Miscopy

Tag: Documentary

  • Larry Silverstein Decided to Pull Building 7 on 9/11, BBC Whitewashed It

    Larry Silverstein Decided to Pull Building 7 on 9/11, BBC Whitewashed It

    What did the BBC do back in 2008? They aired a documentary called “The Conspiracy Files 9/11: Third Tower” where they tried to whitewash the mystery of why World Trade Center 7 collapsed.

    Even though BBC pretended to be unbiased, it was clear that they would never air anything suggesting that the official story is wrong, because why bother with facts when we can blindly believe what the government tells us?

    And of course, they conveniently left out parts of Larry Silverstein’s interview where he said “pull it“, because that would contradict their oh-so-trusted story about debris and fires causing the collapse. But hey, who needs evidence when we have good old-fashioned blind faith, am I right?

    And let’s not forget about all the fun demolition terms like “blast shoot blow and pull” that were thrown around, because if there’s one thing we love, it’s making light of a tragedy.

    All in all, this documentary was a true masterpiece in propaganda and will go down in history as a shining example of how not to do journalism. Bravo, BBC. Bravo.

    For Real

    The documentary “The Conspiracy Files 911 Third Tower” aired on BBC in July 2008, attempting to explain the collapse of World Trade Center 7 which wasn’t hit by a plane during the September 11, 2001 attacks.

    Though the program makers attempt to present unbiased evidence, they ultimately push the official story that fire and structural damage caused the collapse.

    The documentary makers purposefully omit a key line from an interview with building owner Larry Silverstein, where he refers to “pulling” the building, but the BBC removes his connection between the word “pull” and the collapse of the building.

    The term “pull” is used in the demolition industry to refer to bringing down buildings. The documentary also mentions other instances where the term “pull” is used with the meaning of demolishing buildings, and it points out that no firefighters were in the building when it collapsed.

    The BBC’s omission of certain evidence suggests that they are biased towards the official story.

    Bullet Points

    • In 2008, the BBC aired a documentary about the collapse of World Trade Center 7 on 9/11.
    • The documentary claims that the collapse of WTC7 is the final mystery of 9/11.
    • The BBC presents evidence for fire and structural damage as the cause of the collapse, but also manipulates evidence to support the official story.
    • The owner of WTC7, Larry Silverstein, is accused of being involved in the demolition of the building, but claims to have meant “pulling” firefighters out of harm’s way.
    • There were no firefighters in WTC7 when it collapsed, and the building fell neatly into its own footprint.

    Let’s Sing Along

    Verse 1:
    In 2008, the BBC aired
    A doc on 9/11 that left some scared
    They aimed to solve the final mystery
    Of why building seven took history

    Chorus:
    But even though they claimed to be unbiased
    Some manipulations were carefully devised
    To promote the official story, it seems
    And hide evidence that didn’t fit their schemes

    Verse 2:
    Larry Silverstein, the building’s owner
    Was accused of being part of a huge donor
    To the conspiracy to destroy the towers
    But the BBC cut out a key line in his powers

    Chorus:
    They removed his connection between “pull” and the fall
    Of the building, as if one affected all
    But the truth is out there, for those who seek
    Just don’t get fooled again, don’t be meek

    Outro:
    Blast, shoot, blow, and pull
    Are words used in the demolition tool
    To bring down buildings, bridges, and more
    But who’s really behind the war?

    YouTube Video

  • In Plane Site – 9/11 Documentary with Pentagon Attack Questions

    In Plane Site – 9/11 Documentary with Pentagon Attack Questions

    We’ve got some serious evidence showing that a 757 didn’t actually hit the Pentagon on 9/11. We’ve got photos of a hole that’s not big enough for a plane and no wreckage to be seen anywhere. Plus, the roof of the Pentagon hadn’t even collapsed yet in some of these photos. But hey, don’t worry about any of that because the government told us what really happened and we should just blindly accept it. Right? Right.

    For Real

    This documentary discusses the events of September 11, 2001, specifically the attack on the Pentagon. The narrator acknowledges that people watching the documentary may fall into one of three categories: those who deny any conspiracy theories, those who are violently opposed to them, and those who are not surprised and knew it all along.

    The idea of conspiracy theories is explored, with the word “conspiracy” being the first part of the phrase, and “theory” being the active word.

    The documentary then examines the events of 9/11, specifically the four events that occurred within an hour and fifteen minutes of one another. The lack of credible claim of responsibility is mentioned, as is the idea that groups or agencies involved in the events would do anything they could to obfuscate or cover up information that might lead to their discovery.

    The focus then shifts to the attack on the Pentagon, with the discrepancy between the damage caused by the 757 that hit the building and the damage that should have been caused by that much fuel being ignited being explored. Photographs of the damage to the upper floors and roof area of the Pentagon are shown, and the lack of evidence of a crater or wreckage is discussed.

    The documentary includes photographs taken before the wall of the Pentagon collapsed, which also show a lack of wreckage, with wire spools and the broken concrete facing of the building being used as reference points.

    The documentary concludes by asking questions about the events of 9/11 and the attack on the Pentagon, and suggesting that the evidence presented should be scrutinized.

    Bullet Points

    • The documentary raises questions about the events of September 11th, including the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.
    • The damage at the Pentagon is deemed inconsistent with the damage caused by a 757.
    • Photographic evidence does not show any recognizable wreckage from a 757 at the Pentagon.
    • The release of only five frames from a security camera at the Pentagon raises questions about the lack of video evidence for the most secure building in the country.
    • The article “From Deception to Revelation” claims that the jet caused a crater 100 feet wide that ripped away the walls of all five stories of the building, but photographic evidence shows a hole approximately 14 to 16 feet across with no wreckage from a 757 on the outside of the building.

    Let’s Sing Along

    In the land of the free,
    Where truth is hard to see,
    There’s talk of conspiracy,
    On September 11th, oh can’t you see?

    The first two towers fell,
    The Pentagon was hit as well,
    But questions began to swell,
    About the tale they used to tell.

    A French website caught our eye,
    Saying something just didn’t fly,
    The photos didn’t seem to lie,
    A 757 didn’t make that guy.

    No sign of wreckage on the ground,
    And a hole too small to astound,
    No engines, wings or seats to be found,
    Just a mystery that’s gone unbound.

    The official story starts to crack,
    As the evidence just won’t retract,
    From the facts we can’t turn back,
    The truth is what we lack.

    So let’s ask the question why,
    Just one camera caught the sky,
    At the Pentagon where so many died,
    Is there more we need to try?

    In theory, it’s just a thought,
    But once the evidence is brought,
    The truth we can’t be fought,
    And justice must be sought.

    YouTube Video