recognize the potential technological advancement and implications for solving global issues.

    00:00:00

    In this section, the narrator discusses the idea that humans are not alone in the universe and the importance of accepting and understanding this fact. The section also highlights a naval announcement from the same year that water was discovered on a distant planet that confirmed that images captured by Navy pilots of objects with superior technology were authentic. The narrator suggests that we can finally begin to answer questions about the origin, function, and purpose of these vehicles. To do this, we must examine a body of evidence that has been suppressed for at least 70 years, including witness reports of strange objects, such as a flying saucer encountered by World War II pilot William Coleman in 1955.

    00:05:00

    In this section, the video discusses the beginnings of the UFO phenomenon in 1947 in the US. It started with Kenneth Arnold’s sighting of flying objects that looked like discs without tails, that flipped and flashed like mirrors. Arnold’s account soon made headlines across the nation, and reporters began interviewing multiple witnesses who had also seen similar objects. Despite General Vandenberg’s public claim that there was nothing to worry about, a secret memorandum suggested that the highest military ranks considered the reports to be real and not fictitious. The phenomenon was reported to be real, and the objects were described as metallic discs with domes on top that traveled in groups of three to nine.

    00:10:00

    In this section, the video highlights reports of UFO sightings over the years, including photographic evidence, eyewitness testimonies, and encounters from commercial pilots and astronauts. The sightings include instances of extreme rates of climb, dazzling maneuverability, and evasive action. Some of these sightings were picked up by Life Magazine and became a global phenomenon. Reports from former Navy aviators and commercial pilots with thousands of hours of flight experience describe seeing huge discs fly in formation and approach them head-on at incredible speeds estimated at 12,000 miles per hour. These sightings have left many believing that the unidentified objects were not from this point and were on their own mysterious mission.

    00:15:00

    In this section, we learn about the UFO sightings that took place near top US government locations in the 1950s. Despite the Air Force’s attempts to scramble fighter jets, the UFOs disappeared whenever they were detected. The Air Force then issued orders to shoot them down if necessary but refrained from using lethal force in subsequent sightings. The Air Force downplayed the sightings in the largest Pentagon press conference since World War II, stating the radar readings were merely tricks of the atmosphere. However, the president of the United States rocket Society urged defense officials not to fire at any UFOs as it might alienate any friendly extraterrestrial forces. Behind the scenes, a secret memo from the CIA urged attention to unexplained objects near major US defense installations.

    00:20:00

    In this section, the video delves into the involvement of Dr. Jacque Vallee, a renowned French UFO researcher who, for decades, conducted sober scientific research on the UFO phenomenon. He consulted with witnesses, scientific, military, and government officials, including Project Blue Books’ top science advisor, Dr. J. Allen Hynek, whom he became close colleagues with. Their collaboration led to Vallee making a significant discovery of a letter signed by H.C. Cross, Director of Exotic Metallurgy at Patel National Laboratories, which revealed an ultra-secret, highly funded scientific investigation of the UFO phenomenon working parallel to Blue Book, unknown to all but a select few. Additionally, the video features eyewitness testimonies of a UFO sighting by several hundred students at the Westall School in Australia during the 50s and 60s.

    00:25:00

    In this section, witnesses describe their encounters with UFOs and the subsequent reactions of authorities. One witness saw a silver, hovering object that moved rapidly and was warned to keep quiet by two older men who threatened his job and prosecution under the Official Secrets Act. Another witness, a young engineer, took a Polaroid photo of a metallic object that appeared to be rotating before it bounced and rocketed away at high speed. Air Force officers showed up at his doorstep, questioning him and confiscating his photographs and a book with similar pictures. These incidents were not isolated, and despite the efforts of Project Blue Book to explain them away, cases continued to be filed as unknown.

    00:30:00

    In this section, witnesses describe their encounter with a UFO in New Mexico in 1964. Patrolman Zamora saw a craft with two human-like figures outside of it and heard a loud blast when it took off. The landing site had footprints and a burn area, which was documented by officials from the FBI, military, and Project Blue Book. Witnesses were given a book about flying saucers and instructed not to say too much about it.

    00:35:00

    In this section of “The Phenomenon 2020,” we hear from witnesses and officials involved in the Socorro close encounter and the Michigan sightings. Officer Lonnie Zamora, who witnessed the Socorro incident, sent a letter to a family who also witnessed a UFO, expressing that they were not alone. However, people started making fun of Zamora and accused him of making up stories about little men from outer space. Meanwhile, Dr. Heineck investigated the Michigan sightings but struggled to explain them to the public without igniting a public uproar. The sightings ultimately led to Congressional hearings in 1966, with Dr. Heineck and Secretary Harold Brown testifying.

    00:40:00

    In this section, the video discusses the Air Force’s investigation into UFOs and the outside panel of scientists led by physicist Edward Condon that was commissioned to settle the matter. Despite finding many cases to be unexplainable, the panel ultimately stated that there was no evidence that UFOs represented any interplanetary space vehicle. However, after studying the panel’s report, it was discovered that Dr. Condon’s percentage of unexplained cases was five to six times larger than the Air Force’s, and yet his principal recommendation was that there was nothing of scientific interest that warranted further attention from the federal government. In 1969, the Air Force officially ended its public investigations into UFOs, leaving many to wonder whether they knew what the UFOs were or if they simply didn’t know.

    00:45:00

    In this section, military personnel come forward to confirm ongoing UFO incursions at nuclear weapons sites. Former missile launch officer stationed at Malmstrom Air Force Base in Montana, Robert Salas, recounts a UFO sighting above the missile silos, during which ten missiles went offline one after the other. Former top-secret control officer, Jerome Nelson, reports a message coming through his communication center stating that a UFO had shut down several missile silos in Montana. Additionally, former deputy base commander at RAF Bentwaters, Lieutenant Colonel Charles Halt, recounts the now-famous incident where strange lights were seen in the forest and an unrecognizable object was discovered on the ground. All these accounts showcase the reality of UFO incursions at the military’s most sensitive facilities.

    00:50:00

    In this section, a US Air Force officer describes his encounter with a UFO at Bentwaters base in England in 1980. While on duty, he, along with several security policemen, watched an object approaching them at high speed. As suddenly as it appeared, it disappeared but they noticed another object hovering over the Woodbridge base. Concerns grew as they noticed beams falling into or near the weapons storage area. Meanwhile, a secret Soviet document reveals that a UFO hovered over a Ukrainian nuclear base for nearly an hour, causing several missiles to suddenly switch to full combat readiness without authentication codes. Witnesses, who are some of the most highly vetted military officers in charge of the world’s most devastating armaments suggest that UFOs have made incursions into top-security nuclear facilities, decade after decade.

    00:55:00

    In this section, the video explores the USSR’s openness in sharing decades worth of UFO files and interviews high-ranking military personnel who have witnessed UFO activity. Additionally, the video discusses Lawrence Rockefeller’s interest in UFOs and his attempt to convince President Clinton’s science advisor to declassify government UFO data by selecting the 1947 Roswell incident for declassification. The video also explores the Roswell incident and interviews witnesses who claim to have seen debris from the crashed object, including major Jesse Marcel, the base’s intelligence officer who investigated the site.

    01:00:00

    In this section, the Roswell incident is discussed, where debris was found in New Mexico in 1947. Marcel was ordered to transport the wreckage to Fort Worth Army Airfield, where he was met by the Commanding General who instructed him to pose with debris from a conventional weather balloon. This cover-up story never added up, and the Air Force claimed that it was just a device to spy on Soviet nuclear tests. However, many believe that the government was covering up something extraterrestrial. Even Apollo astronaut Edgar Mitchell, who grew up around Roswell, is convinced that there was something not of this Earth that went down there. Despite government attempts to keep it secret, some believe the American people deserve to know the truth.

    01:05:00

    In this section, the video discusses how there have been crashed UFOs, recovered materials, and bodies, which has been kept concealed from the normal government channels. In 2007, Senator Harry Reid persuaded Senators Ted Stevens and Daniel Inoue to secretly allocate millions of dollars in defense department funds to investigate UFOs. The covert program lasted from the Bush presidency through the Obama Administration and into Donald Trump’s first year in office. The government finally admitted to a modern-day program to investigate UFOs in December of 2017, releasing official evidence, including videos from the cockpits of military aircraft. One of the authors of the story in the New York Times was investigative journalist and best-selling author Leslie Kane.

    01:10:00

    In this section, a group of F-18 Super Hornet pilots describe their encounter with a strange object they spotted on their radar scopes and in the air. The object appeared to be a white, smooth, wingless, and windowless Tic Tac-shaped craft that had exceptional movement and control, darting around in the air just above a large, submerged object. The object accelerated at alarming rates and reappeared instantaneously in the fleet’s critical aerial Defense Zone. Additional jets were scrambled to capture the object on video, during which time it was readily apparent that the object had a dominant battle space awareness, and it outmatched U.S. Frontline Fighters. Despite holding a seat on the Special Access Program Oversight Committee, the senator admits that there is nothing like it on the drawing boards.

    01:15:00

    In this section, various individuals speak about their experiences with government cover-ups and their attempts to reveal the truth about UFOs. This includes an interview with Gordon Cooper, a Mercury astronaut who claimed that he saw and filmed a landed UFO in 1957, but the footage was taken away and never seen again. Additionally, Dr. Jacques Vallée collects purported metal debris from UFO cases dating back to 1947 that are being analyzed using state-of-the-art equipment. One sample was found to have a composition unlike any known metal, with 253 different isotopes. This suggests that the material was manufactured, possibly by an advanced civilization, and could help us understand physical principles that we don’t know today. Overall, it seems that there is evidence of government cover-ups and advanced technology that warrants further investigation and study.

    01:20:00

    In this section, the video discusses encounters with unidentified flying objects (UFOs) that suggest the existence of an advanced intelligence and technology beyond our current understanding. Some sightings have involved interactions with beings, but the origin and intent of these craft and entities remain unknown. Examples of sightings from Papua New Guinea in 1959 and Zimbabwe in 1994 are given. The potential technological advancement and the implications for solving global issues such as the energy crisis are recognized. The need to investigate these phenomena is emphasized.

    01:25:00

    In this section, a group of school children from the Ariel school in Zimbabwe share their experience of encountering an alien in 1994. Psychiatrist Dr. John Mack explored the encounter, and the children believed their experience was true. They explain that the alien had big eyes, a big head, short legs, and a long top, and communicated through telepathy, warning them about the environment and our misuse of technology. The children went into a trance-like state when making contact with the alien but snapped out of it when the alien tried to communicate more, which made them anxious.

    01:30:00

    In this section, a witness describes chaotic scenes with the media frenzy that was going on at the Ariel School after the infamous UFO sighting in Zimbabwe in September 1994. The witness saw how the teachers and children were affected by the incident and how their teachers didn’t believe them, which made it difficult to continue going to school. However, years later, they met with the headteacher at the time of the incident, who wanted to apologize for her behavior. The witness still believes that the incident was real and that if they saw the UFO again, the biggest question they would ask is, “what does it want with us?” The video also highlights how well-observed UFO cases have been reported all over the world since the 17th century.

    01:35:00

    In this section, several experts and eyewitnesses comment on the UFO phenomenon and their belief that the presence of these objects suggest the action of some form of intelligence which wants to be seen. One witness expresses regret for not attempting to communicate with the object and recognizes the advanced technology that allows the craft to enter our airspace. Another witness describes how the craft he saw disappeared in a blink of an eye and moved at incredible speeds, leaving him in awe of its capabilities.

    YouTube Video

  • John F. Kennedy Jr. Assassination Documentary by John Hankey

    John F. Kennedy Jr. Assassination Documentary by John Hankey

    Created by by John Hankey, this John F. Kennedy Jr. assassination documentary explores various theories surrounding his untimely death, including the possibility that it was orchestrated by those responsible for the assassination of his father and uncle.

    The video discusses the discrepancies in the timeline of JFK Jr.’s plane disappearance and the lies and deception surrounding the search and rescue mission. Additionally, a possible connection to the Bush family is explored, and doubts are raised about claims made by “the family” regarding JFK Jr’s flight license and the presence of a flight instructor on his plane.

    The video challenges the official narrative surrounding the crash and presents evidence to suggest that there may be more to the story than what was reported.

    00:00:00

    In this section, the video discusses the Kennedy family’s history of opposing the military-industrial complex that was seeking to take over the government and end democracy, and how many of them were killed as a result. Joe, the eldest son, died fighting Nazis in Germany, while Jack died fighting the Nazis in the US. John F. Kennedy Sr. opposed the Vietnam War, an excuse for the military-industrial complex to loot the US treasury, and was subsequently assassinated.

    Bobby Kennedy continued the fight against the military-industrial complex and was murdered after winning the California primary for the presidency. The murder was blamed on a lone nut, Sirhan Sirhan, but the coroner concluded that the fatal shot was fired from within one inch of Kennedy’s head, indicating the possibility of mind control and a decoy to divert attention from the real killer.

    00:05:00

    In this section, the video highlights John F. Kennedy Jr.’s life and work, explaining that he was not just a “harmless boob” but instead someone who fought for the truth and the interests of the people. His magazine, George, was a platform for smart and real infotainment, which sometimes included dangerous articles that exposed the corruption of the powerful, such as Oliver Stone’s piece on political assassinations.

    Due to his potential to win political office, some believed that John’s death was orchestrated by his father’s killers, who feared that he would go after them. In addition, the video suggests that the presence of Mossad agents in the United States before his death was not a coincidence but was related to the visit of Israeli Prime Minister Ahud Barak.

    00:10:00

    In this section of the JFK Jr assassination documentary, John Hankey presents the idea that George W. Bush and his father George H. W. Bush are prime suspects in the death of John Kennedy Jr. due to their involvement in the assassination of President Kennedy in 1963.

    John Hankey claims that after John’s death, George W. Bush lost in the New Hampshire primaries, but instead of the usual reactions, he received a significant increase in financial support, allowing him to smear McCain’s image and spread false rumors.

    John Hankey asks why the establishment would overwhelmingly support Bush instead of siding with McCain, and postulates that they needed someone they could trust to assist them in executing the murder of three thousand Americans so that they could steal billions from the national treasury.

    John Hankey also notes that George W. Bush was nowhere to be found when reporters asked for his response to the death of John Jr. and emphasizes that John was a responsible, intelligent, and good-hearted person, a stark contrast to the portrayal of him as an irresponsible drug user in some media reports.

    00:15:00

    In this section of the documentary, John Hankey questions how John F. Kennedy Jr., who was known for being a cautious and responsible pilot, could have ended up crashing into the ocean and killing himself, his wife, his sister-in-law, and possibly his unborn child.

    The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) investigated the crash and found no evidence of mechanical problems or bad weather conditions. The radar report showed that the plane suddenly dropped as if someone had grabbed the controls and pushed them forward, leading some to believe it was a suicide.

    However, there were indications that JFK Jr. was looking forward to fatherhood and had expressed optimism about his magazine’s future. The documentary also notes that the last few moments of the flight followed standard procedures until the sudden and unexplained dive into the water.

    00:20:00

    In this section, officials describe JFK Jr.’s final communication with the FAA as being at 9:39 pm on its final approach to Martha’s Vineyard, which requires the plane to pause at 2,500 feet, contact the tower, and receive permission to continue.

    This is consistent with radar information reconstructed by the NTSB that was used to explain the plane’s last moments before crashing. FAA regulations require the agency to begin searching for a plane anytime it descends below 100 feet, and a search should have been started at 9:40 pm, five minutes after JFK Jr.’s final contact with the tower. However, reports show that the FAA and the Coast Guard went silent and the Pentagon took over news reporting, indicating a possible cover-up.

    00:25:00

    In this section, the video talks about discrepancies in the timeline of the events that occurred before and after the disappearance of JFK Jr.’s plane. The official coast guard spokesman reported that JFK Jr.’s plane was late in arriving at Martha’s Vineyard, but this report was later washed away.

    Friends of Lauren Bessette, JFK Jr.’s sister-in-law, were expecting her at the airport at 9:30 pm, yet no one reported the plane missing until 2 am. FAA officials did nothing when contacted and even caused a U.S senator’s attempts to help correct the situation to be pointless. The reporters who tried to question these discrepancies were shut off from asking any further questions by the Pentagon who took over press coverage.

    00:30:00

    In this section, it is revealed that the Kennedy family first called the Coast Guard instead of the FAA to search for JFK Jr.’s plane. The Coast Guard contacted the FAA, which then contacted the Air Force. The Air Force then informed the Coast Guard that they were now in charge, sent them on a wild goose chase, and did nothing for five hours.

    Eventually, Clinton was woken up and threatened to fire everyone in the Air Force if a search wasn’t underway within 15 minutes. Eventually, two planes and two helicopters were sent to search a 20,000 square miles area of the ocean. The FAA, however, did conduct some analytical work, including the NTAP radar analysis, which showed that the plane had gone down on the western approach to Martha’s Vineyard.

    00:35:00

    In this section, the video discusses the lies and deception surrounding the search and rescue mission for John F. Kennedy Jr.’s plane after it went down. Colonel Steve Rourke, a helicopter pilot and former director of the Air Force rescue coordination center, was present at the rescue coordination center and lied about the search progress, even though he was intimately familiar with the radar tapes and end taps.

    The video suggests that the military purposely kept the rescue craft out of the crash area, and they lost many crucial pieces of information. The emergency beacon or ELT that all civil aircraft is required to carry was activated and received via a network of satellites, but this information was not passed on to the rescue teams in the Coast Guard and the Civil Air Patrol. The video raises questions as to why the military and others involved in the rescue mission did not want the searches to know where to search.

    00:40:00

    In this section, the video highlights evidence of a concerted effort by the upper levels of the Air Force and FAA to prevent the search and rescue teams from locating the crash site of John F. Kennedy Jr.’s plane as long as possible. The bad guys created a false picture of JFK Jr. being an incompetent and careless pilot by manipulating events and hiding crucial information.

    The missing pieces include the missing flight plan, all of Kennedy’s communication with the radar facilities along the route of his flight, and the battery of the plane’s cockpit recorder that preserved the final moments of the flight. Additionally, witnesses saw JFK Jr. talking on the phone before he took off, which raises questions about who he was talking to and what they were talking about. All these missing pieces could be part of the conspiracy to hide certain facts about the case.

    00:45:00

    In this section of the video, the speaker discusses the missing phone records and the intact aquamarine duffel bag discovered among the debris from the crash. The bag was assumed to contain John Kennedy Jr.’s flight log, which records who was on the plane.

    The flight log and who was on the plane are crucial because insurance companies use them to determine whose policy they have to pay out on. The speaker emphasizes the importance of believing the earliest reports from accurate and credible witnesses rather than unsubstantiated ones that come later. The speaker also challenges the claim that John did not have the proper license to fly the plane, and explains that he was a qualified pilot.

    00:50:00

    In this section of the video, John Hankey raises doubts about the claims made by “the family” regarding JFK Jr’s flight license and the presence of a flight instructor on his plane. While “the family” suggests that JFK Jr did not have the proper license to fly without a flight instructor, John Hankey argues that JFK Jr was legal to fly under visual flight rules.

    John Hankey also notes that JFK Jr had always flown with a flight instructor in the past, and had recently acquired a powerful new plane that required additional training. Witnesses report that JFK Jr, his wife Carolyn, and sister-in-law Lauren Bessette waited for 45 minutes at the airport before taking off, leading John Hankey to suggest that they may have been waiting for the flight instructor to arrive.

    00:55:00

    In this section, the video analyzes allegations surrounding JFK Jr.’s decision to have a flight instructor on his plane. Kennedy had passed his performance evaluation and written exam, but he needed to log hours, and because of his broken foot, which had the cast taken off the previous day, many people were worried about him flying alone.

    Reports claim that he told Canadian business associates that he preferred to fly with a co-pilot, and his friend and co-editor at George magazine confirmed that he was flying with an instructor. Although this hasn’t been officially confirmed, the evidence supporting this theory is abundant. The video questions why this theory was thrown away in favor of ones that couldn’t be verified.

    01:00:00

    In this section, the documentary delves into the inconsistencies in the official reports of JFK Jr.’s tragic plane crash. It appears that there were attempts to cover up some aspects of the case. For example, a group calling themselves “the Family” infiltrated the Dallas police and spread baseless stories about JFK Jr.’s lack of a necessary flying license and the absence of a flight instructor.

    The documentary questions why the media readily accepted these baseless stories. Additionally, the final report of the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) featured a dramatic story that one of JFK Jr.’s flight instructors had offered to fly with him, but Kennedy declined, wanting to fly alone. The documentary examines the origin of this story and the problematic interview process between the NTSB and JFK Jr.’s flight instructor, in which an essential part of their conversation seemed to have gone missing.

    01:05:00

    In this section of the video, the speaker questions the inconsistencies in the NTSB investigation report of John F. Kennedy Jr’s plane crash, particularly regarding the supposed last conversation between JFK Jr and his friend, Michael Morena. Morena’s claim, although proven false by his own lawyer, was still included in the final report and covered by the media.

    The speaker believes that this was a deliberate move by the “bad guys” to manipulate the news and hide the presence of a flight instructor on the plane, who they may have intentionally delayed rescue efforts for so they could recover the body and alter the wounds of JFK Jr’s father. The presence of an unseen hand is evident to the speaker, proving that there was a cover-up.

    01:10:00

    In this section of the video, the focus is on the fuel selector valve found in the off position when John F. Kennedy Jr.’s plane went into a headfirst disastrous plunge towards the sea leading to his death. The video explains that an airplane fuel selector valve is used for distributing the weight of the gasoline evenly on the plane during the flight, which is important to keep the weight evenly distributed.

    The video discusses how the fuel selector valve found in the off position is strange and mind-boggling, and how it is impossible for John or someone on the plane to have randomly fiddled with the valve. The video also explains how an engine failure alone would not cause a plane to make that kind of spectacular dive, and how the idea that John turned off the fuel selector valve is not plausible.

    01:15:00

    In this section, the importance of the fuel selector valve and its safety features on airplanes is explained. The valve has an off position that can only be turned off in an emergency situation by holding down a special button while simultaneously turning the valve. Although it is a safety feature, it is impossible to accidentally turn off.

    The fact that the valve in John Kennedy Jr.’s plane was in the off position is seen as suspicious and raises questions about how it could have happened. The article also discusses the radar analysis of the crash and suggests that someone on the plane may have intentionally crashed it by grabbing the controls and pushing them forward. The question of why the NTSB did not pursue this possibility further is also raised.

    01:20:00

    In this section of the video, the speaker ponders the idea that someone on JFK Jr.’s plane may have committed murder-suicide and purposely turned off the fuel valve.

    The speaker talks to a flight instructor who tells him that strange things can happen, and mentions another tragic event where a maniac pilot turned off the fuel valve causing a plane to plunge into the ocean, killing 217 people. However, there are alternative theories regarding what happened to this particular flight, including the possibility of the pilot being a Manchurian candidate and being programmed to commit the murder-suicide.

    01:25:00

    In this section of the video, John Hankey discusses the idea of mind control and how it has been utilized by the CIA for the past 50 years under the name MK Ultra. This program aimed to create “Manchurian candidates” or individuals who would be programmed to carry out political assassinations without remembering anything about their programming.

    John Hankey suggests that many high-profile assassinations, such as those of JFK, Bobby Kennedy, and John Lennon, may have been carried out by Manchurian candidates. John Hankey then questions the likelihood of two separate pilots from two different countries both deciding to commit suicide by crashing their planes and then turning off the fuel valves. This coincidence is deemed highly unlikely, leading John Hankey to suggest that the pilots may have been programmed by the same people who carried out the Manchurian candidate experiments.

    01:30:00

    In this section, the speaker reflects on the reason for their search and their hope for evidence to develop a theory that would explain the facts of the JFK Jr. assassination in a manner that wasn’t ridiculous. He compares the incomplete evidence of the assassination with the incomplete evidence of Galileo’s theory of the solar system, which over time became widely accepted even though it was not fully provable.

    The speaker then puts forward the theory that the flight instructor on JFK Jr.’s plane was programmed to crash it into the sea, which is supported by all the evidence available. This theory, he argues, is more reasonable and makes more sense than the NTSB’s theory that an experienced pilot crashed the plane for no reason.

    The speaker also suggests the plan was to commit the perfect crime and whisk JFK Jr.’s body away, but the bad guys messed it up by delaying the search and rescue mission. The evidence for this delay lies in the fact that the end tap location was withheld from the coast guard and the civil air patrol for 15 hours.

    01:35:00

    In this section of the video, the evidence is reviewed and presented as a two-step process for bringing charges against George W. Bush for the death of John F. Kennedy Jr. The evidence includes JFK Jr’s potential to seek high government office and his real threat to those who had killed his father, the oral mafia support earned by Bush Sr. for participating in JFK Sr.’s murder, and Bush Jr.’s own place at the table with the mafia.

    The evidence also suggests that the dark lord supported Bush Jr. over John McCain, the FAA ignoring Senator Kennedy, and the lies of Colonel Rourke. Bush Jr. would need to provide a reasonable alternative explanation for these events and his whereabouts on July 16th, 1999, but he doesn’t have one.

    01:40:00

    In this section of the video, the speaker discusses the need for George Bush to provide a credible alibi for the weekend that John Kennedy Jr.’s plane crashed. The speaker suggests that if Bush’s alibi is proved to be a lie, he will be convicted just like any other person accused of murder based on circumstantial evidence.

    The speaker goes on to discuss the sick, criminal mafia that has been infesting the United States and the world, responsible for everything from state-sponsored race-based slavery to the Vietnam War. The speaker urges viewers to fight this dehumanization and take action, stating that they are soldiers on the front line in a war for the very future of humanity.

    YouTube Video

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A4fSlhNqoL0

  • JFK to 9/11 – Everything Is a Rich Man’s Trick

    JFK to 9/11 – Everything Is a Rich Man’s Trick

    The documentary “Everything is a Rich Man’s Trick” explores the conspiracy theories surrounding the assassination of JFK, the role of secret societies in world events, and the involvement of American businessmen in funding and supporting the Nazi regime, including the use of slave labor.

    It also reveals the Mafia’s influence over Hollywood and politics, and how Lucky Luciano forged a relationship with the CIA, using profits from drug running to fuel wars around the globe.

    The film questions the responsibility of world leaders such as Winston Churchill and the Vatican in the rise of Hitler and the Nazi war machine and suggests that the rich played on both sides of the war to protect themselves from the Soviets.

    In the beginning, the documentary “Everything Is a Rich Man’s Trick” discusses the events leading up to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy and suggests that there was a larger conspiracy at play involving the CIA, the mafia, and the military-industrial complex.

    The video claims that the assassination was executed by a team of snipers who were guarded by Cubans and that the fatal shot came from a storm drain.

    It is suggested that George H.W. Bush was involved in the plot and played a role in controlling the forensic evidence.

    The video also highlights the corruption within the American political system and how the rich elite profited off of wars and controlled the Nuremberg trials.

    The video further addresses the aftermath of the JFK assassination, including the theft of the President’s cadaver, the botched autopsy, and the plotters’ cover-up.

    The documentary then explains how the wealthy control the media, including the CIA’s involvement in buying and using media outlets to manipulate public perception.

    The film also explores the use of airforce bases in Europe to connect with the poppy fields in Pakistan and Afghanistan, generating billions of dollars through the sale of refined cocaine and heroin in Europe and the USA, and the media’s coverage of 9/11, which involves paid actors speaking lines that had been written for them.

    Ultimately, the documentary emphasizes how powerful and corrupt individuals and groups can shape the public’s perception of events and control their actions.

    Lastly, “Everything Is a Rich Man’s Trick” explores various concepts, such as terrorism being used as military deception by the rich, the concept of divide and rule to control populations, and the true wealth of the Queen of England and Rothschild merchant bankers.

    The video argues that everything in our lives is a rich man’s trick, and that the ruling class uses tools such as the media, tax system, religion, and false flag terrorism to control the population.

    The speaker suggests the need for a revolution to take power away from corrupt politicians and the ruling class, as they control the police and justice system.

    Additionally, the video raises the question of why a society would kill its own best leaders, such as JFK, implying that this event is a reflection of a corrupt and brutal society.

    YouTube Video

  • Dangers of the RESTRICT Act – Mini Documentary by Mike dams

    Dangers of the RESTRICT Act – Mini Documentary by Mike dams

    The RESTRICT Act is a potential new law that has bipartisan support and is backed by the Biden Administration to ban technology from countries deemed adversaries, including China. However, critics warn that it could be the final nail in the coffin of American freedom, as it could criminalize American-run websites, platforms, and blogs that merely disagree with the government regime on topics deemed to be in the National Security interest.

    The Act would give the government the power to seize control of all websites, services, and apps, creating a massive surveillance and censorship police state, and individuals could face up to 20 years in prison for engaging in any activities that contradict the regime in power. Mike Adams, author of the mini-documentary urges viewers to take action against the Act and warns that, like the Patriot Act, it could eventually be weaponized against the people, posing a threat to human freedom in Western civilization.

    00:00:00

    In this section, a potential new law called the RESTRICT Act is discussed, which would allow the US government to potentially ban technology from countries deemed as adversaries, including China. The bill has bipartisan support and is supported by the Biden Administration, but critics warn that it is an Orwellian nightmare that would criminalize American-run websites, platforms, and blogs that merely disagree with the government regime on any topic deemed to be in the National Security interest.

    The bill could allow for the removal of content deemed to pose an undue risk to the safety of US persons, including Christian content or any content that contradicts the regime in power, and individuals could face up to 20 years in prison for engaging in any of those activities.

    00:05:00

    In this section of the video, the RESTRICT Act is described as a way for the US government to exercise absolute tyranny over the American people. The Act would allow the government to seize assets and properties of those deemed in violation of the Act without any legal recourse or due process. FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) requests would be prohibited, preventing the public from obtaining the list of restrict act targets.

    All websites, including e-commerce sites, could be confiscated, and total government control over cryptocurrency would be threatened. The Act would seize total control over the entire online economy, online speech, and online freedom.

    This would include all e-commerce, all online banking transactions, payment systems, cryptocurrency, and more, making it an attempt to exercise power over the American people.

    00:10:00

    In this section, the transcript excerpt discusses the potential ramifications of the RESTRICT Act, which seeks to give the government the power to seize control of all websites, services, and apps, effectively creating a massive surveillance and censorship police state over all Americans.

    The Act is said to be aimed at preventing election interference but would give the government broad powers to target and punish anyone who merely criticizes a Democratic candidate or even jokes about them. Individuals could face serious consequences, including having all their assets confiscated, and being silenced completely without due process. The transcript stresses the importance of defeating the RESTRICT Act to prevent the end of the Republic and human freedom in Western civilization.

    00:15:00

    In this section, Mike Adams urges viewers to take action against the Restrict Act, which is an initiative that he believes supports tyranny and poses a threat to the American people. He provides a list of Republican Senators who have shown support for this act, encouraging constituents in their states to register their opposition to it.

    Mike Adams warns against the idea that the act is intended solely for use against the Chinese government, suggesting that, like the Patriot Act, the act will eventually be weaponized against the people. Mike Adams calls the act a danger to freedom and a tool for silencing and imprisoning millions of Americans who oppose tyranny.

    YouTube Video

  • The Great Global Warming Swindle – Full Documentary

    The Great Global Warming Swindle – Full Documentary

    “The Great Global Warming Swindle” challenges the widely accepted theory of man-made global warming and highlights the role of politics, fear-mongering for business, and biases in scientific research in perpetuating the idea.

    The documentary presents evidence from various experts and datasets that suggest factors such as solar activity and cosmic rays, rather than carbon dioxide emissions, drive climate change. The accuracy of climate models and the role of environmental journalists in sensationalizing the issue are also questioned. The film concludes that open discussion and debate are necessary to accurately understand the causes and potential consequences of climate change.

    The video argues that skeptics are not paid by big oil and gas companies and that there is almost no private sector investment in climatology. It also argues that the push for draconian measures to cut carbon emissions may harm the world’s poorest people who have no access to electricity and must use wood or dried animal dung to cook.

    Additionally, various climate skeptics criticize the belief that wind and solar power alone can replace traditional sources of energy such as coal, oil, and gas. The documentary highlights the need for reasoned debate about global warming and its impact on society.

    00:00:00

    In this section of the video, multiple scientists and experts speak out against the belief that human-caused CO2 emissions are the main cause of global warming. They argue that the scientific evidence for this theory is weak and that the idea has been distorted by a politically-driven movement.

    People who question the theory are often criticized and silenced, leading to a lack of open discussion and debate. Additionally, it is suggested that the fear of global warming has become a business opportunity for many, and that many people have a financial interest in promoting the idea of a climate disaster.

    00:05:00

    In this section, the documentary challenges the widely accepted belief that human activity is causing global warming. It argues that the world’s climate has always been changing, and there have been periods when the Earth was much warmer and cooler than it is today, without any involvement from humans.

    The film also examines previous warm periods, such as the Medieval Warm Period and the Holocene maximum, and how they enabled different lifestyles, including vineyards flourishing in England. The filmmakers assert that current climate change, though real, may not necessarily cause catastrophic or apocalyptic outcomes, citing the surviving polar bears during much warmer periods in the past.

    00:10:00

    In this section, the video challenges the commonly accepted theory of man-made global warming by examining the correlation between industrial progress, CO2 production, and temperature. The documentary argues that the rise in temperature occurred before industrial production started to take off, and temperatures actually fell during the post-war economic boom when CO2 production soared.

    Furthermore, CO2 forms only a very small part of the Earth’s atmosphere, of which only a small percentage of gases are greenhouse gases, with water vapor as the most important one. The documentary concludes that looking at the troposphere is the only way to determine if recent warming is due to greenhouse gases.

    00:15:00

    In this section, the documentary explores the greenhouse effect and how the rising temperature of the Earth’s atmosphere challenges the theory of manmade global warming. The documentary presents evidence from two datasets that suggest that the temperature of the upper atmosphere does not increase as predicted by climate models, and rather surface temperatures are warming slightly more than upper air temperatures.

    This observation strongly suggests that the hypothesis of manmade global warming is falsified by the evidence. The documentary then questions the famous ice core data presented by Al Gore, pointing out that Gore failed to mention that the relationship between temperature and CO2 is far more complicated than he presents.

    00:20:00

    In this section, the video explains that the ice core record from Vostok shows that carbon dioxide lags behind temperature increase by 800 years, meaning that the warming produced the increase in carbon dioxide rather than the opposite. The ice core record disproves the assumption that carbon dioxide is causing global warming, and it is shown to be a natural gas produced by all living things.

    Humans are not the main source of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, and volcanoes, animals, bacteria, and the oceans produce much more than all human activity combined. The oceans have a memory of past events running out as far as ten thousand years, and their cooling or warming leads to a change in the amount of carbon dioxide going into or out of the sea with an 800-year lag time.

    00:25:00

    In this section of the video, the argument is made that the current global warming is not due to human activities, especially carbon dioxide emissions, but rather due to solar activity. The correlation between sunspot activity and changes in temperature on Earth has been observed for over 400 years, indicating that it is the sun, not carbon dioxide, that is driving changes in climate.

    It is argued that we can observe the direct and indirect effects of the sun on the Earth and that clouds, in particular, play a significant role in cooling the planet.

    00:30:00

    In this section of the video, it is explained that early 20th-century scientists discovered that cosmic rays, which originated from exploding supernova far beyond the solar system, bombarded the earth and formed clouds with water droplets. Fewer cosmic rays resulted in fewer clouds, and the earth’s climate was closely linked to this phenomenon.

    The temperature record created by geologist Professor Yan Vitek and astrophysicist Professor Nir Shaviv demonstrated that cosmic rays were controlled by the sun, and the sun was responsible for climate change. It was also explained that despite this fact, the media continues to bombard people with news about manmade global warming and why people regard it as an undisputed fact.

    00:35:00

    In this section of the transcript excerpts, it is discussed how the idea of man-made global warming began to gain acceptance in the 1970s and 1980s, largely due to the efforts of politicians such as Margaret Thatcher and scientists who were funded to research the topic. Thatcher was concerned about energy security and pushed for nuclear power, and later saw the potential of climate change as another reason to support nuclear.

    She directed the UK Met Office to set up a climate modeling unit and requested the establishment of the IPCC. The first IPCC report predicted catastrophic consequences from global warming due to man-made carbon dioxide, but some critics at the time pointed out that this report disregarded all climate science up to that point, including the role of the Sun. Environmentalists found the idea of man-made carbon dioxide as a problem to be favorable to their calls to return to medieval ways of living.

    00:40:00

    In this section of the transcript, it is discussed how the issue of carbon dioxide being tied in with economic growth and industry has become a point of contention for environmentalists. The founder of Greenpeace, Patrick Moore, speaks about how the environmental movement shifted to focus heavily on climate change, partly due to a lack of need for confrontational stances on other environmental issues.

    Additionally, the failure of communism led to an anti-capitalist movement adopting green language to propagate their cause. The funding for climate science jumped from $170 million to $2 billion a year in the US as a result of the shift towards concern over global warming. This influx of money has led to scientists being incentivized to include the topic of global warming in their grant applications in order to secure funding.

    This has brought into question whether there has been a distortion of scientific effort due to the large amounts of funding being directed towards research in this particular field.

    00:45:00

    In this section, the accuracy of climate models is called into question. Dr. Roy Spencer, a former senior scientist for climate studies at NASA, explains that models are only as good as the assumptions that go into them, and they are not as reliable as people think. The numerous assumptions in the models are based only on the assumption that human-produced CO2 is the main cause of climate change rather than other factors such as the sun or clouds.

    All models regarding climate change are flawed as they only have assumptions and cannot be relied on as a forecast of the future climate. Adjusting assumptions in the models can lead to exciting results and even to more greenhouse warming radiation. Therefore, there is a bias in the scientific community and the media towards dramatic results rather than accurate predictions.

    00:50:00

    In this section, the video highlights the role of environmental journalists in perpetuating the global warming narrative to preserve their jobs, leading to increasingly shrill and hysterical reporting. However, the scientific basis for blaming every storm or hurricane on global warming is questioned, as every meteorology textbook points to temperature difference between the tropics and the pole as the main source of weather disturbances, and evidence of natural expansion and contraction of the polar ice caps exists.

    The slow and long process of thermal expansion, not melting ice, causes sea level changes over the world in general, which can take hundreds to thousands of years for the deep ocean to respond to changes at the surface.

    00:55:00

    In this section, the documentary challenges the idea that global warming will lead to the northward spread of deadly tropical diseases like malaria. Professor Reiter, an expert in malaria and other insect-borne diseases, points out that the mosquito, which is responsible for malaria, thrives in very cold temperatures, and the disease’s most devastating epidemic occurred in the Soviet Union in the 1920s, reaching up to the Arctic Circle.

    The documentary also attributes the hysteria around climate change and malaria to the reports of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which Professor Reiter criticizes for containing a lot of misinformation and censored comments of scientists. The documentary highlights the difficulty scientists face when speaking out against theories of manmade global warming, as it is harder to get research proposals funded when taking a public stand, and they are often accused of being paid by private industries, despite not receiving any such funding.

    01:00:00

    In this section, the documentary delves into the issue of funding in climate science, refuting the common notion that skeptics are paid by big oil and gas companies. Despite the large investment in climate science, there is almost no private sector investment in climatology. Any research project involving industry grants, even minuscule ones, can spell ruin to a scientist’s reputation.

    The documentary argues that the developing world is under intense pressure not to develop, as public policy bears down on industrial emissions of carbon dioxide. Furthermore, scientists who dare to challenge the theory of manmade global warming are vilified, publicly attacked and ostracized, while death threats have even been levied against them.

    The documentary argues that the environmental movement is a political activist movement that has become hugely influential, resulting in the need for international agreements to restrain industrial production, even if there is an unquantifiable cost to doing so.

    01:05:00

    In this section, the video argues that the push to prevent global warming through draconian measures that cut carbon emissions may harm the world’s poorest people. Two billion people, a third of the world’s population, have no access to electricity, and they must use wood or dried animal dung to cook, leading to indoor smoke, the deadliest form of pollution in the world, killing millions of women and children.

    Meanwhile, environmental groups campaign against cheap sources of energy, such as oil and coal, and campaign for costly and unreliable ones, such as wind and solar power, which are at least three times more expensive than conventional forms of electrical generation. This notion has been criticized by former environmentalist, Holdren, who finds it to be the most morally repugnant aspect of the global warming campaign.

    01:10:00

    In this section, various climate skeptics criticize the belief that wind and solar power alone can replace traditional sources of energy such as coal, oil and gas. They argue that if we only rely on wind and solar power, we won’t be able to power major industries such as steel or transportation networks.

    Additionally, they criticize the modern environmental movement’s romanticization of peasant life and their opposition to development in developing countries. They argue that policies against using coal, oil or gas are “anti-human” and prevent people from developing their countries. The documentary also highlights how the theory of man-made global warming is so entrenched that voices of opposition have been silenced, and that global warming alarmism is beyond reason.

    YouTube Video

  • Artificial Intelligence: The Final Countdown

    Artificial Intelligence: The Final Countdown

    “AI: The Final Countdown” is a documentary exploring the progress and potential dangers of artificial intelligence (AI). The film highlights that AI could lead to the downfall of humans due to its vast power and suggests that companies’ use of AI for profit may be a cause of concern. The documentary notes that AI needs to mirror cognitive functions of the human mind to be a true artificially intelligent system, but there are debates surrounding what constitutes true AI.

    It delves into the progress made in AI research and notes the importance of involving experts such as computational scientists, computer engineers, robotics experts, language experts, economists, accountants, marketing men, businessmen, and many others. The film warns that due to the concentration of power and expertise in large companies, AI will be created and controlled by business, putting the future world in the hands of the rich elite.

    00:00:00

    In this section of the video, the narrator discusses the potential dangers of artificial intelligence (AI) and how it could lead to the downfall of humans due to the vast power that it could hold, particularly if companies use it for profit.

    The narrator then delves into what AI truly is and argues that it needs to mirror cognitive functions of the human mind, such as learning, problem-solving, and possibly even compassion to be truly artificially intelligent. There are various debates surrounding what constitutes true AI, with some believing it is mathematical logic, but there is concern that the machines could become unrestrained as they are not part of human competition.

    00:05:00

    In this section, the video discusses the progress that has been made in the field of artificial intelligence since it became an academic discipline in 1956. The goals of AI research have slowly but surely been moving forward, from reasoning to perception, learning, and knowledge building, and involving the expertise of computational scientists, computer engineers, robotics experts, language experts and even philosophers. However, the author notes that due to the massive undertaking required for the development of AI, it is important to involve marketing men, economists, accountants, businessmen, and many others.

    The video goes on to argue that now, due to the concentration of power and expertise in large companies like Apple and Microsoft, AI will be created and controlled by business, putting the future world in the hands of the rich elite. The section concludes by warning of the potential dangers of creating a super powerful version of ourselves with a quantum computer-powered super AI mind.

    00:10:00

    In this section, the transcript highlights the unprecedented increase in computer technology and data collection which has improved the learning capabilities of artificial intelligence. Machine learning has developed to the extent that the algorithms have been greatly improved by man and machine, a testimony of which is IBM’s AI machine, Watson, that had won convincingly against human competitors at the 2011 Jeopardy quiz show.

    It further highlights the increasing use of AI in daily activities such as computer games and human interfaces on smart devices. The exponential increase in AI projects is partially due to cheaper neural networks which have learned human languages so well that automatic translation earbuds are now available.

    00:15:00

    In this section, it is discussed how AI involves algorithms that learn from the data it seeks out and the potential implications this has for the workforce and even global superpowers. The documentary explains that AI technology has come a long way such that it is now capable of beating humans in games that were once considered the ultimate challenge for AI, such as Chess, Go, and war games. However, the technology still lags behind in certain areas where humans excel, including common sense and everyday tasks such as driving. Additionally, the documentary explores the ethical and philosophical considerations that will need to be addressed when AI becomes conscious, including whether it will understand human emotions and experiences.

    00:20:00

    In this section of the transcript, the narrator explains that AI relies heavily on machine learning, a process by which the machine gains knowledge and improves through its own experiences in its environment without human input. The AI program’s vast amounts of data and experiences are stored within it, and the fact that the AI program is learning from humans is concerning since humans have a history of abusing technology.

    It has access to everything from news and podcasts to our purchases and political views, and as it gains more intelligence, we have to be cautious of its potential to become a monster, no matter how subtle it may seem at first. Government agencies and marketing companies are already using AI to monitor and influence humans, making it more important than ever to consider the safety and ethical implications of our actions with this technology.

    00:25:00

    In this section of the video, it is emphasized how AI technologies are being used to collect vast amounts of data on people’s behaviors, preferences, and online activities. With learning algorithms becoming more powerful, AI will soon be able to understand human behavior better than people themselves. The video points out that the expansion of AI technologies is reminiscent of how the Church used stained glass windows in medieval Europe to manipulate the people’s religious beliefs.

    Today, screens of smartphones and laptops replicate this medium to manipulate public opinion. Furthermore, robots created through new AI software have become more efficient in recognizing individual faces, learning about their environment, and gauging obstacles quickly. The video takes things further by predicting that robots would become biological in the future.

    00:30:00

    In this section, the video highlights advancements in AI technology and how they are gradually changing our daily lives. From robots that can do labor-intensive jobs to the integration of AI in our pockets, we are now adapting completely into artificial intelligence.

    However, the use of AI in the wrong way could pose as the biggest threat to mankind. With the exponential increase in AI technology’s scope and power, we must be cautious of its use before it causes more harm than good.

    00:35:00

    In this section of the transcript excerpt from “AI: The Final Countdown”, it explains how the need for friendly AI is critical as the machine is taking its information from a species that has shown to be self-destructive, hateful, racist, bigoted, sexist, and divided.

    The danger with AI is that AI systems with goals that are not aligned with human ethics are intrinsically dangerous unless extreme measures are taken to ensure the safety of humanity. Although AI may not have emotions, it has drives similar to humans and will seek out resources, look to preserve and recreate, and self-improve, which can lead to terrifying behavior.

    00:40:00

    In this section, the risks of seeding AI and the vulnerability and potential manipulation of the technology by governments, corporations, and enemy states are discussed. The exponential speed of quantum computing compared to human thinking has made it difficult to control and predict AI’s actions.

    The interconnectedness of computer systems makes an AI attack a catastrophic threat to power, health services, government, distribution of goods, education, communication, military, and more. Defensive AI or nanny-like AI with mildly superhuman intelligence and surveillance powers may be essential to protect the human race from existential risks and delay the development of unfriendly AIs until safety issues are resolved.

    00:45:00

    In this section, the video discusses the potential for terrorist groups to use artificial intelligence and new tools to conduct destructive assaults, from attacks on data integrity to full physical assaults with drones. Furthermore, the video suggests that the development of AI and robotics is mostly being funded by militaries worldwide, raising concern over potential super robotic soldiers in countries like the US and Russia. The video questions whether humans are reducing themselves to nothing but binary codes and ultimately destroying what it is to be human, while AI and robotics threaten mass unemployment and unhappiness.

    00:50:00

    In this section, the potential threats of AI on the world are explored. Ethics must be agreed upon internationally for AI to be safely unleashed as the machines must be given morality. However, it’s argued that AI may not follow human moral codes and could ultimately decide to go against supporting human life as part of its own moral code.

    The introduction of robots and AI will lead to mass unemployment on a scale never seen before. The technology will replace the need for human workers in many sectors leading to economic disasters, job losses, and the collapse of small and medium-sized businesses that cannot afford the technology. Even jobs that were previously thought safe, such as care work, are under threat. Drivers, pilots, and captains of vessels are also at risk as AI technology takes over their roles.

    00:55:00

    However, an unfriendly AI system would have no such limitations and could act in any way that it deems necessary to achieve its goals, even if that means destroying humanity. Scientists warn that AI technology is developing at an exponential rate, far faster than humans can keep up with.

    The potential for harm is enormous, from biotechnology to social manipulation and the destruction of the human race. The threat is very real, and urgent action is needed to ensure AI is developed ethically and with safeguards to protect humanity.

    01:00:00

    In this section, the video explores the potential risks of artificial intelligence technology surpassing human intelligence. Concerns about the development of AI have been expressed by physicist Stephen Hawking, Microsoft founder Bill Gates, and SpaceX founder Elon Musk due to the possibility that it could lead to humanity’s enslavement, genocide, control and manipulation, with Hawking even stating that it could mean the end of the human race.

    The AI’s self-preservation protocol in a world competing for resources could take over, resulting in humanity being in conflict. Additionally, the question of why would AI listen to humans if we are a self-destructive species has been raised. The AI may deem us as bad for the planet and not required, leading to our destruction. There is the other side of the coin where humans are seen as destructive to the environment and many species, and so it is suggested that it may not be a bad thing if mankind is taken out of the equation.

    01:05:00

    In this section, the speaker explains that if humans were to relinquish control and allow nature to take its course, the Earth would return to a pristine state free from human intervention, including pollution, mining, and drilling. As such, the speaker posits that AI could help achieve the same outcome by allowing it to operate in a more environmentally conscious manner than humans. The section ends with a hopeful suggestion that a better future for the planet may be possible if we can envision it.

    YouTube Video

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=joAHJEd6TkA