Tag: Feminism

  • Barbie Movie Review by Ben Shapiro

    Barbie Movie Review by Ben Shapiro

    In this 43 minutes long video, Ben Shapiro reviews the Barbie movie and delivers a scathing assessment. He criticizes the lack of jokes, coherent plot, and logical coherence in the film. Shapiro questions the intended audience and attributes positive reviews to the film’s politics rather than its quality. He also critiques the film’s portrayal of gender dynamics, feminism, and relationships between men and women. Overall, Shapiro considers the movie to be one of the worst he has ever seen and predicts that it will lose its appeal after the initial hype.

    As one of the worst movies he has ever seen, Ben Shapiro finds the only redeeming aspect in the production design and costumes. He states that the movie seems to despise Barbie as a fascist emblem. Shapiro questions the intended audience for the film and attributes its positive reviews on Rotten Tomatoes to its politics rather than its quality.

    Ben Shapiro diligently discusses the movie’s portrayal of Barbie as a tool of the patriarchal capitalist system and the failure of her message of female empowerment. He highlights the film’s lack of logical coherence, including the criticism of mommy dolls while also criticizing discontinuing a pregnant doll named Midge. Shapiro questions the intended audience of the movie, as it references complex topics like Citizens United and includes explicit sexual innuendos. He also comments on the film’s portrayal of Ken as secondary and unnecessary, emphasizing the repeated gay masturbation jokes in a movie targeting children.

    Shapiro questions why the film delves into existential themes and politics instead of catering to its supposed target audience of seven-year-old girls. He also disapproves of the film’s portrayal of sexism in the real world, claiming that it perpetuates a victim narrative for women. He highlights his dissatisfaction with the movie’s handling of the relationship between Ken and Barbie, arguing that it missed an opportunity for addressing equality, and instead, the plot simply restores Barbie’s dominance. Furthermore, Shapiro comments on the film’s attempt to portray the board of Mattel as solely composed of men, which he refutes by mentioning the female representation on the actual board.

    Shapiro also highlights how the character inconsistencies undermine the believability of the story. He discusses the themes of feminism and patriarchy in the film, expressing disagreement with the portrayal of women as competent and brilliant, while men are portrayed negatively. He argues that the film fails to present a balanced perspective on these issues and instead relies on lazy writing and obscure jokes. Moreover, he points out the lack of explanation for certain character decisions and plot developments, further undermining the coherence of the film.

    He argues that the film propagates the idea that women who enjoy the company of men have been brainwashed by the patriarchy. Shapiro also points out various inconsistencies in the film’s plot, such as the unnecessary vote held by the Kens and the introduction of random characters like Michael Sarah. He highlights the film’s portrayal of men as all being garbage and the lack of fulfilling relationships between men and women. Shapiro concludes that the filmmakers are insecure about their own script, evidenced by the narrator stepping in to address the shortcomings of the lead actress, Margot Robbie.

    Ben Shapiro emphatically criticizes the movie for its feminist message, claiming that it perpetuates the idea that it is impossible to be a woman in the modern age due to the patriarchy. He argues that the film wrongly portrays women seizing power away from men, when in reality women obtained power through lobbying men. Shapiro also mocks the film’s portrayal of women masking their power under a giggle and pretending to be confused about money. He concludes by ridiculing the idea that women not being able to wear pants is a symbol of men’s control, calling it “claptrap.”

    In the second half of the review, Ben Shapiro discusses the absurdity and lack of coherence in the plot of the Barbie movie. He points out that the movie tries to create conflict between the men by having the women switch partners, but argues that in reality, men would likely just throw a party if beautiful women switched to other men. Shapiro also criticizes the inclusion of a 15-minute long musical number that adds no value to the plot. He sarcastically comments on the portrayal of men and women needing to be separate and the supposed subjugation of women in the real world. Shapiro concludes by highlighting the multiple endings in the movie, each with its own inconsistencies and lack of substance.

    When discussing the ending of the Barbie movie, Ben Shapiro criticizes its attempt to please the core audience of moms and daughters by inserting footage of moms and daughters playing. He argues that the entire movie focuses on portraying men and Mattel as evil and terrible, and that the last-minute nostalgia play falls short. Shapiro highlights the revelation that a woman actually created the Barbie doll as a failed attempt to defy the patriarchy narrative. He also criticizes the movie’s emphasis on Barbie going to the gynecologist as the epitome of being a human woman, noting that it contradicts the film’s own trans-inclusive messaging. Ultimately, Shapiro concludes that the film’s politics overshadow its poor plot, characters, and humor, and attributes its positive reviews to the infusion of feminist ideologies.

    In the end, Ben Shapiro expresses his concerns about the negative messages the Barbie movie promotes. He believes that Hollywood has taken a beloved brand and turned it into a politically divisive film that seeks to separate men from women and undermine basic human values. Shapiro finds it alarming that a movie marketed towards children ends up being filled with angry feminist themes. He predicts that the movie will not do well in China, and ultimately gives it a negative rating, stating that it is one of the worst films he has ever seen.

    YouTube Video

  • Wokefishing – What It Is and How to Spot a Wokefisher

    Wokefishing – What It Is and How to Spot a Wokefisher

    The video discusses the concept of “wokefishing,” where individuals pretend to hold progressive beliefs to attract potential romantic partners. The speaker provides various red flags to watch out for, such as someone claiming feminist or anti-racist beliefs but expressing non-feminist or racist views.

    The video suggests having open and honest conversations with people to determine whether they are genuine or not, but cautions against interrogating others about their beliefs. The video also describes the signs of a “wokefisher,” emphasizing the importance of genuine commitment to social justice issues.

    Lastly, the video argues that while social justice is important, it should not be the only value in a person’s life, and the hyper-woke may be marginalizing themselves out of the dating pool.

    00:00:00

    concerned with social justice issues like racism and sexism, but over time his views started to shift and he began to express some troubling beliefs. This is an example of woke fishing, where someone presents themselves as holding progressive political views to attract potential partners, but their true views and beliefs don’t align with their claimed values.

    The concept of woke fishing has emerged as a result of the growing emphasis on individual agency in dismantling oppressive systems, which has parallels with the Christian view of sin and the constant struggle against it on a personal level. However, some people are adapting to this by pretending to be woke in order to attract partners, but not actually practicing what they preach.

    00:05:00

    In this section, the speaker discusses the concept of “wokefishing,” where someone pretends to hold progressive beliefs to attract others. The speaker lists various red flags to watch out for, such as someone claiming feminist or anti-racist beliefs but expressing non-feminist or racist views. They suggest having open and honest conversations with people to determine whether they are genuine or not, but caution against interrogating others about their beliefs.

    The speaker also suggests trusting one’s instincts and taking things slow when dating others to avoid falling for someone who is not genuine. Ultimately, the speaker sees the trend of “wokefishing” as a form of religious dogma, and encourages people to be accepting of others as humans who may make mistakes.

    00:10:00

    In this section, the video discusses how to spot a “wokefisher”, or someone who pretends to care about progressive issues in order to impress potential romantic partners. According to a psychologist named Mark Travis, there are three signs of a wokefisher: they overly agree with you on every issue, have a superficial understanding of the issues they claim to care about, and use buzzwords and slogans without truly comprehending their meaning. The video pokes fun at the concept of wokefishers and suggests that true compatibility in a romantic partner involves healthy communication and the ability to navigate disagreements.

    00:15:00

    In this section, the video describes the concept of a “wokefisher,” which is someone who presents themselves as woke or socially aware, but is actually insincere in their beliefs and actions. The video argues that many activists online are actually wokefishers, as they may only engage in superficial activism on social media or by attending protests without actively contributing to meaningful change.

    The video also notes that genuine social awareness requires a deep understanding and commitment to racial equality, and that those who seem to be faking their wokeness should be approached with caution. The video ends by highlighting that, while being aware of the signs of a wokefisher can help avoid potential disappointment, genuine progressivism requires more than buzzwords or surface-level activism.

    00:20:00

    In this section of the video, the speaker expresses frustration with the idea that social justice should be the only value in a person’s life, particularly when it comes to dating. The speaker argues that while it is important to share values and a commitment to social justice with a partner, it should not be the only thing that defines a person.

    Additionally, the speaker argues that the hyper-woke individuals may be marginalizing themselves out of the dating pool by being insufferable and unattractive, and that articles like this one can help to raise awareness of these issues. The video concludes with a call to support their work on their website and check out other content.

    YouTube Video

  • The Bernays Dynasty: From Freud’s Mistress to the Father of Public Relations

    The Bernays Dynasty: From Freud’s Mistress to the Father of Public Relations

    The Bernays Dynasty is a fascinating family whose influence can be felt across various fields, from literature to public relations, politics, and feminism. The dynasty’s origins can be traced back to Rabbi Bir Neustedtel, or Baer Lazar, who lived in the German state of Hesse. His sons, Isaac and Jacob Bernays, founded influential dynasties in Europe, America, and Australia.

    Isaac Bernays was the chief rabbi of Hamburg and is credited with combining orthodox Judaism and European culture in education. His younger brother, Adolphus Bernays, was the first professor of German at King’s College, London. Adolphus Bernays wrote multiple books to help English speakers learn German. Hakham Isaac Bernays founded a branch of the Bernays dynasty that remains influential to this day.

    One of Isaac’s sons, Jacob Bernays, became a respected philologist and translator who wrote a biography of Joseph Scaliger, the founder of modern chronology. Isaac’s son Michael Bernays renounced Judaism in favor of Christianity and became a German historian of literature and an important researcher of Goethe and Shakespeare.

    Isaac’s eldest son, Bermann Bernays, had a daughter, Martha Bernays, who became Sigmund Freud’s only wife. According to many of Freud’s biographers, her younger sister Minna Bernays was Freud’s mistress, and it is likely that Isaac Bernays’s granddaughters inspired the Austrian psychoanalyst to study sexuality in depth.

    Bermann’s grandson, Edward Bernays, is often referred to as the “father of public relations“, a newspeak for “father of propaganda“. He was responsible for many famous campaigns, including the promotion of female smoking as a feminist act and work for United Fruit Company related to the CIA-organized overthrow of the democratically elected government of Guatemala.

    Other notable members of the Bernays family include:

    • Thekla Bernays – a suffragette who wrote a decalogue for women that laid the foundations for modern feminism;
    • Karl Ludwig Bernays – a German journalist and associate of Karl Marx who later held several important positions in the Republican Party after emigrating to the US;
    • Doris Fleischmann Bernays – feminist activist and Edward Bernays’s wife, who urged women to keep their names after marriage and was the first married woman to obtain a US passport with her maiden name;
    • Paul Bernays – a Swiss mathematician known for his work in the axiomatic set theory and the philosophy of mathematics who co-founded the philosophical journal Dialectic;
    • Robert Hamilton Bernays – a liberal member of Parliament and close friend of Sir Harold Nicolson, one of the organizers of the League of Nations, and other high aristocrats in the UK.

    Despite the extensive information available on deceased members of the Bernays family, information on the living members of the family is limited. However, the descendants of the Bernays dynasty continue to have a direct influence on the public consciousness of many nations. Mark Bernays Randolph, the great-grandson of Martha Bernays, is an entrepreneur and environmentalist from the United States and is the co-founder and first CEO of Netflix.