Tag: Jews

  • Interview with Ronald Bernard – Former Dutch Banker Working for Elites of This World

    Interview with Ronald Bernard – Former Dutch Banker Working for Elites of This World

    In this interview, Ronald Bernard, a former Dutch banker, exposes the elite’s involvement in the global financial system. He discusses how the elite has stolen the real value of money, leading to national debts and inflation. He claims that the interest rate at the top of the pyramid is added to the capital, and the rules, laws, and organizations ensure that the bottom layer stays in place to avoid the wealthy becoming overpowered.

    Bernard highlights how the elite uses gas prices and inflation as their primary methods for depleting the masses’ purchasing power and extracting their value. Additionally, he discusses the European Central Bank’s role in creating new money every month to increase inflation and steal value from the population. Bernard calls out the elite for their deceptive and exploitative methods in the financial and economic systems.

    Later, Ronald Bernard talks about the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) and its role in the financial crisis, arguing that it has not been used as intended but rather by banks for their own gain. He then talks about the lack of change in the current political system, calling it a puppet system where individuals start working for the higher powers once in a coalition, rather than the people.

    He also discusses his experience with becoming a social entrepreneur after going through trauma processing and his involvement in an inner circle of a religion that involves organ trafficking and child exploitation. He talks about the difficulty faced in disclosing these iniquities and the need to continue challenging unjust practices in the world.

    Detailed Description

    In the interview, which is in Dutch but dubbed over in English, Ronald Bernard talks about his background and experiences in the financial sector. He has always been an entrepreneur at heart and enjoys the independence it provides. While working in import/export, he encountered different currencies and had to trade through brokers, and his broker suggested he consider making more money through the financial world by trading in assets to make money from differences in interest rates. He agreed and took over the broker’s spot but asked for a commission. The broker warned him that it came at a great cost and that he couldn’t do it with a clear conscience. However, Bernard was already used to putting his conscience in the “freezer” as a survival mechanism due to his difficult upbringing.

    He goes on to discuss his experience working in the financial world and the small, circular nature of the global flows of money. He explains that banks and other financial institutions use certain financial constructions and international legislation to move money in a way that makes everything appear to be legitimate to supervisors and regulatory bodies worldwide. He also talks about his role in changing currencies and the use of money in the retail market. He uses the example of the Iraqi dinar, which was backed by oil and had value officially, to illustrate the importance of understanding the relationship between money and oil in global trade.

    When exposing the elite’s involvement in money laundering and how they manipulate society through rules and regulations, Ronald Bernard recounts his experience working as a banker in Germany and their task of processing cash in such a way that it can be legally reintroduced into the money circulation. Bernard revealed that the bank is filled to maximum capacity with dollars and needed to be emptied to make way for German marks. Bernard also highlights how Iraq’s representatives wanted to remain free from accusations and were all friends on the same side, despite appearances to the contrary. Bernard’s job was to process the cash without being detected, and he had to have nerves of steel to do so. He played at the highest level for about five years but eventually gave up, seeing it as an intense moment in his life.

    Ronald Bernard then discusses his experience working in the financial world and the knowledge he gained about the real world through his clients, which included banks, governments, multinationals, and even terrorist organizations. He talks about the connections he saw between these groups and the flows of money that went from one place to another. Bernard also discusses the role of secret services and how they are involved in the financing of walls, creating conflict and misery in the world. He reflects on the realization that the entire world as we know it is just an illusion, something he learned through his work in the financial world. Despite this knowledge, he acknowledges that there were things happening in his life that he did not expect, such as his freezer malfunctioning. Overall, Bernard describes the financial world as complex and full of hidden truths, and his experiences within it as eye-opening.

    He also discusses his involvement in massive dumping of currency which reduced the value of Italian businesses and caused them to go bankrupt. He talks about a successful deal with the Italian lira and how it resulted in the company going bankrupt. He then shares his own personal experience with volunteering with a religious group that played with dark and demonic imagery, including Satanism. He acknowledges the fact that some people take these things seriously and that it can be difficult to speak about due to his conscience not being perfectly aligned with these circle’s beliefs.

    Ronald Bernard goes on to talk about how he came to refuse assignments and became suspicious of the world around him. He mentions blackmailing and the use of mind-control in politics and business, and discusses how he studied theology and psychology to make sense of what he was experiencing. He also mentions the Protocols of Zion and recommends that everyone read and study the document.

    The use of fear and deception to control humanity is also discussed, and then he talks about the luciferian entity and how it wants to divide humanity based on politics, skin color, and religion, in order to weaken them. Bernard highlights the importance of standing up for ourselves and our beliefs in order to overcome this entity and its agenda. He encourages his listeners to open their eyes to the true creation, one that is based on love and unity. Bernard also discusses the concept of a powerful being that can appear with just a little light, and that can help us overcome a long period of darkness.

    After that, he discusses his near-death experience and the intense experience he had upon his departure from the world of banking. He acknowledges that he has seen how the elite were working on him and talks about the physical and emotional torture he experienced. He also talks about the realization that he is not just his body but a vessel in the physical world. He mentions that his end of the first life was so extreme that he could not handle it any longer, but his mind power was so strong that it only happened to his own body. He also talks about how he had wished to take drugs and alcohol to make his end gentler, but we know that most colleagues in the banking world are already dead by now. He then talks about the pyramid-shaped financial system used by the elite to control the world’s money and banks. The pyramid-shaped financial system, headquartered in Switzerland and Belgium, has a system that starts at the top with eight thousand eight or five hundred people giving orders, and the mechanism is a pyramid-shaped system that propagates downward to be executed.

    He goes into detail discussing the Basel Institute for Banking Supervision (BIS) and its role in the global financial system. The BIS, originating from the Netherlands in 1930, is recognized worldwide as the headquarters of the financial world, with every central bank being a member of this civil organization. The headquarters agreement describes the BIS’s range of power, authorization, level of operations, and output. The BIS has complete immunity from everything on earth, including its own police service, making it a fully recognized immune state beyond the grasp of any rules. The speaker also discusses the BIS’s role during World War I, where it facilitated the trading of gold between enemies. The BIS also calculates the amount needed for countries to ensure they will never be able to pay off their debts, enabling them to increase their grip on countries or continents.

    The speaker then talks about the city of London as a financial hub and a player in the global financial system. He mentions the concept of a free state, where institutions like Vatican City, Washington DC, and the BIS in Basel are immune from regulation and do not answer to anyone. The speaker goes on to explain how money is created based on debt in an economy, and how the interest rate is used as one of the mechanisms to regulate credit and control the financial pyramid. The speaker argues that the continuous stream of debt and interest rates causes a global shortage and contributes to the global misery experienced by people in society.

    Ronald Bernard then discusses how the elite has stolen the real value of money, leading to national debts and inflation. He claims that the interest rate at the top of the pyramid is added to the capital, and the rules, laws, and organizations ensure that the bottom layer stays in place to avoid the wealthy becoming overpowered. Bernard highlights how the elite uses gas prices and inflation as their primary methods for depleting the masses’ purchasing power and extracting their value. Additionally, he discusses the European Central Bank’s role in creating new money every month to increase inflation and steal value from the population. Bernard calls out the elite for their deceptive and exploitative methods in the financial and economic systems.

    As an informer, he says calculations by economists show that 80% of people pay interest throughout their lives while only 10% receive it and another 10% pay out interest to the system. Additionally, the informer highlights the historical background of interest rates being illegal and punishable by death, but it is now common in Islamic banking, despite the legalization of interest being against Islamic morality. The informer also takes issue with private banks’ influence in the financial system, which he argues has no oversight and is not accountable to the public. Finally, the informer discusses the European Stability Mechanism, an institute created by a vote from the House of Representatives in 2012, and notes that it is a protected, free state with employees receiving indemnification and immunity.

    He explains that the ESM mechanism is designed to ensure that any required amount of money, ranging from 10 billion to 100 billion euros, is delivered by the Netherlands within seven days. However, the speaker argues that most of the money sent through the ESM is not reaching the intended recipient countries but is instead being used by banks for their own gain. The speaker uses the example of Greece as an illustration, noting that a lot of money has been sent through the ESM but only a small percentage has reached Greece. Instead, he argues that the money is being channeled through Germany, France, and the Netherlands to its own banks. The speaker notes that the rich are getting richer as a result, while the poor are getting poorer. The speaker also talks about the role of multinationals and pharmaceutical companies in the financial crisis. He argues that these companies are profiting from the financial crisis and that their immunity is allowing them to get away with anything. He describes this as the world’s biggest villains’ dream come true. Overall, the speaker argues that the financial crisis is a result of a system that has been designed to favor the wealthy and powerful at the expense of the poor. He calls on people to become aware of this system and to take action to bring about change.

    Ronald Bernard then discusses the current political system and the lack of change in the last 40 years, particularly in political topics such as healthcare and the economy. Bernard notes that political parties are filled with people who are dedicated to their principles and desire to make a change, but once a coalition is formed, they immediately start working for the higher powers rather than the people. Bernard calls these individuals “puppets” and argues that they are responsible for manipulating the media to keep their actions hidden from the public. Bernard mentions several examples of small groups of people who have made it onto political stages but receive little attention from the mainstream media or are otherwise ignored. He believes that the movement of the people is needed to bring about real change to the system.

    When discussing his experience with becoming a social entrepreneur after going through trauma processing, he talks about the negative mentality of the Dutch society and how they often break down success that is essential for humanity. Bernard believes that getting clean inside and becoming strong through drama processing is the key to overcoming this negativity and to successfully realizing manifestations. He also mentions the tremendous impact his interview has had worldwide, with over 18 million people watching it, and the current power structure of the financial system being exposed. However, Bernard acknowledges that his focus was initially on himself and his creation, and he did not expect the interview to have such a widespread impact.

    In his own words, Ronald Bernard started an initiative in the past, but the fear and lack of trust made it difficult for him to succeed. He mentioned the Protocols of Zion, which he believes are a matter of conscious control and were written in ancient texts. Bernard also talked about how people around the world are praying for teams to support him and his work, while others try to prove that he is a liar. He admits that there are a lot of people who try to use his past as an argument to discredit him, but he believes that what he is doing is important. He also mentions that the fear of change is what keeps people from realizing the truth and that many people are afraid of the truth coming out.

    Eventually, Ronald Bernard discusses his involvement in an inner circle of a religion that he believes to be sick and involves organ trafficking and child exploitation. He talks about how he ended up in the inner circle through an invitation from a colleague and how it was initially supposed to be another type of event, but the truth about it was shocking. He also talks about how children organs are taken from the burnout nurses in India, and no one is talking or taking action about it.

    This organized trafficking and child abuse he sis operate on a large scale, including cases where perpetrators are acquitted despite evidence of their crimes. He claims that children are damaged from an early age and that allowing such behavior contributes to a sick world and impending war. Bernard urges people to wake up and take responsibility for their actions. He has personally experienced child abuse and has committed himself to protecting the children and making a positive change in the world.

    Ronald Bernard emphasizes that his and his family’s privacy are important to them, and that they do not share everything about themselves on the internet. He then talks about the theme of a curriculum vitae (CV) in the Netherlands and how he has not wished to write one about his past life because everything he did in official companies had a deeper layer to it. He also notes that getting a seat on the stock exchange was not just a coincidence but rather a result of many years of being busy and active as an entrepreneur.

    He explains that people in circles of power are unlikely to come forward or testify about wrongdoings, especially if it may damage their relationships or reputations. He notes that he has personally recovered from trauma experienced during his time as an insider in the banking industry, despite facing challenges in receiving validation and support for his claims. He highlights the specific challenges of trying to reveal information worldwide, and the many people who may not believe his testimony. Despite these challenges, Bernard notes his determination to continue challenging unjust practices and the need to protect children and demand accountability.

    Ronald Bernard concludes the three part interview by speaking about the connection between trade and human trafficking, specifically child labor. He emphasizes the tragic consequences of these practices, with an estimated 17,000 children dying every day from hunger and thirst. Bernard highlights the need for individuals to take action and stand up against these injustices, stating that more and more people are becoming aware and taking action. He believes that this movement could lead to meaningful change in the world.

  • Rabbi Yaakov Shapiro on Incompatibility of Judaism and Zionism

    Rabbi Yaakov Shapiro on Incompatibility of Judaism and Zionism

    Rabbi Yaakov Shapiro of True Torah Jews attended, along with 15,000 other Rabbis, a Torah Jewry Against Zionism convention held at New York’s Nassau Memorial Coliseum in 2018. The convention’s main subject was The Incompatibility of Judaism and Zionism.

    In the video, Rabbi Yaakov Shapiro explores the fundamental differences between Judaism and Zionism and says that Zionism aims to supplant Judaism and the two belief systems are incompatible.

    Rabbi Yaakov Shapiro contends that Zionism bases Jewish identity on political and national considerations, while Judaism is rooted in faith and God’s teachings. He warns against the propaganda spread by Zionism and emphasizes the significance of rejecting militaristic tendencies.

    Overall, Rabbi Yaakov Shapiro encourages Jews to be proactive in upholding and defending their religious beliefs.

  • Attack on USS Liberty by Israel – Rescue Helicopter Co-Pilot Testimony

    Attack on USS Liberty by Israel – Rescue Helicopter Co-Pilot Testimony

    Wayne Stiles, a co-pilot on the first rescue helicopter to reach the USS Liberty after it was deliberately attacked by Israel on June 8th, 1967, describes the mission. He explains that due to the extent of the ship’s destruction, they had to hover at 25 feet and use a hoist cable to bring the wounded up to the helicopter.

    In his testimony, Stiles recounts the events of the morning, including seeing blood flash back and forth in a machine gun emplacement in the forward gun tub. He later learned that two or three crew members had been machine gunned to death while trying to defend against the Israeli attack.

    Wayne Stiles also notes that there was another helicopter squadron on board which had larger helicopters and completed the evacuation in the afternoon. Overall, Stiles describes the mission as a difficult and shocking experience.

  • Katherine Watt on Militarization of Public Health and Use of Military for Implementing Globalist Agenda

    Katherine Watt on Militarization of Public Health and Use of Military for Implementing Globalist Agenda

    In this video, Katherine Watt discusses the militarization of public health and the use of the military as a front for implementing a global agenda by central bankers. She explains how the US Department of Defense and the World Health Organization (WHO) are using various tactics such as propaganda, censorship, fear tactics, and toxic vaccines to establish control over the world’s population. Watt traces the origins of this agenda back to 1969 and highlights the financial coercion mechanisms and legal loopholes involved. She also discusses the consolidation of power within global health organizations and the establishment of programs that erode individual rights and transfer control to these organizations. Watt concludes by stating that as more states reclaim their authority to protect their citizens, there will be a tipping point leading to criminal prosecutions against these globalists.

    Katherine Watt starts by discussing the concept of public health being militarized and how the military is being used as a public health front. She refers to it as a “kill box,” which is a military term for establishing a geographic area for a military attack. Katherine Watt explains that the goal of the Department of Defense (DOD) and the World Health Organization (WHO) is to set up the entire world as their target population, using various weapons such as propaganda, censorship, fear tactics, and toxic vaccines. She claims that this project has been going on for centuries, with globalist central bankers seeking complete control over human beings. She also mentions the financial coercion mechanisms involved, where compliance with public health measures is tied to access to financial services. On the legal side, she traces the origins of this agenda back to 1969.

    Katherine Watt then discusses the establishment of the chemical and biological warfare program by the U.S. Congress and the loopholes built into the law to justify it. She explains that these loopholes allowed research and weapons development for “protective or prophylactic or defensive” purposes. Watt argues that this characterization is false because all biologically active products are inherently toxic and aggressive. She also mentions the creation of the Public Health Emergencies program and the National Vaccine program, both of which were instrumental in setting up liability exemption for manufacturers and funneling vaccine injury cases into a separate compensation program.

    Watt points out that the World Health Organization (WHO), which she considers a military organization, played a crucial role in transferring sovereign government power from nation-states to the WHO and the Bank for International Settlements (BIS). She highlights amendments to international health regulations in 2005 that aimed at strengthening surveillance, testing, detention, quarantine, and forced treatment during international outbreaks of communicable diseases. Despite the pretext of protecting international trade, Watt argues that the real intention was to establish legal systems that transferred power to global health organizations. She also mentions the establishment of the Emergency Use Authorization program and the transfer of CBRN weapon stockpile control.

    Katherine Watt continues by discussing the establishment of program management structures in the early 2000s, following the events of 9/11 and the anthrax attacks. This was done through various statutes such as the 2000 Public Health Threats and Emergencies Act and the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force, which effectively put the country into a permanent state of war.

    Katherine Watt argues that these actions essentially created a de facto covert global martial law act by the US government, making everyone a presumptive combatant or enemy target. She also highlights the merging of various government agencies through acts like the Patriot Act and the Homeland Security Act.

    Additionally, Katherine Watt mentions the Other Transactions Authority, which was revealed through Pfizer’s motion to dismiss a whistleblower case, stating that the COVID-19 vaccines were DOD prototypes and didn’t require valid clinical trials or FDA authorization. She argues that all of this has led to a massive funding stream for military-led bioweapons research and use, eliminating informed consent and shielding the government and stakeholders from liability. She sees this as a joint project between the US Department of Defense, the Federal Reserve, the World Health Organization, the Bank for International Settlements, and the United Nations.

    At the end, Katherine Watt discusses the actions taken by globalists against states and provinces that pass laws protecting informed consent and consumer safety. She mentions a report released in October 2022 that criticizes state laws limiting public health protections, stating that the globalists are not in favor of such laws. Watt believes that as more states reclaim their authority and implement measures to protect their citizens, there will be a tipping point leading to criminal prosecutions. She emphasizes that the evidence against these globalists is strong and their attempts to defend themselves using national security only further reinforce the need for action against their crimes.

    Video

  • Former FBI Chief Ted Gunderson Discusses Cases of Satanic Ritual Abuse

    Former FBI Chief Ted Gunderson Discusses Cases of Satanic Ritual Abuse

    Former FBI Chief Ted Gunderson discusses various cases related to satanic ritual abuse, organized child kidnapping rings, and the use of tactics to control the masses by infiltrating secret organizations and creating traumatic environments.

    He also discusses the Illuminati and their goals, the prevalence of satanic cults in America, and the discovery of tunnels at a school where children were allegedly subjected to abuse.

    Gunderson provides evidence of corruption within the government and the mainstream media controlled by powerful people and politicians. Finally, he emphasizes the importance of educating oneself and sharing information with others to combat these issues.

    Later, FBI Chief Ted Gunderson touches on an audience member’s question about where to go for help if they cannot trust the police or government. Gunderson offers his help and phone number as a point of contact and advises people to confirm conversations with the police in writing via certified mail.

    He also discusses his belief in the Illuminati’s control over multiple government agencies and the chemtrail controversy. The video also features a mother’s heart-wrenching story of her children’s victimization by a satanic abuser and her plea for help from the community to stop the abuse of children.

    00:00:00

    In this section, former FBI Chief Ted Gunderson recounts a private investigation he conducted into the case of Dr. Jeffy R. McDonald, who was convicted of murdering his wife and two children at Fort Bragg, North Carolina in 1970. Gunderson obtained a signed confession from Melina Stokely, a member of a satanic cult who said that the murders were committed by her cult group during her initiation. In his investigations, Gunderson noticed the evidence was often lost, destroyed, or stolen and saw signs of corruption, indicating the existence of a network involved in drugs, pedophilia, pornography, prostitution, and other illegal activities.

    00:05:00

    In this section, Ted Gunderson, a former FBI chief, discusses his belief that there is a extensive conspiracy that involves pornography, drugs, corruption, pedophilia, organized child kidnapping rings, the CIA, and more. He specifically mentions an organization in Washington, D.C. called the Finders, which he claims is a CIA front involved in international trafficking of children. Gunderson also discusses the Illuminati and their 25 goals, which includes preaching liberalism and using ideas of freedom to bring about class wars. He urges people to educate themselves and share his research and books with others.

    00:10:00

    In this section, former FBI Chief Ted Gunderson discusses the 14 goals of the Illuminati, which include the use of force and invisible power resources, mob psychology, alcohol and drugs to corrupt the youth, seizing property, controlling the press, and creating obedient candidates for public office. Gunderson also provides evidence of the government’s involvement in drug operations and the mainstream media being controlled by powerful people and politicians. He concludes by stating that the Illuminati’s tactics are still being used today by the men behind the scenes.

    00:15:00

    In this section, Ted Gunderson talks about the tactics used by those in power to control the masses, including fermenting traumatic situations, creating industrial depression and financial panics, and infiltrating secret organizations such as Freemasonry for their own purposes. He also discusses the use of subliminal messages in political logos and the importance of building up armaments with police and soldiers for protection. Additionally, Gunderson mentions Presidential Directive 25, a classified secret which allows the U.S. President to transfer power to the Secretary General of the United Nations in the event of a crisis. Finally, he warns about the dangers of outcome-based education programs and the use of national and international laws to destroy civilization.

    00:20:00

    In this section, former FBI chief Ted Gunderson discusses the satanic cult movement in America and its connection to the Illuminati. He discusses how the writings of Alistair Crawley, a well-known occultist, are used as a guide for these satanic cults, including the practice of human sacrifice. Gunderson estimates that there are over 3 million practicing Satanists in America and that around 50,000 individuals are sacrificed every year during the eight basic Satanic holidays. He also notes that the federal government recognizes Satanism as a religion. However, records related to a case involving Linda indicate that the word Satanism was brought up by her husband’s defense attorney, and the records have been sealed.

    00:25:00

    In this section, former FBI Chief Ted Gunderson discusses the Satanic Ritual Abuse that takes place in the world. He mentions that this movement has set up preschools worldwide for the purpose of getting their hands on children. In Linda Wiggins’ case, the children have been exposed to sex from the time her ex-husband got his hands on those babies right up to the present time. Gunderson talks about the McMartin case, where children had said they were taken into tunnels under the school and were sexually molested involved in ceremonies with adults with robes, candles, chanting, adults with no clothes on under their robes, and brought back in time for the parent to pick up the kids. Authorities didn’t find anything, and it took 34 days to dig tunnels under the school.

    00:30:00

    In this section, former FBI Chief Ted Gunderson discusses the discovery of tunnels at a school where children were allegedly subjected to satanic ritual abuse. The tunnels were found during the trial of Ray Bucky, who was accused of being involved in the abuse. Despite strong evidence and the children’s identification of prominent figures as perpetrators, the tunnels were not used as evidence in the trial. The tunnels were hand-dug, with a triangular or semi-circular shape, and were wide enough for children to walk through. The entrance to the tunnel was later filled in, with a plastic Disney bag found buried beneath the ground.

    00:35:00

    In this section, the details of the underground tunnels connected to McMartin Preschool and the artifacts discovered in the tunnels are discussed. The tunnels were found to extend from the bathrooms off the school’s office and classroom to the front yard of the triplex next door, concealed from the street by a three-car garage. Archaeologists discovered that the floor of the 39 by 41-inch area under a hole cut in this neighbor’s bathroom, where the kids said they were being taken up through a trapdoor, had been excavated and subsequently tilled. The artifacts discovered in the tunnels included small white plastic clay with three pentagrams hand-drawn on the top, animal bones, and a plastic Disney bag.

    00:40:00

    In this section, former FBI Chief Ted Gunderson discusses his investigation into satanic ritual abuse at a site in Crestline, California. Gunderson discovered tunnels and satanic symbols at the site but when he offered the information to the prosecutor in the McMartin case, they were not interested. Gunderson describes the symbols found, including the number 666 and the Seal of Amazon, and explains their significance in satanic ritual practices. He notes that the site was highly inaccessible and likely used for secretive purposes.

    00:45:00

    In this section, former FBI Chief Ted Gunderson discusses two cases related to satanic ritual abuse. The McMartin case, one of the most publicized abuses of children, involved multiple allegations against a preschool. Although private investigators had gathered significant evidence, the case failed, and no one was held responsible. In addition, he worked with Lou Bear, whose children had told him about being sexually molested and exposed to satanic activities. Although Gunderson had visual evidence to present during Lou’s trial, the judge would not allow him to testify. Gunderson shows multiple drawings made by children related to the abuse, one of the most notable being the presence of goat’s head on a totem pole, which pointed towards the highest level of satanism present in the case.

    00:50:00

    In this section, the speaker discusses a case involving a group of children who were seen in a park in Tallahassee, Florida in 1987. The police were called and traced the van back to a group called the Finders in Washington DC. The Metropolitan Police Department raided the Finders headquarters and found paraphernalia related to international trafficking of children. It was later discovered that the CIA was involved in this covert operation to traffic children all over the world. The speaker also mentions the MK Ultra experiments with mind control on children and emphasizes the corruption at play in this case.

    00:55:00

    In this section, a woman recounts her experience of discovering that her children were being abused by a Satanic cult. She initially had no idea what was happening, but her children’s strange and disturbing behavior ultimately led her to a hospital where she learned that her case was a “classic case of SRA,” or Satanic ritual abuse. Despite seeking help from various organizations, she found that no one wanted to acknowledge the existence of SRA, and she ultimately lost everything she owned as a result of her efforts to protect her children.

    01:00:00

    In this section, a mother speaks about how her life has been destroyed due to her children being victims of Satanic ritual abuse. She talks about her own children, who she says have lived with a satanic abuser, and how it’s difficult for her to deal with it all alone. She also shares a heartbreaking story of an 8-year-old boy who was crucified alive and skinned. She urges everyone to unite against this issue and help save John and Ben, her own children, so that a precedent is set to stop this from happening to any more children. She asks for help through prayer, donations, letters, and forming a task force to save everyone else affected.

    01:05:00

    In this section of the video, an audience member asks the former FBI chief Ted Gunderson where they should go if they have a problem and they can’t trust the police or the government. Gunderson offers to help and gives out his phone number as a point of contact. He advises anyone who talks to the police to confirm their conversation in writing via certified mail. When asked about the JonBenet Ramsey case, Gunderson states that the signs of Satanic ritual abuse were evident, as is often the case in cases involving pedophile rings and occult activity.

    01:10:00

    In this section, former FBI Chief Ted Gunderson discusses his belief that a conspiracy group called the Illuminati has infiltrated multiple government agencies, including the FBI, CIA, Military Intelligence, and NSA. He notes that the CIA has been called the enforcement arm of the Council on Foreign Relations, which he believes is controlled by the Rockefeller and Rothschild families through the Federal Reserve and Bank of England. He also discusses the chemtrail controversy and the pilots who are allegedly dropping chemicals on people, urging them to come forward and share their stories anonymously.

    YouTube Video

  • Interview with Captain Dan Hanley – Airline Pilot and 9/11 Whistleblower

    Interview with Captain Dan Hanley – Airline Pilot and 9/11 Whistleblower

    Captain Dan Hanley, a former commercial airline pilot and aviation whistleblower, spoke on The Michael Decon Program about the corruption and safety concerns present in the airline industry, particularly in regards to the events of 9/11.

    Hanley founded the website 911 Pilot Whistleblowers to expose the fact that the 9/11 planes were remotely controlled, and that neither the hijackers nor experienced pilots could have flown the flight profiles at the given speed and altitude.

    Hanley also discussed his personal experience, including being illegally terminated by United Airlines for speaking out about safety issues and the grounding of pilots who are whistleblowers.

    Additionally, Hanley shared skepticism about historical events and a belief that the government and media have misled and manipulated the public.

    When speaking about the damage done to the Pentagon, Hanley provided evidence that a 757 plane struck the building and described the off-body parts and identifiable passengers found as proof of a plane crash.

    Hanley also expressed his belief that a group of powerful people, including Mossad, CIA, MI6 and the Rothschild cabal, were behind the attacks.

    He discussed his experiences as a federal whistleblower and the lack of response he received from relevant government agencies when he attempted to bring forth evidence.

    Hanley encouraged individuals to speak out until justice is served and provided tips on what to do in case of a nuclear explosion.

    00:05:00

    Captain Dan Hanley, a former commercial airline pilot, received a plethora of certifications and flew different aircraft in his 35-year career. He shared his experience flying for the Navy during the Cold War and his tenure at United Airlines. However, his career ended due to his vocal opinions on the safety and security implications of the 9/11 events, and he was illegally terminated. In this section, Captain Hanley emphasizes that he, as an experienced aircraft pilot, could not have flown the 9/11 flight profiles at the given speed and altitude, especially the Pentagon profile, and neither could the alleged hijackers.

    00:10:00

    In this section, Captain Dan Hanley, who worked as an airline pilot, talks about his six-year fight with the US government AFAA and airline to expose the corruption in the industry. Despite evidence and witnesses, his case was dismissed. He founded a website called 911 Pilot Whistleblowers and serves as its Director and international public spokesperson. The website focuses on efforts to put a stop to the corruption that was prevalent in the airline industry, especially during the time of the 9/11 attacks. Hanley explains his personal experience during the tragedy and mentions that the website aims to shed light on the events of 9/11.

    00:15:00

    In this section, Captain Dan Hanley explains that the main purpose of the 911 Pilots organization is to demonstrate that the planes used in the attack were remotely controlled through a system called the uninterrupted autopilot. According to Hanley, this system allows a remote source to take complete control of the aircraft autopilot and flight management computer, and fly it to its target. Hanley has been trying to recruit active and retired pilots to attest to the fact that neither the hijackers nor they themselves could have flown the 9/11 flight profile. Hanley cites the example of the Pentagon profile flown by a 29-year-old Saudi Arabian hijacker named Hani Hanjour, who was a poor student and could barely speak English, and the maneuver he made in his first attempt was nearly impossible even for experienced pilots. Hanley suspects that there might be more to the story behind the alleged hijackers.

    00:20:00

    In this section of the interview, Captain Dan Hanley discusses the suspicious activities of one of the 9/11 hijackers, Hani Hanjour, prior to the attacks. Hanjour attempted to rent a single-engine airplane but was found to be an incompetent pilot by instructors who evaluated him. Despite this, Hanjour was later able to skillfully maneuver a commercial airliner during the attacks. Hanley believes that this evidence has been covered up by the FBI and the 9/11 Commission, and shares his attempts to track down witnesses and present this information to the government.

    00:25:00

    In this section, Captain Dan Hanley discusses the lack of a criminal investigation into the 9/11 attacks and the failures of the 9/11 commission to address the questions and concerns of the victims’ families. He explains that the commission was underfunded, time-constrained, and set up to fail, with the executive director having the final report outlined before the commission began their work. Additionally, no pilots were allowed to testify before the commission regarding the absurd assertion that the terrorists were able to fly the planes into the World Trade Center towers. Hanley also shares his experience of being grounded permanently by the FAA under the guise of being mentally unstable after speaking out about safety and security concerns in the airline industry.

    00:30:00

    In this section of the interview, Captain Dan Hanley discusses his efforts to raise safety concerns with his employer, United Airlines, and the union that represented him. Despite following Federal Aviation Administration regulations and submitting multiple reports to his employer and union, he was stonewalled and eventually grounded for “psychological” reasons. When he sought legal advice from mental health professionals, he was advised to undergo psychological evaluations to protect himself and ensure that he was fit to fly, but United Airlines used the results of these evaluations to further justify their decision to ground him.

    00:35:00

    In this section, Captain Dan Hanley discusses how he was told to submit to the Employee Assistance Program after an incident with a flight attendant, which was endorsed by the company, union, and FAA. After flying to Chicago and meeting with a flight surgeon, he was taken to a mental health facility without realizing it and was diagnosed with bipolar disorder by a psychologist who had no knowledge of aviation. Despite having evidence and recorded conversations, he was ignored by the government after trying to report the situation and ultimately went through a tough experience that impacted his wife and children.

    00:40:00

    In this section of the interview, Captain Dan Hanley discusses how whistleblowers in the airline industry are treated by the government and how it affects their families. He shares his story of losing his 27-year marriage and two children who blame him for the divorce. Hanley is no longer a U.S citizen because of what he experienced as a whistleblower. He is now part of the Whistleblowing Airline Pilots Association, a grassroots organization that aims to expose the wrongful process of eliminating whistleblowing pilots in the industry. Hanley had lost his 35-year career and reputation as a pilot, while his children were the ultimate cost.

    00:45:00

    In this section, Captain Dan Hanley and Michael Decon discuss the patriotism that was pumped up after 9/11, even though it was a façade and the government deluded people with false patriotism. Furthermore, the media worked with the government to instigate patriotism, and we have witnessed this again, even with the recent COVID pandemic. Hanley asserts that the CIA exists not to solve problems but to create them, and this is evident in their involvement in JFK’s assassination, their lies about weapons of mass destruction, and their use of hijackers as their assets. Hanley believes that various groups, such as the Bilderberg, the Rothschild Cabal, and the 13 Bloodlines, collaborated for years to plan 9/11. Additionally, he questions American gullibility from historical events such as Pearl Harbor.

    00:50:00

    In this section of the interview, Captain Dan Hanley discusses his skepticism of various historical events, including the Kennedy assassination, the Gulf of Tonkin incident, Operation Paperclip, and the official narrative of the 9/11 attacks. Hanley shares his belief that 9/11 and other events were a test of global gullibility and that the media is complicit in propagating false narratives. He also mentions a book by a physics professor from the University of Punjab who claims that bin Laden died in 2005 and was fired and thrown in jail when he spoke publicly about it. A caller also shares their experience of being told not to take a mental test by their union and a mechanic’s belief that they installed a box in the plane that crashed.

    00:55:00

    In this section, Captain Dan Hanley is interviewed on The Michael Decon Program about the existence of an autopilot system that could have taken control of the airplane during the 9/11 attacks. An avionics technician named Wayne Anderson saw this system in operation back in 1996 on a Boeing 757 and had given an interview after which he was chastised by McDonald Douglas. The system has existed in some form since 1944 and is derived from cruise missile technology. Captain Hanley and the caller on the show agree that it would have been impossible for the hijackers to navigate and control the planes manually. The accuracy of navigation systems on modern commercial jet aircraft is such that when the weather is below a certain visibility, pilots are required to Auto Land the airplane, where it tracks the center line of the runway until the Pilot disconnects the autopilot.

    01:00:00

    In this section, Captain Dan Hanley and Michael Decon discuss the controversy surrounding what hit the Pentagon on 9/11. The argument has been whether it was a missile or American 77, or if an airplane was even involved at all. Hanley shares that there were 99 pilot whistleblowers who couldn’t have flown the plane, but he also acknowledges that many different theories exist. The FBI won’t release the camera footage around the site, which adds to the issue. They also address the fact that there are many people online who try to discredit those who question the official narrative, and that some of these individuals have been paid to do so.

    01:05:00

    In this section of the interview, the hosts and callers discuss the negative actions of the CIA and FBI, with one caller highlighting the Waco incident and Oklahoma City bombing as examples. Another caller references a Wikipedia page detailing the technology available in 1984 that allowed for remote control aircraft navigation and compares it to the advanced technology today. The hosts express the importance of educating oneself on these topics and encourage callers to share their opinions and be a part of the program.

    01:10:00

    In this section of the interview, a caller discusses his experience of witnessing the events of 9/11 in a sports bar in New Zealand and the disbelief and anger that followed. He talks about the hostile times where people were not allowed to speak against the narrative that was being pushed and how this lack of discourse allowed the official narrative to persist. They also discuss the self-censorship that is present in American culture and how it has been a factor in the ability to speak out against the narrative. Finally, they touch upon the idea that this incident was part of a larger plan that had been in the works for many years and the difficulty in discussing this narrative because of the perceived association with anti-Semitism.

    01:15:00

    In this section, the caller expresses their belief that Israelis have no business making laws in the United States and criticizes his family members who refuse to question the official narrative of 9/11. He recounts how he has been visited by the FBI several times but takes pleasure in cracking jokes with them. Later, another caller joins the show, identifying himself as being with Scientists for 9/11 Truth, and claims that there is evidence of a 757 hitting the Pentagon on 9/11.

    01:20:00

    In this section, Captain Dan Hanley was interviewed live on The Michael Decon Program. They discussed the evidence of what happened at the Pentagon during 9/11. There was a lot of misinformation about the Pentagon, with many people believing there was some sort of missile or farce happening, but the evidence shows a 757 plane caused the damage. Photos show all the damage on the first floor and the extent of the impact damage on the outside. There were videos taken that recorded the plane crossing the lawn and evidence of the right and left wingtips and engines. The recovery of the off-body parts and identification of all the actual passengers provide compelling evidence of what happened.

    01:25:00

    In this section, Captain Dan Hanley is being interviewed about his belief that a plane struck the Pentagon on 9/11, not a missile. He mentions the hate mail he receives and that his stance has been thoroughly researched. Hanley goes on to discuss his belief that it was a group of powerful people, including Mossad CIA MI6, who were behind the events of 9/11, and that the Rothschild cabal and the creation of the nation state of Israel were part of the motivation for the attacks. He also mentions that his experiences with 9/11 caused him to become interested in conspiracy theories and seeking the truth, which has become a lifelong pursuit.

    01:30:00

    In this section of the interview, Captain Dan Hanley discusses his belief that the military-industrial complex benefitted from the 6.2 trillion dollar expenditure since 9/11. He also mentions insider trading that occurred before the events of 9/11 and how it is a clear sign of a false flag. Hanley encourages people to visit 911pilot.org to read interviews with pilots around the world who all believe that the official narrative could not have been true. He also shares his experience with trying to report information concerning the crime to various government agencies, but ultimately being stonewalled for 30 months.

    01:35:00

    In this section, Captain Dan Hanley discusses his experiences with federal whistleblower cases and the lack of response he received when attempting to bring forth evidence to relevant government agencies. He shares the story of the Lawyers Committee for 9/11 Inquiry, who presented 57 evidence packages to a U.S attorney in New York, which led to the announcement of a grand jury investigation into their allegations. However, the Department of Justice, the FBI, and the National Institute of Standards and Technology blocked their evidence, and the grand jury was prevented from moving forward. Hanley talks about how they have exhausted all political and legal avenues in the United States and are now trying to reach out to the International Community to investigate the 9/11 crime.

    01:40:00

    In this section, Captain Dan Hanley emphasizes the importance of continuing to speak out about 9/11 until justice is served. He expresses optimism that the truth will eventually come to light with the power of information exchange in the information age. He also provides his social media information for those who want to follow his vocal opinions on the topic. The segment ends with a clip from a 2001 interview with Donald Trump about 9/11, where he suggests that the towers may have been brought down by bombs in addition to the planes. The host encourages listeners to keep speaking out and never stay silent about these important issues.

    01:45:00

    In this section, Captain Dan Hanley provides tips on what to do in case of a nuclear explosion, advising individuals to get inside a building and move away from windows. He goes on to suggest staying inside, shutting all doors and windows, and having a basement or getting as far into the middle of the building as possible. If one was outside after the blast, he recommends getting clean immediately, removing and bagging all outer clothing to avoid radioactive dust or ash away from the body. Finally, he advises staying tuned, following media for more information, and not stepping outside until officials say it’s safe.

    YouTube Video

  • Cult-Like Religions Based on Initiate Societies and Extreme Secrecy by James Lindsay

    Cult-Like Religions Based on Initiate Societies and Extreme Secrecy by James Lindsay

    James Lindsay first gained national attention with his co-authoring of the book “Cynical Theories: How Activist Scholarship Made Everything About Race, Gender, and Identity–and Why This Harms Everybody,” which critiques the postmodernist philosophy that has influenced many social justice movements. The book has been praised for its rigorous analysis and bold stance on a controversial subject.

    Lindsay’s most prominent argument is that the “critical social justice” movement has become a form of fundamentalism that is more interested in promoting ideology than in promoting real change.

    While some may disagree with his ideas, there is no denying that James Lindsay has made an important contribution to contemporary discourse by challenging established beliefs and encouraging critical thinking.

    In the video, James Lindsay discusses the concept of esoteric religions, which are cult-like, initiate societies that are characterized by their misuse of language and their extreme secrecy. He warns that these religions are often hidden in the shadows, and their beliefs and practices are often disguised as mainstream religion or science.

    Lindsay explains that these cults create simulacra of things that deserve authority and use fake images to occupy their space and move people out of the real thing, ultimately negating their access to the real thing and substituting a hyperreal in its place.

    He warns against the lure of hyperreality and the use of faith and truth to prevent people from falling for scams, including those that claim to have a deeper understanding of bigger truths, and concludes that reality is recalcitrant, and truth remains a leveling tool accessible to all.

    Titled “The Negation of the Real“, it’s the presentation in which James Lindsay talks about how certain movements, such as Marxism and the woke culture, rely on negative denunciations rather than positive ideas of their own.

    These beliefs lead to constructing a synthetic simulacrum, a hyper-reality where reality is negated as it contradicts their religion. This is done through the creation of social concepts, such as gender and race, leading to the idea that everything is a political construction.

    Philosophers like Hegel adopt this way of thinking, where reality is abandoned to understand their own interpretation. Lindsay argues that these movements ultimately aim to control everything, and anything that needs to be controlled is labeled as racist.

    This negation of the real undermines reason and faith, allowing Gnosis to pose as a more sophisticated and complicated version of itself. Finally, Lindsay urges people to resist this religion and identify those who traffic in it.

    00:00:00

    In this section of the lecture, James Lindsay discusses how the West has been shaped by so-called secret religions or cults, which are often overlooked or ignored. He argues that these cults have been central to the construction of the West and have played a major role in its politics, faith, science and overall development.

    Lindsay explains that if one wants to install false religions, they must negate the real religions while acknowledging that his use of the term religion is broad and includes the sciences. Through his talks, he aims to compare faith, science, and these cults to better understand how they work together.

    Lindsay asks his audience to engage in a mental exercise and imagine a world where a large ancient religion exists that is just as big as Christianity, Judaism, Islam, or Buddhism, but nobody has ever heard of it, and how this religion has been present and influenced the development of the West.

    00:05:00

    In this section, James Lindsay discusses the concept of esoteric religions, which are cult-like, initiate societies that are characterized by their misuse of language and their extreme secrecy.

    Lindsay warns that these religions are often hidden in the shadows and that their beliefs and practices are often disguised as mainstream religion or science. He sees the exposure of these religions and the development of the discernment to identify them as necessary steps to defeating them, as they cannot claim truth on their side.

    While acknowledging that the terminology and concepts associated with these religions may be overwhelming, Lindsay encourages the audience to watch the videos multiple times and at double speed to develop an understanding of these religions.

    00:10:00

    In this section, James Lindsay asks viewers to imagine that they are “crazy” and believe they had a direct encounter with God and have been told to change the world. He explains that these occult religions, like ancient hermeticism, gnosis, and gnosticism, operate on negative theology, which tears down or takes things apart, rather than positive theology, which describes the attributes of God.

    These cultures create simulacra of things that deserve authority and use the fake images to occupy their space and move people out of the real thing, ultimately negating their access to the real thing and substituting a hyperreal in its place. The only way to get people to accept this fake reality is to obliterate reality first.

    00:15:00

    In this section, James Lindsay discusses how negative thinking or critique has evolved into “woke denunciation,” which involves denouncing something in a way that supposedly announces the possibility of something different without ever having to articulate a positive argument or clear plan. He explains that this process is a form of sorcery that confuses people and gives power to those making negative arguments against others.

    Lindsay then explains that these occult, esoteric religions of the West need to displace their competitors (such as faith and science) to occupy the space they fill, so they create a counterfeit and subvert the real thing to make their own ideas look more attractive. He concludes that these confidence religions or philosophies are parasitic and latch onto something real.

    00:20:00

    In this section, James Lindsay discusses the concept of simulacra which is the idea that a copy of something can lose its relevance and resemblance to the original. He provides examples such as knockoff Rolex watches and pancake syrup, where each iteration becomes less and less like the original.

    He then compares this to the concept of performance, which is the idea that some people perform a role or identity rather than it being inherent in them. He gives examples such as communist pastors and Judith Butler, a college professor who believed that gender was a performance, which led to the negation of biological sex. This idea of negating the real in favor of a constructed reality is a theme that he believes is present in many aspects of Western culture, including religion and politics.

    00:25:00

    In this section, James Lindsay describes the Gnostic creation myth and how it is a simulation and a counterfeit of Christianity. The creator God, who is seen as God in Genesis and throughout the Bible, is actually an evil demon, the demiurge, who created the world as a prison to trap humanity and keep them from realizing they are really God.

    The serpent in the Garden of Eden was telling the truth, and Lucifer, the first savior, becomes equivalent to Christ as another savior. Lindsay warns against the lure of Gnostic cults that construct a false version of reality, and how this can extrapolate out into the creation of fiction that replaces reality, such as gender identity replacing biological sex.

    Finally, Lindsay explains how faith and reason are broad institutions that are being counterfeited, leading to false churches and institutions that claim to be something they are not.

    00:30:00

    In this section, James Lindsay discusses the concept of Gnosis and how it is an absolute, revealed knowledge that is not based on faith or reason, but on secret and esoteric teachings known only to a select few.

    He draws attention to the different meanings of the word Gnostic, including lower case Gnosticism, referring to awareness of absolute truth, and capital Gnosticism, a religious text originating from the early Christian cults of the first and second centuries that refers to the universe as a prison constructed by an evil demon.

    Lindsay argues that the point of Gnosis is not the truth of the propositions presented, but rather the meaning they affect in the hearts of the readers or listeners, leading to a revolutionary moment of reflexivity which can be a dangerous thing when people start to lose track of what they’re supposed to be fighting for.

    00:35:00

    In this section, James Lindsay discusses the difference between science and alchemy. While science seeks to understand reality and discover truths, alchemy seeks to bring about a desired state of affairs through means that may not be based in reality.

    Lindsay argues that this kind of desire for control, rooted in esoteric religions from antiquity, is what we are seeing now with the rise of woke communism or neo-communism. He emphasizes the importance of faith and reason working together, keeping each other balanced and preventing gnosticism from taking hold.

    Lindsay concludes that despite certain people claiming that reality has moved “beyond true theories and false theories,” the fact is that reality is recalcitrant and truth remains a leveling tool accessible to all.

    00:40:00

    In this section, James Lindsay talks about how snake oil and other scams have operated historically, and how the use of faith and truth can prevent people from falling for such scams. He warns about the lure of hyperreality and how people can be misled by those who claim to have a deeper understanding of some bigger truth.

    He explains how the drive to dominate others, or libido dominandi, can be behind some of these scams, and how people can be seduced by the idea that their ignorance is keeping them from deeper truths. He warns about how people may unwittingly become complicit in oppressive systems like racism and capitalism without even realizing it, and how these dynamics can be exploited by those with a financial interest in keeping people stuck and ignorant.

    00:45:00

    In this section, James Lindsay discusses the concept of hermeticism and how it relates to the idea of creating a new religion called sustainability and inclusion by taking all existing faiths, philosophy, and sciences and mashing them together. He highlights how the woke movement has colonized the sciences and uses dialectical inversion to justify their beliefs.

    They claim that everything is political, nothing is objective, and the hard sciences are not inclusive or diverse enough. They offer a new method as a solution, which they claim is data-driven and being implemented in almost every American school district. However, they do not have the data to justify it, and they dismiss any criticism as conspiracies. Hegel’s dialectical method is invoked as a formal language to explain this phenomenon.

    00:50:00

    In this section, James Lindsay discusses how Hegel’s philosophy involves negation and the shift from the real to the actual. Hegel believed that reality was abstract and that true knowledge involved understanding all of its causes and making it concrete.

    Negation, in this context, meant recognizing that one’s understanding of reality was incomplete and needed to be expanded. However, according to Lindsay, Hegel’s method led to guru-ship and a cult-like practice, attracting grifters and abusive psychopaths to take advantage of people.

    Additionally, Hegel’s reliance on circular reasoning and his dismissal of other viewpoints as false or partial knowledge shows his philosophy’s similarity to gnosticism and wizardry.

    00:55:00

    In this section, James Lindsay discusses how the real must be negated to make space for the actual, which is synthetic and concrete, projected into the future by the sorcerer. He highlights how this process is like a self-fulfilling prophecy or spellcasting, posing effectively as science and religion.

    Lindsay also delves into the concept of a Wizard’s Circle, where you are trapped and can only see what the sorcerer wants you to see, resulting in a negation of your reality. He emphasizes how this is a strategy that secret religions and esoteric religions have used throughout history, changing forms every time they are exposed.

    01:00:00

    In this section, James Lindsay discusses how the negation of the real manifests in society through the creation of a synthetic simulacrum. This is done through the construction of social concepts such as gender, race, and freedom, ultimately leading to the idea that everything is a political construction.

    The far right and postmodernists alike engage in this process. However, when the synthetic simulacrum imitates science or reason, it becomes dangerous. Expert consensus or ideologically acceptable conclusions replace true scientific methodology.

    Messages from the woke literature often fail the funnel plot technique, which involves the exclusion of scientific experiments with “wrong conclusions.” This negation of the real can be found in most major medical journals, leading to the cost of many lives and untold suffering.

    01:05:00

    In this section, James Lindsay discusses the concept of gnosis and its manifestation as politics pretending to be science. Gnosis is a belief system that portrays individuals as gods seeking to displace genuine truth and replace it with their own ideologies.

    Various movements, such as communism, Nazism, and sustainability, are all modern and post-modern forms of esoteric faiths trying to establish a single world religion. Hyper-reality is the false simulacrum of reality that these ideologies simulate to project their vision of utopia or the arrived kingdom.

    To achieve their beliefs, they must negate the real, and the first reality has to be broken to pieces and absorbed into the second reality before it can actualize. Hegel’s hyper-reality was a perfect idea of what a perfect society with perfect people would look like, using negative thinking to create a true science of history.

    01:10:00

    In this section, James Lindsay uses an absurd example to illustrate the problem with systemic thinking. He posits that if a driver runs over a pedestrian, everyone from the car maker to the coffee bean producer and medical industry can be implicated, therefore, everybody’s at fault, and everybody supports a system that causes damage.

    By following this systematic line of thinking, everybody is guilty, so we need a total system change, which, using concrete thinking, will involve lots of intermediate practical steps that are systems of control, and bad things won’t happen anymore. This is how critical car theory and critical race theory are the same theory.

    01:15:00

    In this section, James Lindsay discusses the concept of perpetual revolution, which he describes as the idea that the revolution must continue without ever stopping. He argues that this perpetual revolution is characterized by pure criticism, relentless negativity, and a constant denunciation of the world. He explains that this negative theology involves destroying reality to insert a hyper-reality that is not even clearly described.

    The goal of this perpetual revolution, according to Lindsay, is to conquer existing reality by teaching children to complain about everything being racist, sexist, harmful, or traumatic. This negative theology, Lindsay argues, is found in woke ideology, and has its roots in Hegelian and Marxist thought. Lindsay brings out the idea of apoptosis or programmed cell death which he calls programmed death of the existing society.

    01:20:00

    In this section, James Lindsay discusses Hegel’s idea of negation and negativity and its role in society. Hegel believed that negative thinking is the core and that by negating, we can get more. Furthermore, Hegel understood that there are distinctions, but these have to be lifted above or sublated to find broader categorization that returns to the one category of all things, which is the one.

    However, this concrete thinking that he is replacing reality with is structural thinking. Ultimately, in Hegel’s system of science for understanding things, we abandon reality and understand his interpretation.

    This section also discusses how Marx talks about the ruthless criticism of all that exists, which he got from Goethe’s character Mephistopheles, the voice of Satan, who said “all that exists deserves to perish.”

    01:25:00

    In this section, James Lindsay discusses the idea of negating the real, which involves the belief that everything that exists deserves to perish. When this occurs, truth becomes relative, and the Marxist hyper reality can take precedence as the science of history, which then becomes Marxism or that which forwards Marxism as a system of praxis.

    Marx believed that through negative thinking and ruthless criticism, there could be a positive Transcendence of private property as human self-estrangement. This was defined as the proper definition of communism and the ideal society they wanted to simulate through socialism.

    Marx stated that communism is the positive Transcendence of private property as human self-estrangement, which is, in turn, the real appropriation of human essence by and for man. Ultimately, communism is the riddle of history solved, and it is the true resolution of the conflict between man and nature and between man and man.

    01:30:00

    In this section, Lindsay discusses the concept of “negative thinking” and how it is used to criticize and denounce existing societal structures with the aim of envisioning new possibilities. He critiques the idea that one must have “consciousness” or be “gnostic” in order to denounce and announce a new world, comparing this to a sorcery or wizardry that is taught in woke education.

    Lindsay argues that such forms of critical consciousness do not offer any tangible solutions or descriptions of what the new world is supposed to look like. He further highlights that the lack of specificity in these ideas allows for endless demands for power, leading to an endless cycle of societal upheavals that never lead to actual solutions.

    01:35:00

    In this section of the transcript, James Lindsay discusses the origins of wokeness and how it stems from the fusion of critical theory and post-modernism into a method of knowing. Wokeness is described as gnosticism derived from esoteric secret religions, which aims to construct a hyper-real simulation in order to negate the real.

    The ultimate goal of wokeness is to control everything, and anything that needs to be controlled is labeled as racist until it is fully controlled. In this sense, wokeness allows for a pointless criticism of all that exists and reflects Marx’s desire for ruthless criticism.

    Lindsay also points out how absurd some of the woke narratives have become, such as claiming that shark week is racist because it employs too many people named Mike.

    01:40:00

    In this section, James Lindsay discusses the negation of the real and how certain movements, such as Marxist and woke ideologies, rely on negative denunciations rather than positive ideas of their own. They make no positive arguments and risk nothing, only forward the idea that their opponent’s ideology is evil.

    Lindsay explains that this tactic is similar to playing poker with someone who bets nothing and eventually ends up bankrupting the other player. Furthermore, Lindsay uses the works of Hegel and Marx to demonstrate how certain ideologies separate reason and understanding, where reason is the higher level knowing, while understanding is the lower level.

    Ultimately, Hegel believed that one must negate the real to insert magic, and this way of thinking has been adopted by many modern ideologies, creating a culture in which negation of the real is prevalent.

    01:45:00

    In this section, James Lindsay discusses the belief system of G.W.F. Hegel, a German philosopher from the early 19th century. Hegel’s system of pure reason, or the realm of pure thought, is believed to be God’s mind, logos, which represents truth without a veil.

    According to Hegel, the content of this realm is the presentation of God before the creation of nature, and through his system of science, or science of logic, he alone claims to understand the pathway for people to return to what they originally supposed to be.

    This is known as the Hermetic belief system, in which people like Hegel claim to know the presentation of God without any veil, absolute truth, and what humans must do to return to their original state, and it is the secret religion of the West.

    Philosophers, according to Hegel, are Misti or initiates into a mystery, someone who has secret knowledge or gnosis, while their duty is to write down the cabinet orders of God. This is how Hegel thinks of himself and his philosophy, and he believes it is through secret rites that man gets elevated to the Divine and assured of redemption, becoming a God and conferring immortality upon him.

    01:50:00

    In this section of the video, James Lindsay discusses the difference between cult religion and healthy religion. He explains that the religion he is referring to is a secret, esoteric religion posing as politics, science, and faith.

    The Wizards who control this religion aim to die and be reborn through hermetic magic, become Gods, and get secret gnosis and immortality. To accomplish this, they construct a hyper-reality where reality must be negated because it refutes their religion completely.

    They replace major pieces of reality with simulacra, including faith with occult belief, logic with porology, and reason with pretend reason. This negation of the real undermines reason and faith, allowing Gnosis to pose as a more sophisticated and complicated version of itself. The talk ends on the understanding that we are dealing with secret religions that have operated since antiquity throughout the West.

    01:55:00

    In this section, James Lindsay explains how a Greek concept, which was translated into Latin and spread throughout Europe, became a defining force in the destruction of society. He argues that this concept, which is now hidden in fields such as economics, politics, and science, is actually a secret esoteric religion.

    Marx turned it into a political and economic project of destruction, which has led to our current path to doom. Lindsay urges people to understand and resist this religion, identifying those who traffick in it and either bringing them back or casting them out. He also critiques cancel culture as a projection of responsibility onto others.

    YouTube Video

  • Norman Dodd Interviewed on the Hidden Agenda for World Government

    Norman Dodd Interviewed on the Hidden Agenda for World Government

    Step into a time machine and travel back to 1982 with G. Edward Griffin’s rare interview of Norman Dodd, an 83-year-old investigator for the Reece Committee.

    This revealing interview exposes the infiltration of the New World Order by large corporations that are merging the USA into a world government. Dodd delves into the infiltration of banking and the public education system, providing an eye-opening perspective on how these systems operate.

    As a member of the Reece Committee, Dodd has a wealth of knowledge on the subject of tax-exempt foundations and how they contribute to the New World Order.

    Gain a unique insight into the political and financial landscape of the early 1980s and discover the truths about the New World Order’s influence on society.

    Join G. Edward Griffin as he delves into this intriguing interview with a man who has spent his career uncovering the hidden agendas of the powerful elite.

    Interview Summary

    Norman Dodd, the former staff director of the Congressional special committee to investigate tax-exempt foundations in 1954, reveals in this video the collusion of the Carnegie Endowment, Ford Foundation, Guggenheim, and Rockefeller Foundation in controlling education in the United States.

    He discovered in his investigation that the endowments aimed to alter American history by controlling education after World War I and approached the Rockefeller Foundation to handle domestic education while the international portion would be handled by the endowment.

    The focus shifted after World War II to preventing a reversion of life in the United States to what it was before, and the key to their operations was the teaching of American history, which they attempted to alter.

    The investigation was later accused of being anti-Semitic by the Republican National Committee, which was a false accusation, and the hearings were eventually terminated due to public outrage.

    00:00:00

    In this section of the interview, Mr. Norman Dodd introduces himself and explains that he was the staff director of the Congressional special committee to investigate tax-exempt foundations in 1954. He explains that his life’s interests have always revolved around the US and its original founding.

    Having worked in manufacturing, international communication, and finally banking, Mr. Dodd was part of a major New York bank during the 1929 collapse, and during this time, his superiors asked him what the next steps were.

    00:05:00

    In this section, the speaker, Norman Dodd, talks about how he was assigned by his superiors to investigate banking policies and practices in the US, as they suspected something was not quite right. Dodd found proof that conflicting interests had been institutionalized in the banking industry since the end of World War I, which shocked him. His superior then offered him the opportunity to reorganize the bank in keeping with his own ideas, but Dodd resigned instead due to his conscience.

    00:10:00

    In this section of the transcript, Norman Dodd discusses his career in the financial world, including his resignation from a bank and subsequent difficulty finding work. He also talks about his specific interest in economics and desire to educate people about the dangers of speculative activities in the country.

    Dodd then goes on to explain his role as Director of Research for the Reese Committee, which was tasked with investigating the activities of foundations to determine if they were un-American.

    00:15:00

    In this section of the video, Norman Dodd discusses his testimony to Congress regarding the activities of large endowed foundations in the past 40 years. He defined “unamerican” as any effort to effect unconstitutional changes in the country and explained how these foundations had influenced education in a way that moved away from the principles of the Constitution.

    Dodd also speaks about his conversation with Rowan Gaither, the president of the Ford Foundation, who revealed that they had experience operating under directives that emanated from the White House and that they were currently operating under similar directives.

    00:20:00

    In this section, Norman Dodd recounts his experience with the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. After asking certain questions and requesting information from them via a letter, he was invited to come up to New York to discuss the matter further.

    There, the president of the endowment, Dr. Joseph Johnson, offered to allow a member of Dodd’s staff to examine the foundation’s minute books since its inception, saying that they could answer all the questions and their counter-suggestion would be obvious from those minutes.

    Dodd accepted and later picked a member of his staff who was initially unsympathetic toward the investigation to search the archives.

    00:25:00

    In this section, Norman Dodd recounts his conversation with Katherine Casey, who was tasked with reviewing 50 years of handwritten minutes from the Carnegie Foundation.

    Casey discovers that in 1908, the Carnegie trustees discussed the most effective means of altering the life of an entire people to be war. In 1910, they aimed to control the United States government by taking over and controlling the diplomatic machinery of the country.

    After the First World War, the focus shifted to preventing a reversion of life in the United States to what it was before. The trustees realized that controlling education in the United States was critical in this regard and approached the Rockefeller Foundation to handle domestic education, while the international portion would be handled by the endowment.

    The key to the success of these operations, they believed, was the teaching of American history, which they attempted to alter but were turned down by the prominent teachers in the country.

    00:30:00

    In this section, Norman Dodd explains how the Carnegie Foundation, in collaboration with the Guggenheim Foundation and the American Historical Association, sought to influence American history education by forming a group of 20 historians to study and shape the direction of the country.

    The study ultimately resulted in a seven-volume report, which concluded that the future of the country belonged to collectivism administered with American efficiency.

    Dodd suggests that this story emerged from the minutes of the Carnegie fund, but it was never fully presented to Congress due to opposition efforts that began from the start of the committee’s work.

    00:35:00

    In this section of the video, Norman Dodd recounts how he and his counsel were ordered to visit Wayne Hayes, the ranking minority member of the Committee on Foundations and Tax-Exempt Organizations, who initially opposed the investigation as an effort to gain notoriety.

    Despite counsel’s skepticism, Dodd convinced Hayes to support the investigation by relating to him the spread of communism and the Soviet world. However, adding a top-flight intelligence officer to Dodd’s staff resulted in the Republican National Committee and the White House attempting to stop Dodd from continuing the investigation in the direction Carol Reese had requested.

    00:40:00

    In this section, Norman Dodd explains how he was given permission to set up an independent aspect of the investigation outside of his own office, which was later opposed by the Republican National Committee and even appealed to the White House.

    The committee accused him of being anti-Semitic, which was a false accusation since there was no evidence proving it. Their true intention was to halt the completion of the investigation, which would have exposed the collaboration of the Carnegie Endowment, Ford Foundation, Guggenheim, and Rockefeller Foundation in controlling education in the United States.

    The hearings were eventually terminated due to the public outrage, and the charge of anti-Semitism remained a mystery as there was no basis for the accusation.

    00:45:00

    In this section, it is revealed that Colonel Lee Lorraine wrote a book called “Waters Flowing Eastward” that was a castigation of Jewish power in the world. However, he was dismissed from the staff due to the book’s anti-Semitic nature.

    It is further revealed that the motivation behind the creation of big foundations such as Mr. Carnegie’s was to counteract the departure of the colonies from Great Britain, and not to establish collectivism.

    But over time, the purpose and direction of the major foundations changed, and today, they firmly believe in collectivism, with the future belonging to this concept. The foundations support communist causes as they believe it represents a means of developing a monopoly that will be beneficial to them in the future.

    YouTube Video

  • Who Owns the World Documentary by Tim Gielen

    Who Owns the World Documentary by Tim Gielen

    The MONOPOLY: Who Owns the World Documentary by Tim Gielen discusses the consolidation of power in the hands of a small group of institutional investors who own the majority of shares in the world’s largest corporations across various industries. These investors include BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street, and Berkshire Hathaway, and they own the majority of shares in major tech companies, as well as food and beverage, travel, and primary industries.

    Furthermore, the documentary highlights the ownership of major media outlets around the world, which creates synchronized reporting and manipulated information. The video warns about the looming threat of a potential dystopian society resulting from the Great Reset, which aims to create a new world order where nobody owns anything, and the elites control the population’s lives by taking their possessions and vaccinating them.

    00:00:00

    In this section of the video, the narrator explains that the food and beverage industry is largely controlled by a few mega corporations, such as PepsiCo, Unilever, Coca-Cola, Mondelez, and Nestle. These companies manage the majority of money flows on earth, and their boards are controlled by the largest shareholders. By researching information on company websites and Yahoo Finance, it is discovered that just a handful of institutional investors own the majority of shares in these companies, many of which include investment companies, mutual funds, insurance companies, banks, and governments.

    00:05:00

    In this section of the documentary, the speaker discusses the consolidation of power in the hands of a small group of institutional investors who own the majority of shares in the world’s largest corporations across various industries. The four biggest investment companies, BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street, and Berkshire Hathaway, are among the top shareholders of these companies.

    This consolidation of power extends to the technology industry, where Facebook, Alphabet (parent company of Google and YouTube), Microsoft, and Twitter are among the dominant players, with the same institutional investors as their top shareholders. Even in industries such as travel, airlines, hotels, and restaurants, the same group of investors holds the majority of shares, and they also have a presence in primary industries such as mining and agriculture.

    00:10:00

    In this section, the focus is on the immense power and control of two companies, Vanguard and Blackrock, which are the largest institutional investors in the world. These two companies own shares in all major companies globally, forming a pyramid-like structure where the smaller investors are owned by the larger ones.

    This monopoly is expected to grow and collectively manage $20 trillion in investments by 2028, making it likely that Vanguard and Blackrock will own almost everything on Earth. Vanguard is the largest shareholder in Blackrock, and since its structure doesn’t allow to know who its shareholders or clients are, it becomes impossible to know who holds the power in these companies. Reports show that one percent of the world’s population owns more money than the other 99 percent.

    00:15:00

    In this section, it is revealed that 82% of all the money earned in 2017 went to the top one percent of people, many of whom are also the richest billionaires in the world. The richest families on earth own Vanguard, one of the most powerful investment companies in the world.

    These families are responsible for founding our banking system, the United Nations, and every industry in the world. They have always been at the top of the pyramid and have inherited their vast fortunes through monopolies. The private funds and non-profit organizations of these families are the largest shareholders of Vanguard.

    Non-profit organizations, in general, lack transparency, and because they do not have to disclose their donors, they are ideal for financing terrorist groups and laundering money. The three most important non-profit foundations in the world that connect all industries together are: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Open Society Foundations of George Soros, and the Clinton Foundation.

    00:20:00

    In this section, the video highlights how only two companies have a monopoly on all industries in the world, and a question is raised as to why the media does not cover this topic more widely. It is revealed that approximately 90% of the international media is owned by nine media conglomerates, including Viacom CBS, AT&T, NewsCorp, Fox Corporation, Walt Disney Company, and Comcast.

    The video explains how these conglomerates are owned by institutional investors or elite families, and shows that in almost every country on earth, the local media is in the hands of these conglomerates.

    00:25:00

    In this section, the video discusses the ownership of major media outlets around the world and how they are interconnected. It begins by highlighting Bertelsmann, which owns a large part of French mainstream media, popular Spanish TV channels, and collaborated with the Nazis in the past.

    The news media outlets do not produce their news themselves, but use information and images from news agencies such as Reuters, the Dutch AP, and the French AFP, all of which are not independent and are owned by powerful families or partially financed by governments.

    The video also sheds light on important journalistic organizations such as the European Journalism Center, which trains journalists, produces study materials, and works closely with giant corporations such as Google and Facebook.

    The article points out that there is a good chance that the text that newscasters read from their teleprompters comes from these organizations, leading to synchronized reporting. Finally, the video discusses a fund set up in September 2020 by Facebook and the European Journalism Center to support selected news organizations during the coronavirus crisis and highlights the organizations at the heart of producing our news, including the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Open Society Foundation, and Facebook and Google.

    00:30:00

    In this section, the video discusses the coordination between all industries on earth to work for the interests of the elite, including the media, politics, and the largest companies. The World Economic Forum (WEF) is identified as one of the most influential organizations in the world, with CEOs of the largest companies, heads of state, and politicians gathering at its annual meeting in Davos.

    However, critics argue that the WEF is a business forum where the wealthiest companies can negotiate deals with politicians for personal gain rather than solving global problems. The founder of the WEF, Klaus Schwab, has described in detail the plans of his organization in his book “The Great Reset,” with the COVID-19 pandemic seen as an opportunity to “reset” society and build back better.

    00:35:00

    In this section, the video explores the idea of a new world order and a global government, which is not a new concept and has been talked about by various presidents, philanthropists, and organizations such as the United Nations. The UN’s Agenda 2030 outlines a plan to eliminate poverty, hunger, and other societal problems by taxing citizens and contracting mega-corporations to rebuild society.

    The UN and the WEF also see the COVID-19 pandemic as an opportunity to push their agenda forward. The video suggests that the elite has the power to manipulate public opinion and make people believe in their plans for a new world.

    00:40:00

    In this section, the video discusses the event that took place on October 18, 2019, where around 130 important guests, including politicians and medics, gathered at the Pierre Hotel in New York City to simulate a possible scenario in the event of a global pandemic.

    The coincidence is unsettling that the simulation used coronavirus as an example, and the event was organized by the World Economic Forum, Melinda Gates Foundation, and John Hopkins Institute. Similarly, the German Robert Koch Institute conducted a similar simulation in 2012, assuming the spread of the coronavirus from animal to human, and its spread worldwide, destroying economies and even simulating protests.

    The video also includes an excerpt from a lecture that Belgian top virologist Mark Van Ranst gave on January 22, 2019, at the Chatham House in London, discussing how he fooled the Belgian population during the swine flu crisis with fear-mongering and media manipulation to impose a vaccine for a virus produced by the pharmaceutical companies he worked for.

    00:45:00

    In this section, the individual in the video explains how the media can be controlled and manipulated to spread a particular narrative. The speaker shares that by controlling early coverage during an issue, news outlets can monopolize the area and become a primary source of information.

    During the epidemic, the speaker shed light on Belgium and the UK and reported on realistic figures regarding H1N1 deaths. While discussing the topic, the speaker also shares that the elite do not have any intention to take care of the people, as they are interested in increasing their power, and global governance is the only way that they can have complete control over the population.

    00:50:00

    In this section, the video highlights the power and control that the elite, or “deep state,” have over the world. This elite group has conscripted vast human and material resources into building a machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific, and political operations. They control America, and nothing is questioned, printed, or revealed.

    The video discusses the fear-mongering tactics used by the pharmaceutical industry to keep people sick and dependent on drugs. The group also seeks to control people through blackmail, ensuring that those they control will do their bidding. The world is heading in a direction that closely resembles the dystopian society described in George Orwell’s “1984.”

    00:55:00

    In this section, the video warns of a potential nightmare situation resulting from the Great Reset, which aims to create a new world order where nobody owns anything. The elites plan to achieve this by causing a devastating economic crisis and eliminating cash money, forcing people to depend on government support, which includes giving up private possessions and accepting a vaccination passport.

    Entrepreneurs are the first to fall to this plan, while the middle class is attacked, and banks will fall. However, the video warns that this is not a doomsday scenario created by the author, but an actual plan that has been prepared for generations. The video urges people to create a great awakening and work towards a sustainable and fair world where no one goes hungry, there is no pollution, diseases, or wars, and governments work for the welfare of the people.

    01:00:00

    The conclusion of the “MONOPOLY: Who owns the world” documentary leaves viewers with hope for a future where people can lead dignified lives without excessive work and without manipulation by those in power. While acknowledging challenges ahead, the video encourages recognition of societal issues as a first step towards addressing them. The video ends with a call to action for viewers to work together towards building a more equitable society.

    01:05:00

    This section of the video concludes the documentary by sharing a message of hope for the future. The narrator believes that a future where people no longer have to work excessively to lead dignified lives, and one where those in power cannot manipulate the masses using the media and other means of control, is on the horizon. However, they acknowledge that there will be challenges ahead and that we must recognize the problems in our society to address them. The video ends with a call to action, urging viewers to embark on the journey towards a more equitable society together.

    YouTube Video

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7JRKGJS26l8