Miscopy

Tag: Jews

  • Christopher Bollyn Explains Israeli Connection to 9/11 and Fraudulent War on Terror

    Christopher Bollyn Explains Israeli Connection to 9/11 and Fraudulent War on Terror

    In this YouTube video Christopher Bollyn discusses the deception behind the 9/11 attacks and the subsequent war on terror. He argues that 9/11 was a hoax designed to initiate the war on terror, resulting in the loss of millions of lives and trillions of dollars. Bollyn emphasizes the need to expose this dual deception and put an end to the war. He also discusses the connection between the war on terror and Zionist interests, highlighting the role of Israel in fragmenting Arab states in the Middle East. Bollyn presents evidence of Israeli involvement in the 9/11 attacks and the war in Syria. He concludes by implicating Benjamin Netanyahu and other Jewish neocons in the construction of the 9/11 attacks, linking the evidential trail back to the Israeli government.

    Christopher Bollyn also discuss the role of influential figures like Rupert Murdoch in controlling the media narrative. Additionally, the speaker highlights the involvement of Mossad and Israeli companies in airport security, as well as the inconsistencies and anomalies surrounding the collapse of the World Trade Center towers. Overall, the speaker suggests a dual-deception, where the narrative of 9/11 and the War on Terror is carefully controlled to serve specific interests and calls for people to seek genuine peace and resist the fraudulent war.

    Israeli Connection to 9/11 and Fraudulent War on Terror

    Christopher Bollyn begins by discussing the artificiality of American politics and the control of the media by a small number of corporations. He highlights the lack of reporting on important issues such as the war in Syria and the excessive spending on the war on terror. Bollyn argues that the United States is in a predicament and that there is a need for people to understand that 9/11 was a hoax designed to initiate the war on terror. He emphasizes the importance of exposing this dual deception and bringing an end to the war.

    He argues that 9/11 was carried out to initiate the war on terror, which has resulted in the loss of millions of lives and trillions of borrowed dollars. The speaker emphasizes the importance of resisting this criminal war agenda, as failure to do so would be a betrayal to the nation. They also highlight that the government and media continue to lie about the events of 9/11, suggesting that they are controlled by the same people responsible for the attack.

    Christopher Bollyn then discusses the link between the 9/11 attacks, the war on terror, and the Zionist agenda. He argues that 9/11 was a false flag event designed to push forward the Zionist war agenda and establish Jewish supremacy. Bollyn presents evidence of the connections between individuals involved in the attacks and Israeli intelligence, highlighting the role of Richard Gutjahr and his high-level Israeli intelligence officer wife. He also mentions the meeting of Israeli Chief of Staff, Uhaul Eisen Mofaz, with prominent neoconservatives in the Pentagon. Bollyn further discusses the invasion of Afghanistan and the subsequent occupation of Iraq, which he claims were part of the bigger plan to destabilize and control the Middle East. Citing General Wesley Clark’s statements, Bollyn suggests that the ultimate goal was to target seven countries, with five of them already being accomplished. Overall, Bollyn argues that the war on terror was a means to fulfill an unknown plan driven by Zionism and Israeli interests.

    Christopher Bollyn goes on to discuss the Israeli plan to fragment Arab states in the Middle East, which was articulated in a paper published in 1982. This plan involves breaking up the states along ethnic and confessional lines, similar to what happened in Yugoslavia in the 1990s. Bollyn explains that Iraq, Syria, Libya, and Sudan have already been fragmented, and the ultimate goal is to establish Jewish military and economic hegemony over the entire Middle East. He highlights the complicity of the American government in this plan, citing a 1948 document written by the US Joint Chiefs of Staff that acknowledged Zionist objectives. Bollyn also mentions an email written by Hillary Clinton in 2012, where she states that using American force in Syria would help Israel. This, along with statements made by current Secretary of State John Kerry, suggests that the United States is actively involved in fragmenting and destroying countries like Syria for the benefit of Israel, and not out of any American interest.

    Christopher Bollyn then discusses the involvement of the US government in funding terrorist militias in Syria, which has fueled the ongoing war. He highlights the fact that many members of these militias wear ski masks to hide their faces, as they are paid mercenaries who have a future career to protect. Bollyn also points out a concerning incident involving Senator John McCain, who illegally entered Syria and met with leaders of a militia that the US was funding. He identifies one of the men McCain met with as Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, who later became the head of ISIS. Bollyn questions why McCain’s office provided an inadequate response when asked about the identity of the man in the black shirt seen in the photograph. Bollyn also sheds light on the questionable nature of the US war on terror, noting that terrorism has actually increased since 9/11 and is ten times greater in the countries where the US is fighting. He suggests that either the war on terror is counterproductive or there is another hidden agenda at play. Bollyn concludes by implicating Benjamin Netanyahu, the current Prime Minister of Israel, in the design and construction of the 9/11 attacks, along with other Jewish neocons in the Bush Administration, linking the evidential trail back to the Israeli government.

    Christopher Bollyn also discusses the connection between Ehud Barak and Benjamin Netanyahu, and how Barak made a public statement on the BBC World before the Twin Towers fell, blaming Osama bin Laden for the attack and calling for a war on terror. Bollyn points out that Barak was Netanyahu’s commander in an Israeli covert Commando force. He also highlights the false narrative presented by the New York Times after the attack, stating that hijacked jets destroyed the Twin Towers and hit the Pentagon, when in fact, there is evidence to suggest that drones were used and no large Boeing jet hit the Pentagon. Bollyn also mentions the ruthless actions of the Israeli state in the past, such as the attack on a US intelligence ship in 1967. He concludes by comparing the cover-up of 9/11 to the conspiracy surrounding the assassination of JFK and the immense cost of the fraudulent war on terror.

    Bollyn explains that the War on Terror is essentially an Israeli strategy, promoted by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu since 1979, to involve the US military and its allies in the Middle East to fight on behalf of Israel. Bollyn points out that Netanyahu wrote books on the topic, claiming that Islamic terrorists were attacking Israel because it was part of the West and therefore the West needed to fight this war. He argues that this is a deceptive way to delegitimize the Palestinian resistance to Israeli occupation. Bollyn also highlights Netanyahu’s statement after the 9/11 attacks, where he said that it would generate sympathy and be beneficial for Israel. Additionally, Bollyn discusses the close relationship between Netanyahu and Larry Silverstein, who owned the three buildings that collapsed on 9/11, and how Silverstein acquired the World Trade Center towers through a privatization scheme.

    The speaker also connects the war on terror to the Israeli stratagem and historical figures like Menachem Begin and David Ben-Gurion, who had aspirations for a larger Israel. He emphasizes the extreme nature of the current Israeli government and how acts of terrorism are used to scare people into supporting their aggressive Middle East war policy. The speaker concludes by mentioning the invasion of South Lebanon by Israel and their intention to establish a Christian state there.

    The speaker then discusses the actions of a radical Zionist group known as the Shamir group in the late 1940s, including the assassination of a United Nations mediator in Palestine. The group also played a role in the expulsion of Palestinians during the Israeli takeover after the United Nations partitioned Palestine. The speaker connects this history to the current mayor of Chicago, Rahm Emanuel, suggesting he has ties to the “Mohsad” (Mossad) and has been influential in American politics.

    The speaker then shifts to discuss the Israeli aviation of 9/11, highlighting a movie made in 1978 featuring a plane crashing into the Pan Am building and another movie made in 2000 featuring a plane crashing into the World Trade Center. These films, produced by Israeli agent Arnon Milchan, are presented as examples of predictive programming. The speaker also mentions Milchan’s involvement in a secret Israeli organization called Lakam, which was involved in smuggling nuclear components from America to Israel. Additionally, Benjamin Netanyahu’s role in the war on terror and the Netanyahu Institute on International Terrorism are discussed, along with a 1980 prediction made by the head of Mossad about terrorism coming to America, specifically New York City.

    Milchan and another agent, Avraham Shalom Bendor, tried to secure the security contract for the World Trade Center in 1987, but it was torn up when it was discovered that Bendor was a convicted murderer in Israel. However, they later went to work for Jules Kroll, a business partner of Maurice Greenberg, and their company, Kroll Associates, got the security contract for the World Trade Center after the 1993 bombing. It is also mentioned that the Israelis had prior knowledge of the 1983 bombing of the Beirut barracks but failed to share that information with the Americans. The section ends by discussing how the US, Saudi Arabia, Israel, and Pakistan cooperated to arm and train the mujahideen in Afghanistan, even supporting anti-western groups, in order to create a future enemy for the War on Terror.

    Christopher Bollyn then discusses the influence of a man named V Rafia, who used Charlie Wilson’s office as his own and had significant control over lobbying efforts. Bollyn goes on to explain how Arab fighters, known as Afghan Arabs, were trained by Israeli military intelligence, including Osama bin Laden. He mentions a man named Ali Muhammad, who trained bin Laden and set up a terrorist cell in Nairobi. Bollyn then connects the creation of Al-Qaeda and Taliban to the US, Saudi Arabia, and Israel in the early 1980s. He also mentions an article from Foreign Affairs magazine in 1998 that discussed the possibility of catastrophic terrorism coming to America. Bollyn points out that the authors of this report, including Philip Zelikow, went on to play prominent roles in the 9/11 Commission. He also highlights the Project for the New American Century, a group that predicted the need for US military engagement prior to 9/11.

    The speaker also discusses how terrorism has been used as a pretext for launching wars and justifying foreign policies. He mentions the 9/11 attacks as the catalyst for implementing long-standing plans and projects. The speaker also highlights the close relationship between Israeli intelligence and ISIS, claiming that the Israeli intelligence outfit, SITE, had access to ISIS beheading videos before they were released. Furthermore, he argues that there is a connection between the Clinton and Bush families through their involvement in the Iran-Contra scandal. The speaker suggests that politicians with a secret Vice or criminal history are often willing to do what they’re told to keep their secrets hidden. He concludes by discussing the fraudulent nature of some ISIS videos and how events like the Orlando shooting are used to draw Israel and the West closer together.

    He argues that the American public was duped into supporting the global war on terror through a combination of controlling the investigation, media interpretation, and litigation. The evidence was destroyed, and there was no criminal investigation into the attacks. The speaker also questions the integrity of key figures involved in the 9/11 Commission and their true motivations. He highlights several individuals who played a role in the cover-up, ultimately raising doubts about the official narrative of the events.

    He highlights the influence of figures like Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and media mogul Rupert Murdoch, who played a significant role in shaping public opinion through media ownership. The speaker also points out the involvement of powerful figures like Jacob Rothschild and Cheney Woolsey in the control of resources in places like Kurdistan and the Golan Heights. The speaker raises concerns about media consolidation and the lack of transparency surrounding events like the collapse of Building 7. Additionally, the speaker reveals a potential conflict of interest involving Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein, who oversaw the 9/11 tort litigation, suggesting that the legal proceedings were strategically settled out of court. Overall, the speaker suggests a dual-deception, where the narrative of 9/11 and the War on Terror is carefully controlled to serve specific interests.

    The speaker then discusses the involvement of the Mossad company Envy in airport security in Europe and their connection to the 9/11 attacks. The company ICTS, which was responsible for security at Boston, Newark, and Dulles airports on that day, was a defendant in the 9/11 Court litigation. However, the trial ended abruptly with the judge dismissing them as just the parent company. The speaker also mentions individuals involved in the litigation, such as Kenneth Feinberg and Sheila Birnbaum, both high-level Zionist players. They were responsible for distributing money to the families of 9/11 victims, and those who accepted the money had to sign non-disclosure agreements. The speaker highlights the connection between these individuals and their ties to Israel. The judge overseeing the litigation, Michael McCasey, is also mentioned, as he belonged to the same congregation as John Schallerstein, oversaw the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, and facilitated Larry Silverstein’s negotiations with the insurance company. The speaker suggests that the government and media are suppressing evidence that contradicts the official narrative of 9/11 in order to protect the true culprits. The speaker personally realized early on that the government’s story was a lie and began writing about it, eventually relocating to Europe. He shares conversations he had with former German intelligence chiefs who questioned the official narrative and pointed to Mossad as a possible culprit. However, their statements were not published in German magazines due to strict restrictions on discussing such matters in Germany.

    Christopher Bollyn also discusses the issue of deception and disinformation in the mainstream media. He explains that journalists often do not question the official version of events and those who do are labeled as crazy or fired from their jobs. Bollyn also highlights some anomalies of 9/11, such as the strange behavior of the hijackers and the peculiar characteristics of the planes that hit the Twin Towers. He suggests that there may have been a missile-like object fired before the plane hit the tower, possibly made of depleted uranium. Bollyn provides evidence of a burning object leaving a trail of dark oxides, which he believes could be a result of depleted uranium.

    When discussing the characteristics of the burning World Trade Center towers on 9/11, he suggests that an object, possibly a burning warhead, was used to create a superheated environment inside the towers, causing anything combustible to immediately burst into flames. Bollyn points out that there were peculiar explosions coming out of the entry wounds where the planes entered the buildings, which he believes could be indicative of thermite. He mentions that thermite produces white smoke and incredible heat when it burns. Bollyn also highlights the presence of molten iron and molybdenum in the dust from the World Trade Center, which cannot be explained by burning jet fuel or office fires, but can be attributed to thermite. He concludes that the government reports have ignored this evidence, suggesting a cover-up.

    Christopher Bollyn suggests a controlled demolition was responsible for the collapse of the World Trade Center on 9/11. He mentions the discovery of super thermite material in the dust, which is capable of releasing more energy per gram than any known explosive. The smoke from the burning pile contained nanoparticles that were extremely dangerous when inhaled, causing serious illnesses such as cancer and Parkinson’s disease. Additionally, molten steel was found beneath the rubble, even weeks after the attack. Bollyn also highlights the suspicious destruction of Building 6, where all the evidence for major crimes in the 1990s was stored. The night before the attack, the evidence was stolen from the vault in the basement and then the vault was bombed to cover up the theft. Bollyn raises questions about the Pentagon attack as well, pointing out the lack of visible evidence of a plane crash.

    Christopher Bollyn then discusses the inconsistencies and cover-ups surrounding the 9/11 Pentagon attack and the Shanksville crash. He questions how a small aluminum body plane could have penetrated the reinforced concrete wall of the Pentagon without damaging the columns in between. Bollyn also highlights the lack of evidence of a plane at the Shanksville site, with the debris field located elsewhere. He emphasizes the need to inform, organize, and take meaningful action to resist the fraudulent War on Terror, urging people to boycott Israeli products and engage in political activism. Bollyn quotes JFK to emphasize the importance of seeking genuine peace and building a better future for all.

    At the Q & A, the speaker is asked a personal question about Noam Chomsky and his stance on 9/11. The speaker believes that Chomsky has been an agent of manipulation and control, as his position on 9/11 contradicts the rest of his work. The speaker also mentions Alex Jones, another alternative voice in the media who avoids discussing Israeli involvement in 9/11. In response to the second question about video footage showing a plane wing entering a building, the speaker acknowledges that the video may be fraudulent, but maintains that planes did indeed strike the World Trade Center based on eyewitness accounts and the sound of the impact.

    Christopher Bollyn also reveals that many powerful figures in America, including the Bush family, have significant investments in war stocks. Companies like Halliburton, General Dynamics, and Northrop Grumman profited greatly from the war. Bollyn believes that while individuals like George Bush and Dick Cheney should be held accountable for treason and war crimes, it is important to recognize that the issue goes beyond them. He calls for a proper investigation that includes figures like Cheney, Bush, Sheratoff Ashcroft, and Ali Hupa to expose the full extent of their knowledge and involvement. Bollyn also addresses the Saudi connection, stating that while there is evidence of financial support from a Saudi royal family member, there is no proof of their involvement in the actual crime. He suggests that the Saudis have been manipulated to play the role of financiers, with the United States and Israel dictating their actions. Overall, Bollyn argues that the American government has become a “crimeocracy” run by criminals, and simply replacing one person with another will not bring about real change.

    The speaker also discusses the theory that the images and videos from 9/11 were pre-fabricated and that the witnesses were actors, suggesting that no real footage of the event exists. However, the speaker believes that these theories are “red herrings” and that the focus should be on the fact that thousands of people were killed and the world has changed as a result. The speaker argues that the US and Europe are now engaged in an open-ended war in the Middle East, with plans for more wars with Iran and Russia. They believe that this war agenda is orchestrated by Zionists. The solution proposed is to change the banking system and establish national banks that issue credit to the people on behalf of the state, in order to free nations from debt slavery. However, the speaker acknowledges that this would require a large popular movement to overthrow the current banking system.

    Christopher Bollyn then discusses the systemic corruption in the banking and financial system. He mentions that while there may be some smaller banks that are not in conspiracy with everyone, the overall system is rigged against the people. He also highlights the corruption within the U.S. government, where the president can declare war without Congress and the Federal Reserve controls the printing of money. Bollyn emphasizes the need to reorganize and rectify these situations in order to find solutions. He also touches upon the connection between the Arab Spring and the fraudulent war on terror, stating that the United States manipulated the Arab Spring to serve its own interests, as seen in Egypt and Syria. Bollyn expresses his frustration that these issues are not being discussed enough in America and that the media, controlled by a few corporations, keeps the public ignorant. He concludes by saying that the American people are starting to wake up but that there is still a long way to go.

    At the end, the speaker expresses their disappointment in the current state of the country and the political circus surrounding the Trump-Clinton rivalry. They argue that Americans need to wake up and take responsibility for their own future, instead of relying on one candidate to solve all their problems. The speaker emphasizes the importance of being informed and spreading awareness, as they believe that a revolution of awareness is necessary for real change. They mention various conspiracy theories, such as chemtrails, Fukushima, and 9/11, stating that these events were hoaxes designed to deceive and control the population. In conclusion, the speaker urges the audience to fight against the deception and lies that have enslaved them.

    YouTube Video

  • Alarming Trends That May Have a Significant Impact on the Future of the USA

    Alarming Trends That May Have a Significant Impact on the Future of the USA

    The video discusses various alarming trends and potential consequences that may have a significant impact on the future of the USA. It touches upon economic warning signs, such as financial struggles and national debt, as well as the shifting priorities and habits of individuals and big businesses’ response to these changes.

    The video also emphasizes the role of natural resources, particularly oil and natural gas, in global conflicts and the potential game-changer of significant resources in Gaza. It further delves into the issues of job cuts, labor strikes, the rise of automation, and the challenges in navigating a changing job market.

    The video raises concerns about diminishing savings, rising cost of living, and the lack of financial safety nets, as well as the potential consequences of labor strikes and the increasing trend towards automation.

    Lastly, it discusses suspicions of internal orchestration behind corporate cyber attacks, questioning corporate ethics and transparency. Overall, the video serves as a warning to be aware of these developments and emphasizes the need for accountability and preparedness.

    Alarming Trends

    The video emphasizes the urgency and importance of a message they have, claiming that it involves the future of the country, our freedoms, and our way of life. They mention having come across information that took them months to understand and verify, which reveals developments unfolding under our noses that will change the nation.

    The speaker urges viewers to be ready to listen with an open mind and prepare to take action. They then discuss economic warning signs, highlighting concerning Google Trends related to financial struggles and national debt. This trend suggests that people are feeling the financial pinch, with wages not keeping up with inflation.

    The speaker questions what will hold up the economy if people can’t spend, emphasizing the need to pay attention to these signs. They also discuss Home Depot, explaining how the company has successfully adapted to consumers’ changing needs during tough economic times by focusing on smaller home projects. This demonstrates Home Depot’s ability to thrive by aligning its business strategy with current trends.

    The narrator then discusses the shifting priorities and habits of individuals, focusing on the practical rather than the luxurious, particularly in the context of Home Depot’s success. The narrator reflects on how big businesses respond to these shifts and what it says about society as a whole. The conversation then shifts to the topic of natural resources and their role in global conflicts, specifically focusing on the Middle East and the significance of oil and natural gas.

    The discovery of significant resources in Gaza is highlighted as a potential game-changer, with implications for global politics, economies, and security. It emphasizes how events halfway across the world can have a direct impact on the US and the stability of entire regions. Finally, the discussion explores the domino effect of job cuts, labor strikes, and the relentless march towards automation, addressing the economic strain from recent global events and the increased investment in robotics and AI.

    The video then discusses two major issues: the diminishing traditional labor and the rising cost of living. Labor strikes are on the rise as workers demand fair wages to keep up with the skyrocketing cost of living. However, as companies face pressure to increase wages, they are more inclined to accelerate automation, leading to potential job losses. Government policies, such as tax incentives for automation, further incentivize companies to invest in technology rather than people. This creates a complex situation where finding a balance between innovation and employment becomes crucial.

    The video also raises concerns about cyber security attacks on major corporations, suggesting that there may be hidden motives behind these attacks that benefit select individuals within the corporations. Additionally, the video highlights the significant increase in the cost of living, such as insurance premiums and grocery prices, which is putting a strain on people’s budgets. Overall, these issues present a challenge in navigating a changing job market and sustaining a comfortable lifestyle.

    The video goes on to discuss the alarming trend of dwindling savings among Americans. Rising inflation and stagnant incomes have led to higher costs of living, forcing people to dip into their savings just to meet everyday expenses. The data shows a consistent monthly drop in savings, raising concerns about the lack of financial safety nets for families. This situation not only affects the ability to save for the future but also creates stress and financial insecurity.

    Additionally, the video highlights the increasing number of labor strikes as a response to these economic pressures. Workers from various sectors are demanding fair wages and better working conditions, as they struggle to keep up with the rising cost of living. The strikes are a fight for dignity and survival, showcasing the disparity between average workers and corporate giants. The video also mentions how a portion of the stimulus money intended to help individuals during the pandemic ended up benefiting corporations and banks, further contributing to inflated costs of living. Overall, both the decline in savings and the rise in labor strikes reflect the challenges Americans are facing in adapting to the new economic reality of increasing costs.

    As companies invest more in robotics and AI, the demand for human labor is expected to decrease, potentially rendering many traditional jobs obsolete. This shift is not just about cutting costs but also a strategic response to the changing economic landscape. The video raises concerns about the displaced workers and questions whether retraining and shifting to new sectors will be enough to cope with the scale of change. The push for a guaranteed income is also discussed, highlighting the potential impact on society and the psychological effects of not having work. It emphasizes the need to consider the long-term implications of the automation revolution and how our roles in the workforce will change.

    The speaker also raises concerns about the possibility of corporate cyber attacks being orchestrated internally as part of a new strategy. They highlight the suspicious timing of CEOs cashing out before an attack, as well as companies with shaky finances suddenly being targeted. The speaker also suggests that these attacks can impact stock prices, potentially allowing insiders to profit from well-timed sales or purchases. The implications of such actions extend beyond cybersecurity, touching on corporate ethics, transparency, and the trust placed in these companies by consumers, investors, and citizens. The speaker emphasizes the need for awareness, tough questions, and accountability in order to address these possibilities and address the deeper issues within the corporate world.

    YouTube Video

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0qq9phLCzxc

  • Israel Lied That al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza Was Being Used as Hamas Headquarters

    Israel Lied That al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza Was Being Used as Hamas Headquarters

    This video exposes Israel’s deceptive claim that al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza was being used as a headquarters for Hamas, justifying an attack on the hospital. The evidence presented by Israel was weak, yet it was supported by the US administration and propagandists, resulting in the hospital being repeatedly attacked and left without power. The speaker condemns these actions as war crimes and calls for accountability. They express disappointment at the lack of outrage for Palestinian lives and urge viewers to take action.

    Detailed Description

    In the video, Owen Jones highlights the Israeli Defense Forces’ (IDF) false claim that al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza was the main headquarters for Hamas freedom fighting activities, which was used to justify a devastating attack on the hospital. The IDF released a mocked-up video showcasing tunnels and meeting rooms allegedly belonging to Hamas within the hospital. However, foreign doctors, including Norwegian physician Mads Gilbert, vehemently denied these claims.

    Despite the lack of evidence, the US administration under President Joe Biden supported Israel’s narrative, lthough they called it a “node“, not the headquarters. As a result, the hospital was repeatedly attacked and left without power, leading to the deaths of doctors, nurses, patients, and premature babies.

    The IDF’s evidence, consisting of amateur footage and a dilapidated bathroom, failed to convince anyone of the hospital’s alleged role. Israel also refused demands for an independent investigation of the tunnels and ultimately destroyed them, preventing further scrutiny. This deception and subsequent war crimes committed by Israeli terrorists expose their disregard for civilian lives and international law.

    The Washington Post conducted an investigation and concluded that the evidence fell short of showing that Hamas had been using the hospital as a command and control center. The investigation did not find any immediate evidence of military use by Hamas in the hospital buildings or any connection to the tunnel network.

    Owen Jones emphasizes that targeting a hospital full of sick and dying patients was a grave war crime, and criticizes those who justified the assault on the hospital. He also mentions a column in the Washington Post that supported Israel’s claims, and criticizes commentators who moved the goalposts to justify the attack.

    The speaker asserts that these actions are war crimes, and calls for holding those who disseminated lies and propaganda accountable. He also expresses shock and disappointment at the lack of outrage towards Palestinian lives and the acceptance of depraved war crimes, stating that he will never view the world the same way again. He emphasizes the need to learn from this lesson and take action.

  • History of Water Fluoridation and Its Harmful Effects

    History of Water Fluoridation and Its Harmful Effects

    This video delves into the history of water fluoridation and its connection to stained teeth.

    In the early 1900s, Dr. Lawrence McKay noticed brown stains on the teeth of Colorado Springs residents, which were permanent and severe. He conducted research and found that the stains were prevalent in children waiting for their permanent teeth. McKay theorized that something in the water supply was causing the staining.

    In 1923, McKay encountered similar reports in Oakley, Idaho, where the construction of a communal water pipeline resulted in stained teeth. McKay advised using a different water source, and the children’s teeth eventually became healthy again. McKay’s findings led him and Dr. Grover Kempf to investigate reports of stained teeth in Bauxite, Arkansas, where the town supported the Aluminum Company of America. These early discoveries set the stage for further exploration into water fluoridation.

    Doctors McKay and Kempf investigated the disordered teeth of children in Bauxite, but found nothing peculiar in the water supply. However, H.V. Churchill, the chief chemist of an aluminum company, decided to test the water using a more sophisticated method and found high levels of fluoride. This discovery led to the conclusion that high levels of fluoride in water caused tooth discoloration, known as fluorosis.

    While fluoride was known to be toxic, studies conducted by dentist H. Trendley Dean found that towns with higher natural fluoride levels had fewer cavities. However, the general consensus at the time was that fluoride was a poison.

    In 1939, Gerald J. Cox, a researcher paid by an aluminum company, proposed mandatory water fluoridation. Extensive studies confirmed the inverse relationship between fluoride in water and tooth decay, but also revealed increased rates of dental fluorosis. The determination of fluoride levels was later proved wrong, as CDC analysis found that 40% of teens had some degree of dental fluorosis.

    Dr. Weston A. Price observed that societies on traditional diets had fewer cavities compared to those on industrialized diets. The narrator mentions the rise in tooth brushing habits during and after World War II and highlights the pro-fluoridation stance adopted by the Public Health Service, which was under the jurisdiction of billionaire Andrew J. Mellon, the founder of the Aluminum Corporation of America.

    The first purposely fluoridated water supply was implemented in Grand Rapids, Michigan, and after 15 years of study, a significant decline in dental cavities was observed. The transcript reveals the appointment of Oscar R. Ewing, who had a conflict of interest as he previously served as legal counsel for the Aluminum Corporation of America, and his collaboration with Edward Bernays, a pioneer in public relations. The passage concludes by mentioning the Newburgh and Kingston experiment, which showed a decrease in cavities in Newburgh but also higher rates of cancer and heart disease.

    Cities in the US started fluoridating their water supply in the 1950s, with the government aiming for universal fluoridation. However, cases like the devastation of a Mohawk Indian reservation due to industrial pollution, mainly fluoride, brought attention to the harmful effects of fluoride.

    In 1975, biochemists presented evidence of an increase in cancer rates in cities with fluoridated water, leading to a congressional hearing and subsequent animal studies that confirmed the link between fluoride and bone cancer. Despite these findings, a commission formed by the government disputed the evidence and recommended caution, but their recommendations were ignored. Epidemiological reports also showed a relationship between fluoride consumption and bone fractures, further raising concerns. Despite opposition, government officials continued to support universal water fluoridation without sufficient evidence of its safety.

    The narrator mentions studies that have shown potential negative health effects, such as increased risk of hip fracture in the elderly and higher rates of dental decay in fluoridated areas. It also exposes the historical connection between fluoride and the aluminum and phosphate fertilizer industries, revealing that the fluoride in today’s water supply is a waste product. The transcript questions the lack of control over dosage in water fluoridation and argues that topical application of fluoride through toothpaste is sufficient for dental health. Overall, it raises doubts about the safety and effectiveness of water fluoridation.

    The video then highlights how phosphate fertilizer companies turned hazardous gasses into a liquid known as hexafluorosilicic acid, which cannot be dumped into waterways but can be sold as a product. Public water suppliers buy this hazardous waste product from the fertilizer companies and dump it into drinking water without consent. Hexafluorosilicic acid contains trace amounts of lead, arsenic, mercury, and radioactive isotopes, which are harmful to human health even in minute quantities.

    The video also suggests that fluoride may impact cognitive abilities and inhibit spirituality by calcifying and disrupting the pineal gland. It encourages viewers to take steps to prevent industrial waste from entering their bodies through options like buying glass-bottled spring water or using filtration systems that remove fluoride. Additionally, it emphasizes the importance of local activism to address water fluoridation and promises to discuss the various health problems fluoride can cause in the next video.

  • Aleksandr Dugin Discusses Geopolitics, Religion and Conflicts in the Middle East

    Aleksandr Dugin Discusses Geopolitics, Religion and Conflicts in the Middle East

    In this video, Aleksandr Dugin, mentor of Vladimir Putin, discusses the Palestine-Israel conflict within the framework of the shift from a unipolar to a multipolar global order. He argues that Israel serves as a proxy for Western hegemony and that understanding geopolitical power dynamics is crucial for understanding their actions and motivations. Dugin emphasizes the need for unity among Islamic countries to resist Western control and establish their sovereignty. He also criticizes the West’s imposition of its values and rules on other civilizations and highlights the biases and double standards in Western media’s coverage of conflicts.

    Dugin emphasizes the need for a belief system that promotes harmony and respect, criticizing the reputation of Israel and the United States’ support for it. Dugin predicts opposition against the West from the Muslim world and highlights the significance of the conflict surrounding the construction of the Third Temple in Jerusalem. He also discusses the potential for a nuclear conflict in the Middle East and the need for an ontological explanation to comprehend the ongoing crisis. Dugin concludes by urging for unity against a common enemy and expressing his hope for a free Palestine.

    Detailed Description

    Professor Alexander Dugin begins by discussing the Palestine-Israel conflict within the context of the transition from a unipolar to a multipolar world system. He highlights that Israel is a proxy for the hegemonic power of the West, which plays a significant role in the conflict. Dugin suggests that understanding the geopolitical balance of power is essential in comprehending the actions and motives of the Israelis.

    Prof. Dugin then discusses the current global order and the potential shift towards multipolarity. He explains how the hegemonic power is resistant to allowing this new order to emerge, leading to conflicts, wars, and diplomatic confrontations. Dugin argues that understanding Israeli politics requires considering the psychology of the Israeli state, which is based on a radical vision of the chosen race and religion. He suggests that Israel sees itself as the main people on Earth and views any resistance as a radical humiliation. Dugin predicts that Israel’s response to Hamas attacks will be harsh, with the goal of full extermination and ethnic cleansing of Gaza. He emphasizes that Israel is being supported by the global hegemon in this endeavor.

    Mr. Dugin goes on to discuss the situation in Gaza and the lack of a solid and clear Russian stance on it. He argues that while Russia has expressed its support for the Palestinian people and their struggle against Israel, it ultimately sees the issue as primarily a problem between Arabs or Muslims and Israel, with the support of the United States. Dugin suggests that if the Islamic world does not react forcefully against Israel and instead tries to find a solution through diplomatic channels, Russia cannot intervene directly. He also notes that during Russia’s conflict in Ukraine, few Islamic states came to their aid, highlighting the need for Islamic countries to overcome their internal conflicts and consolidate their power as a pole within the global system.

    Aleksandr Dugin argues that the conflict between Hamas and Israel is not just a local problem, but a direct attack on the sovereignty of Islamic civilization. He believes that if Islamic civilization does not react and stand up for itself, it shows that it is not ready to exist as a sovereign and independent power. While Russia is politically on the side of the Palestinian people, Dugin emphasizes that it is not realistic to expect Russia to open a new front and fight for the Palestinians against American power. He questions the absence of support from Islamic states, armies, and people in the face of what he perceives as the extermination of the Palestinian people. Dugin believes that the treatment of the Islamic world by the West, particularly in regards to the Palestinian issue, is a humiliation and existential threat that must be responded to in order to uphold Islamic identity and rights.

    Aleksandr Dugin then discusses the concept of sovereignty and how it can be tested through the response to existential threats. He argues that many countries may claim to be sovereign but are not if they do not respond to geopolitical challenges. Russia, he says, is fighting to restore its sovereignty in the Eurasian context. He also suggests that if the Islamic world accepts and responds to the challenges it faces, it could become a new sovereign pole alongside Russia and China. However, Dugin acknowledges that there are divisions among Arab nations and within Islamic countries themselves, with the elites being influenced by globalist networks while the people have different perspectives. He believes that if Islamic leaders listen to and align with their own people, unity can be achieved.

    Aleksandr Dugin explains that the resistance against Israel by Lebanese, Syrian, and Palestinian groups is becoming a global Islamic phenomenon that will eventually become an independent geopolitical power. Dugin believes that Muslims are gaining a geopolitical consciousness and understanding the need for unity in order to resist colonization and regain their status as subjects in geopolitics. He mentions the importance of a common platform and denominator for their self-organization and emphasizes that Gaza and Palestine are crucial test lines for their sovereignty.

    When Prof. Dugin touches on the concept of sovereignty and how it has evolved in the post-Cold War era, he explains that in the bipolar system of the Cold War, only the capitalist West and the socialist East were considered sovereign, while the rest of the world had to choose a side or submit to the rule of one of these powers. However, after the fall of the Soviet Union, there was only one pole of sovereignty, the liberal West, and all other states were expected to abandon their claims to sovereignty. Dugin argues that with the growing independence of Russia and the rise of China, there are now other contenders for sovereign power, but neither country alone can compete with the West. Therefore, he suggests a redistribution of sovereignty on a multipolar basis, where Russia and China can combine their capacities to challenge the dominance of the collective West.

    Speaking to the issue of sovereignty in the Islamic world, Aleksandr Dugin states that it is crucial for Islamic countries to unite and establish their sovereignty in order to resist Western control. He emphasizes that countries like Israel are not truly sovereign as they rely heavily on the West for support, while countries like Russia and China strive to affirm their sovereignty. Dugin argues that the world can either be unipolar or multipolar, and it is important to choose the latter, which is based on the collaboration and commonalities of different civilizations. He believes that a multipolar world order can only be established through the unity and cooperation of civilizations like Russia, China, the Islamic world, India, Africa, Latin America, and others.

    When discussing the concept of universal values and how the West has failed to uphold them, Aleksandr Dugin argues that the West, with its emphasis on individualism, liberal democracy, and market economy, has imposed its principles on the rest of humanity. However, new civilizations are emerging based on different principles. For example, in Russia, traditional values, family, patriotism, and empire form the basis of their civilization. Dugin explains that in Russian society, being human is not about individualism but about being part of the whole, with ties to religion, ethnicity, and tradition. Similar principles form the basis of civilizations like China and Islamic tradition. Dugin asserts that without a belief in God, there are no rules, and this nationalistic attitude common in the West is rejected by other civilizations.

    Aleksandr Dugin mentions that while India relies on the West to solve its regional problems, it maintains good relations with Russia. Dugin criticizes the West’s attitude towards the “other,” stating that they either view them as the same or as a dangerous threat. He argues that this racist mindset is ingrained in the West’s ideology and geopolitics. Dugin points out that resistance against global liberal values and unipolarity is growing not only in other countries but also within the West itself, with many people protesting against the treatment of others, such as the Palestinian genocide. He concludes that modern-day racism is still prevalent, despite the abandonment of the term, and cites Israel and the West as examples of this.

    Aleksandr Dugin criticizes the Israeli government for targeting Palestinian civilians and ignoring their sovereignty, despite international decisions and the obsolete structure of the United Nations. Dugin argues that international law is not real and is simply a tool of Western hegemony. He mentions the double standards in indictments, pointing out that while Vladimir Putin has faced allegations of war crimes in Ukraine without evidence, Benjamin Netanyahu has not faced any consequences for his actions. Dugin highlights the hypocrisy and indifference of the West towards civilian casualties in Palestine, as compared to the attention given to the conflict in Ukraine.

    Aleksandr Dugin argues that those who deeply believe in the Western system and its values tend to accept everything the media says, even if it includes lies. Conversely, societies that reject the Western agenda are more inclined to believe alternative narratives that expose the hypocrisy of Western media. Dugin suggests that we are in the midst of a deep psychological, cultural, and mental war, where the transmission of facts is heavily censored and controlled. He also highlights the disproportionate coverage of civilian casualties in conflicts like Ukraine and Gaza, implying that the globalist agenda is indifferent to the suffering and continues to perpetuate genocide.

    Aleksandr Dugin further discusses the need for a deeper belief system that promotes harmony, respect, and love for tradition and diversity of cultures. He argues that those who perpetrate crimes and fuel conflicts will eventually be defeated. Dugin also suggests that the reputation of Israel is irreparable, and the United States’ support for Israel creates problems with the Arab and Islamic world, damaging their relations. He believes that the US’s current actions lack real geopolitical reasons and are a hegemonic gesture. Dugin predicts that the West will be opposed by the Muslim world, and the US will lose without any balance or positive relations.

    Aleksandr Dugin believes that while the West will continue to supply Ukraine with weapons, the situation is worse for the global West overall. Dugin emphasizes that multipolarity does not promote anti-Semitism or racism, but rather accepts and celebrates differences. He also suggests that the current events in the Middle East, particularly with the conflict between Arabs and Jews, is causing deep trauma for the Islamic soul and will lead to a long-lasting and significant impact. Dugin speculates that Germany may be a victim of its own strategy, as the situation has undermined their position and created new security threats for the entire West. He also brings up the religious dimension of the conflict, highlighting the eschatological elements and the significance of defending Temple Mountain as potential triggers for a large-scale Palestinian revolt in the West Bank and Eastern Jerusalem.

    Prof. Dugin explains the significance of the conflict surrounding the construction of the Third Temple in Jerusalem, emphasizing that it is not solely an economic or political matter. He discusses how different religious groups, including Jews, Christians, and Muslims, hold religious beliefs regarding this temple and its connection to the end times. Dugin argues that these eschatological beliefs can intensify the conflict and make it more radical. He also dismisses the notion that the situation is about gas discovery in Gaza, stating that the economy is a flexible element that can adapt to various circumstances. Instead, he asserts that geopolitics and ideological factors play a much more crucial role. Lastly, Dugin briefly touches on the risk of nuclear weapons and suggests that a potential World War III has already begun in some form between the unipolar camp and its opponents.

    When discussing the potential for a nuclear conflict in the Middle East, Aleksandr Dugin mentions that Israel, Iran, and Pakistan are known or suspected to possess nuclear weapons. Dugin suggests that if the conflict escalates further, there is a possibility that tactical nuclear weapons could be used, potentially leading to a nuclear exchange between these countries. He also highlights the involvement of the United States and Russia in potentially supporting their respective allies. Dugin emphasizes the devastating consequences of using strategic nuclear weapons, which would result in the end of humanity, but states that the use of tactical nuclear weapons could still allow for the continuation of humanity, albeit with significant destruction and loss of life.

    Aleksandr Dugin then discusses the significance of the Middle East in relation to the concept of Armageddon. He believes that the current conflict in Gaza holds religious importance, as it aligns with the prophecies of monotheistic religions. Dugin argues that geopolitics is an important tool to understand these events, but it should be complemented with a religious analysis. He suggests that there may have been a crucial error in human history that has led to the current situation, which goes beyond ideology or religious differences. Dugin emphasizes the need for an ontological explanation to comprehend the ongoing crisis, as it ultimately impacts the destiny of humanity. In closing, he warns against being influenced by leaders who do not represent the will, thoughts, and values of the people, as this can lead to real authoritarianism and totalitarianism.

    Ultimately, Aleksandr Dugin emphasizes the importance of standing together against a common enemy, as they do in Russia. He urges Islamic brothers to understand the struggle and fight for their own values, as they are in a similar position as Russia was in the Ukrainian conflict. Dugin believes that only by being united can they preserve their dignity and achieve victory. He also expresses his hope for a free Palestine.

    YouTube Video

  • Documentary About How Jeffrey Epstein Struck Questionable Plea Deal with Alex Acosta

    Documentary About How Jeffrey Epstein Struck Questionable Plea Deal with Alex Acosta

    The YouTube video “How Jeffrey Epstein Got Away With It” explores the story behind Jeffrey Epstein’s examination, trial, and conviction for federal sex trafficking involving minors. The video highlights the questionable plea deal struck with Epstein by Alex Acosta, the Chief Federal Prosecutor for Southern Florida, and the implications it had on the justice system. The documentary also examines the case from the perspective of intelligence agencies, particularly the CIA and Israel’s Mossad, and their alleged involvement in it. The video raises questions about the circumstances surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s death in 2019 and suggests alternative explanations for it.

    Acosta was the Chief Federal Prosecutor for Southern Florida from 2005 to 2009, and his job was to ensure that criminals went to jail. He was portrayed as a person of integrity and an honorable guy, who caught the attention of former president Donald Trump. However, he refused to answer questions during his Senate confirmation hearing for the Secretary of Labor position, and the Senate was concerned about a particular case involving Jeffrey Epstein.

    Jeffrey Epstein was a friend of presidents and high-profile lawyers who was arrested on new sex trafficking charges and waiting trial for federal sex trafficking involving minors. Acosta gave Epstein the plea deal of the century, which excused underage sex trafficking, and allowed Epstein to walk free.

    When Acosta was being interviewed for the job of Trump’s labor secretary, he was asked about the questionable plea deal, and he said that he was ordered to stand down immediately because Epstein belonged to intelligence. The current US Attorney General cannot order a US Attorney to stand down unless he is elected by someone who is not part of the judiciary.

    According to Nick Bryan, an expert reporter on the Epstein case, only the president or the Attorney General has the power to order a US attorney to stand down. There have been four presidential administrations that have covered up the Jeffrey Epstein case, and now, the Biden Administration is covering it up. The American government is aiding the embedding of child trafficking by not investigating Jeffrey Epstein.

    The evidence potentially connects Jeffrey Epstein to the CIA and Israel’s Mossad intelligence agency. The film highlights how it was possible for one man to be protected and supported by the entire US government and how Epstein’s lawyers at Morgan and Morgan fight to give victims the best shot at compensation.

    The film also discusses how lawsuits can be expensive but that victims of abuse can receive compensation with the help of law firms. The film explains how Epstein’s case was yanked away from the Palm Beach Police Department and given to a grand jury, where a special prosecutor was responsible for showing the grand jurors the evidence necessary. However, the film argues that the grand jury was corrupt and that the special prosecutor, Barry Cromwell, called only one victim and skewed her credibility.

    The speaker then discusses the background of Jeffrey Epstein and how his victims were repeatedly molested and became addicted to drugs. The system in place allowed the perps to go unpunished once they became “unmarketable” and their damaged credibility would compromise them.

    When the grand jury didn’t indict Epstein on a single count of child abuse, the Palm Beach Police Department and its chief Michael Ryder went to the feds and claimed it was a cover-up. They didn’t prosecute him, despite having a list of 32 victims, due to pressures from high up, possibly the President or the Attorney General. The outrage over Epstein’s lenient plea deal and lack of punishment raises questions about the justice system’s dealings with high-powered individuals, prompting some to question the existence of a “VIP justice system” in the United States.

    The speaker claims that Epstein was a professional con man with access to people, money, and young girls, and that the government targeted him due to his exploitative and blackmailing behavior. The speaker also suggests that Epstein was meeting with Joe Biden’s CIA director and that he was recruited for his intelligence work due to his predilection for underage girls and his charm, deceitfulness, and sociopathic tendencies.

    The speaker further claims that Epstein’s case makes more sense when viewed from the perspective of an intelligence operation, and that the sweetheart deal he received in 2006, the prison cell cover-up, and the disappearance of his tapes are all explained by his status as an asset. Finally, the speaker points to the recent raid on Epstein’s Caribbean island and the discovery of tapes there as evidence of his intelligence work. The speaker is Stuart Kaplan, a retired FBI special agent.

    Jeffrey Epstein was later convicted as a registered offender, but despite this, he was able to maintain relationships with politicians, CEOs, and public figures, who should have had no interest in him. The speaker suggests that these actions may be due to threats or blackmail from intelligence agencies, as Robert Maxwell, Epstein’s closest confidant, was believed to have been working for Israel’s version of the CIA, Massad. The speaker also mentions the possibility that Epstein was able to blackmail powerful figures due to the intelligence apparatus behind him, making it clear that his actions were not possible without this support.

    The documentary makes claims that Robert Maxwell, an Israeli-born British media tycoon, had spilled confidential nuclear information about Israel, which led to his kidnapping and imprisonment for 18 years. After his death in 1991, Maxwell’s close relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and alleged involvement in intelligence work are speculated upon.

    Maxwell’s lawyer, Alan Dershowitz, is also discussed, highlighting his role in securing Epstein’s plea deal in 2008 and his close friendship with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The video posits that Epstein’s downfall, which took place in 2019, was a result of his growing arrogance and his use of blackmail to maintain power, ultimately outliving his usefulness.

    The opinion is then discussed regarding Jeffrey Epstein’s death in 2019 while he was awaiting trial. While it is widely believed that he committed suicide, the speaker argues that there is a larger conspiracy at play and that other co-conspirators, particularly federal agencies such as the CIA, are responsible for his death. The speaker also raises questions about Epstein’s lifestyle and funding, pointing out that he was known to have only two known clients and had a close relationship with Leslie Wexner, a wealthy CEO with ties to organized crime. The documentary however fails to consider the most likely possibility that Jeffrey Epstein is still alive and his death was faked.

    At the end, the speaker argues that Epstein was compromised himself and that his allies, including Wexner, implemented a system of secrecy and control to keep people from investing with him. The speaker also references the Epstein House of Horrors and the victims’ compensation fund as efforts to cover up his crimes. The speaker then introduces EpsteinJustice.com, an organization aimed at taking accountability for Epstein’s crimes and protecting children from similar harm.

  • Amnesty International Calls Deliberate Attacks on Journalists by Israeli Militants War Crimes

    Amnesty International Calls Deliberate Attacks on Journalists by Israeli Militants War Crimes

    On October 13, 2023, as journalists from different news outlets were covering the conflict in Alma al-Shaab on the southern border of Lebanon, the Israeli militants launched a series of deliberate shelling attacks on the journalists, killing Issam Abdallah of Reuters and seriously wounding 6 others. Among the wounded are Christina Assi of AFP (Agence France-Presse) who lost her leg in the attack. Carmen Joukhadar and Elie Brakhia reporting for Al Jazeera, Dylan Collins with AFP, Thaer Al-Sudani and Maher Nazeh with Reuters were also wounded.

    The footage from the attack was analyzed by the Amnesty Intentional and revealed that the journalists were marked as PRESS and their car had TV plastered on top of it, suggesting the attack was a violation of international law. AI called the attack by Israel a war crime and calls for an investigation to bring accountability and justice for the victims and their families.

    The video discusses the importance of journalists documenting events and collecting evidence to piece together what is happening. The affected journalists describe how seeing their friend and colleague die only strengthened their resolve to speak up for those whose voices have been silenced by Israel. They ultimately believe that this experience has made them even more committed to his field.

    So far, 63 other journalists have been killed by Israeli militants in Gaza to stop the truth from coming out.

  • Animation Backed by Bible Explaining Why Jews Are Not God’s Chosen People

    Animation Backed by Bible Explaining Why Jews Are Not God’s Chosen People

    This video references the Bible to question many commonly held beliefs about the Jewish people. The narrator argues that the Bible does not call the Jews God’s chosen people and that modern-day Israel is not their homeland. The speaker also points out that the Jewish people do not believe in the Old Testament as it is commonly understood, and that only a small percentage of the people mentioned in the Old Testament can be considered Jewish. The speaker then goes on to explain that the term “anti-Semitic” incorrectly suggests that being anti-Jewish is the same as being anti-Semitic, and that understanding the historical context is important in distinguishing between the two.

    When discussing the history of the Jews and their relationship to the name “Israel“, the speaker notes that while the Jews would have different religions and belief systems, they would all fall under the umbrella of the kingdom of Israel. The Speaker points out that Israel would be corrupted by foreign influences and would engage in materialism, sexual morality, and child sacrifice, which would lead to their downfall.

    The speaker also notes that the Jews, both before and after the fall of Israel, would launch rebellions against their oppressors, leading to their enslavement and exile. Despite the Jews’ efforts to take Palestine, the speaker argues that they have stolen the name “Israel” from the original Israelites and have convinced the Christian West to believe that they are the chosen people. The Speaker also discusses the Jewish faith and notes that the Jews believe in the Talmud alongside the Old Testament, but have a different interpretation of the Bible than Christians.

    The speaker then discusses the separation of the biblical content between the Kingdom of Israel and the Kingdom of Judah. He argues that the Jewish deception and hijacking of the Bible depend on their claim to the terms Semites, Hebrews, and Israelites, even though figures like Moses, who wrote the first five books of the Torah, were not Judahites or from the Kingdom of Judea.

    The speaker emphasizes that the majority of people in the Old Testament are not Jews, and the Bible is a history book that tells the stories of many nations and peoples, not just the Jews. The speaker concludes by stating that the Bible is not solely about Jews.

  • How Mainstream Press Would Report Israeli Crimes Against America

    How Mainstream Press Would Report Israeli Crimes Against America

    This parody video accuses Hamas of committing heinous crimes against the United States of America, which were in fact committed by Israel. This is how mainstream press would twist the stories. Replace the instances of “Hamas” with “Israel” and vice versa, and you’ll get the truth.

    Some of the worst crimes discussed include the bombing of USS Liberty in 1967, which resulted in the death of 34 American sailors and 171 injuries, and the Lavon Affair in 1954, where Hamas terrorists attempted to pin blame for an explosion on Israeli terrorists.

    Other crimes mentioned are the theft of Highly Enriched Uranium for a nuclear weapons program and the 9/11 attacks, where Hamas agents were found celebrating the destruction of the Twin Towers. The speaker also discusses a pedophilia ring run by Hamas agent Jafar al-Epstain. He concludes by urging listeners to care about Israel and sign up for the US military.

  • Deep Connection Between Childhood Experiences and Our Health by Dr. Gabor Maté

    Deep Connection Between Childhood Experiences and Our Health by Dr. Gabor Maté

    Dr. Gabor Maté discusses the deep connection between childhood experiences and our health. He argues that childhood trauma and stress can shape our personalities, behaviors, and overall well-being, often leading to addictive behaviors as coping mechanisms. Maté highlights the importance of addressing the root causes of health problems and emphasizes the need for society to support children and parents to prevent the negative effects of early stress. He also discusses the societal pressures and lack of genuine human connection in modern society, which can contribute to mental health issues and addiction. Maté encourages individuals to prioritize real-life connections and to seek therapy and treatment for underlying issues.

    He further discusses the impact of legalizing drugs on health and disease. The host argues that while it is important to treat addiction as a medical problem, criminalizing drugs has led to a failure to provide adequate care. The host also reflects on the importance of a general practitioner’s role in medicine and the need for personalized, holistic care. Dr. Gabor Maté then discusses the connection between social and relational context and human health. He argues that trauma is often overlooked in medical training and emphasizes the importance of engaging with a patient’s entire life and context to understand their illness. The host questions what makes people overcome challenges and highlights the need for more faith and openness to alternative healing practices.

    Detailed Description

    Dr. Gabor Maté explains that addiction is not a choice, but rather a coping mechanism for underlying emotional pain. He clarifies that the legal system’s assumption that people make conscious and deliberate choices when indulging in addictions is false. He further states that addiction is an attempt to regulate an unbearable emotional state internally through external means such as drugs, gambling, internet, sex, or shopping. Dr. Maté emphasizes that the targets of addiction may be different, but the internal effects are similar, and the sources of addiction are emotional distress and pain.

    Dr. Gabor Maté defines addiction as a behavior that brings temporary pleasure or relief, but causes negative consequences in the long term. He states that it is an addiction if a person cannot give it up, regardless of the substance. Dr. Maté explains that addictions are distributed throughout society and make up only a small part of the addicted population. He asserts that addictions are often rooted in childhood trauma, and that the more severe the trauma, the greater the risk for substance addiction and injection use. Dr. Maté also discusses his own experience as a Jewish-Canadian infant boy during World War II, who was hungry and spent his first year under the Nazi regime. He argues that children can be hurt by both abuse and neglect, and that these experiences can lead to addiction later in life.

    As a leading voice on trauma and addiction, Dr. Maté discusses his own experience of trauma as a young baby and its impact on his health and behavior. He explains that his work as a family physician and studying trauma helped him understand the role it plays in shaping people’s health and illness. He shares his experience of working with families who had health problems and how he noticed the emotional component behind their illnesses. Dr. Maté’s point of view is that chronic illnesses and diseases have unconscious stresses that people impose on themselves. These stresses arise from childhood programming, and they can affect people’s immune systems, emotional systems, hormone systems, and nervous systems, which all work together as part of the body.

    When discussing the impact of childhood experiences on our health, Dr. Gabor Maté argues that organic causes of disease, such as chronic illnesses that impact the immune system, are often related to emotional or psychological factors that were developed during childhood. Maté notes that these emotional patterns can be passed down through generations, and that they often reflect unconscious, inherited behaviours. According to Maté, there is a distinction between blame and responsibility in this context: while blame places the blame on an individual for the consequences of their actions, responsibility acknowledges that these behaviours are often not conscious or deliberate choices, but are instead the result of our experiences in our childhood.

    Maté argues that the way to address these emotional patterns is through becoming conscious of them, and then making the choice to act differently in response to both past and present circumstances. Maté points to his own personal journey as an example of the transformative power of this approach. He notes that his focus on his own emotional health has helped him to better understand the root causes of certain behaviours, which have in turn allowed him to modify them in ways that have had a significant impact on his life and his health.

    Dr. Gabor Maté goes on to discuss how childhood stress can shape an individual’s personality and health. He cites his own experiences as a Jewish infant under the Nazis, which he describes as a “stressful condition,” as an example. Dr. Maté claims that his “brain was programmed to” adapt to the stress, which led to his “addictive personality.” He argues that this was a way of surviving and soothing pain in these “shelters.” As we age, we can begin to realize that our personality is a defensive cover for our true selves. Dr. Maté also discusses the medical practice of treating high blood pressure as an appropriate response to signals from the body, despite not fully understanding the cause of hypertension. Dr. Maté argues that social pressure and stresses are the root causes of hypertension, and that addressing the sources of tension is necessary for managing blood pressure.

    Dr. Gabor Maté then discusses the importance of addressing the root cause of health problems. Dr. Maté argues that if individuals are unable to make lasting changes to their lifestyles despite trying, it suggests that they are not getting to the root cause of their problems. He suggests that his work in addiction and trauma can be applied to all aspects of human behavior and has profound implications for health. Dr. Maté emphasizes that the way young children adapt to stress in their early years can have long-term impacts on their health and behavior. He argues that it is essential to create a society that supports children and parents at a young age to prevent the negative effects of early stress and maladaptation. Dr. Maté mentions Scandinavia and their priorities towards supporting early years as an example of a society that values family and child-rearing.

    Dr. Gabor Maté also discusses the societal norms surrounding childcare and maternity in the United States and how they may be affecting the healthy development of children. He argues that historically, human societies were organized around children being around their parents, but in modern societies, there is a barbaric childcare system and maternity leave policy that separates children from their parents. This can lead to increased stress and the release of stress hormones in the child, which can interfere with their healthy brain development. Dr. Maté advises that holding and picking up children when they cry is an essential aspect of childcare that modern societies have denied.

    Dr. Gabor Maté then discusses the impact of societal changes on childhood development and overall health. He notes that many societal pressures, such as the demands of providing for a family while working, can be detrimental to both parents and children. He also discusses the importance of natural social connections and the evolutionary history of human beings, noting that the trend of urbanization and community destruction in modern society is contributing to the rise of autoimmune disease and addiction. Maté stresses that while progress and industrialization have brought many benefits, it is important to be aware of the human evolutionary heritage and incorporate it into modern societal structures in order to promote healthy development.

    Dr. Gabor Maté further discusses the importance of genuine human connection and how it is increasingly lacking in modern society. He argues that as technology becomes more prevalent, people are becoming more disconnected and isolated from one another. This lack of connection can have negative effects on mental health and can contribute to the development of addictive behaviors. Maté encourages people to prioritize real-life friendships and relationships, rather than relying on social media for connection. He believes that by building genuine connections with others, people can overcome their sense of isolation and improve their overall health and well-being.

    Dr. Gabor Maté also discusses the importance of dealing with the underlying life experiences that shape our health. According to Dr. Maté, the wound or trauma that a person received as a child can have a significant impact on their behaviors and lifestyle, and it is important to heal that wound. Dr. Maté also emphasizes the importance of owning one’s life and being the agent of their own change. Throughout his discussion, Dr. Maté highlights the power of language and the sources and meanings of words. He also reflects on a specific experience in his talk where a woman came forward to share her story of having a happy childhood, but when questioned, it became clear that there was underlying pain and a lack of acceptance. Dr. Maté believes that confidence can be a giveaway sign of a person protecting themselves from unacknowledged pain.

    Dr. Gabor Maté says the coping mechanism of suppressing emotions and ideals of a happy childhood are a form of self-defense. He provides the example of a woman named Shannon who had severe opioid addiction due to childhood adversity. Shannon’s poor health stemmed from her addiction and bloodborne infection, which was not treated despite multiple hospitalizations. Despite her addictive behavior, Shannon wanted to be helped and moved to a healthcare facility where she was able to receive the treatment she needed. This part of the interview illustrates the power of addiction as an addictive drive for some people and how early childhood patterns can shape one’s life. It also highlights the importance of seeking help for addiction and treatment for underlying issues.

    It is a personal story of a young woman who died of an overdose just three days after getting clean from drugs. He emphasizes the powerful grip that addiction has on individuals, even those who witness the devastating consequences it can have on friends and loved ones. Dr. Maté goes on to discuss his own experiences with addiction and how he has found therapy, particularly internal family systems, helpful in gaining insight into the different parts of himself that drive certain behaviors. He encourages listeners to approach addiction with compassion, not only for those struggling with it but also for themselves.

    The idea that the drugs we choose to legalize as a society have a significant impact on health and disease, Dr. Maté proposes. He argues that by criminalizing drugs like heroin and cannabis, we are failing to treat addiction as a medical problem and instead treating it as a moral failing. The host also reflects on the role of the generalist in medicine and the importance of personalized, holistic care for patients. The host notes that while specialty training is important, the role of the general practitioner should not be undervalued, as they have the ability to see the whole patient and provide emotional support. The host concludes by expressing admiration for the work of specialists while also recognizing the importance of a holistic approach to healthcare.

    Dr. Gabor Maté then discusses the importance of considering the social and relational context when approaching human health. He argues that human beings are deeply shaped by their social relationships and environment, and that a person’s illness is a reflection of their entire life and context. He notes that trauma is often overlooked in medical training, and that a physician’s limited knowledge can lead to a lack of understanding when treating patients. He also emphasizes the innate healing capacity of human beings and the need to engage and evoke this capacity in order to promote health and wellness.

    Dr. Gabor Maté also discusses the limitations of mainstream medicine and the importance of curiosity and self-discovery in personal healing. He encourages listeners to question what makes people overcome challenges such as addiction and live much longer than predicted. He also highlights the need for more faith and openness to alternative healing practices and therapies. Dr. Maté recommends that people check out his books as a starting point for their own healing journey, as he believes that his work has the potential to help millions of people around the world.

    At the end, Dr. Maté discusses his relationship with Dr. Raj Chaski and how they share a similar passion for discussing topics such as addiction, child development, stress, and health. Dr. Maté finds it delightful and pleasurable to meet colleagues who share the same interests and work towards discovering the same truths. He finds it validating to have a conversation with someone who asks the same questions as him, and considers it an honor to be able to discuss these topics with Dr. Chaski.

    YouTube Video