Miscopy

Tag: Terrorism

  • Christopher Bollyn Explains Israeli Connection to 9/11 and Fraudulent War on Terror

    Christopher Bollyn Explains Israeli Connection to 9/11 and Fraudulent War on Terror

    In this YouTube video Christopher Bollyn discusses the deception behind the 9/11 attacks and the subsequent war on terror. He argues that 9/11 was a hoax designed to initiate the war on terror, resulting in the loss of millions of lives and trillions of dollars. Bollyn emphasizes the need to expose this dual deception and put an end to the war. He also discusses the connection between the war on terror and Zionist interests, highlighting the role of Israel in fragmenting Arab states in the Middle East. Bollyn presents evidence of Israeli involvement in the 9/11 attacks and the war in Syria. He concludes by implicating Benjamin Netanyahu and other Jewish neocons in the construction of the 9/11 attacks, linking the evidential trail back to the Israeli government.

    Christopher Bollyn also discuss the role of influential figures like Rupert Murdoch in controlling the media narrative. Additionally, the speaker highlights the involvement of Mossad and Israeli companies in airport security, as well as the inconsistencies and anomalies surrounding the collapse of the World Trade Center towers. Overall, the speaker suggests a dual-deception, where the narrative of 9/11 and the War on Terror is carefully controlled to serve specific interests and calls for people to seek genuine peace and resist the fraudulent war.

    Israeli Connection to 9/11 and Fraudulent War on Terror

    Christopher Bollyn begins by discussing the artificiality of American politics and the control of the media by a small number of corporations. He highlights the lack of reporting on important issues such as the war in Syria and the excessive spending on the war on terror. Bollyn argues that the United States is in a predicament and that there is a need for people to understand that 9/11 was a hoax designed to initiate the war on terror. He emphasizes the importance of exposing this dual deception and bringing an end to the war.

    He argues that 9/11 was carried out to initiate the war on terror, which has resulted in the loss of millions of lives and trillions of borrowed dollars. The speaker emphasizes the importance of resisting this criminal war agenda, as failure to do so would be a betrayal to the nation. They also highlight that the government and media continue to lie about the events of 9/11, suggesting that they are controlled by the same people responsible for the attack.

    Christopher Bollyn then discusses the link between the 9/11 attacks, the war on terror, and the Zionist agenda. He argues that 9/11 was a false flag event designed to push forward the Zionist war agenda and establish Jewish supremacy. Bollyn presents evidence of the connections between individuals involved in the attacks and Israeli intelligence, highlighting the role of Richard Gutjahr and his high-level Israeli intelligence officer wife. He also mentions the meeting of Israeli Chief of Staff, Uhaul Eisen Mofaz, with prominent neoconservatives in the Pentagon. Bollyn further discusses the invasion of Afghanistan and the subsequent occupation of Iraq, which he claims were part of the bigger plan to destabilize and control the Middle East. Citing General Wesley Clark’s statements, Bollyn suggests that the ultimate goal was to target seven countries, with five of them already being accomplished. Overall, Bollyn argues that the war on terror was a means to fulfill an unknown plan driven by Zionism and Israeli interests.

    Christopher Bollyn goes on to discuss the Israeli plan to fragment Arab states in the Middle East, which was articulated in a paper published in 1982. This plan involves breaking up the states along ethnic and confessional lines, similar to what happened in Yugoslavia in the 1990s. Bollyn explains that Iraq, Syria, Libya, and Sudan have already been fragmented, and the ultimate goal is to establish Jewish military and economic hegemony over the entire Middle East. He highlights the complicity of the American government in this plan, citing a 1948 document written by the US Joint Chiefs of Staff that acknowledged Zionist objectives. Bollyn also mentions an email written by Hillary Clinton in 2012, where she states that using American force in Syria would help Israel. This, along with statements made by current Secretary of State John Kerry, suggests that the United States is actively involved in fragmenting and destroying countries like Syria for the benefit of Israel, and not out of any American interest.

    Christopher Bollyn then discusses the involvement of the US government in funding terrorist militias in Syria, which has fueled the ongoing war. He highlights the fact that many members of these militias wear ski masks to hide their faces, as they are paid mercenaries who have a future career to protect. Bollyn also points out a concerning incident involving Senator John McCain, who illegally entered Syria and met with leaders of a militia that the US was funding. He identifies one of the men McCain met with as Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, who later became the head of ISIS. Bollyn questions why McCain’s office provided an inadequate response when asked about the identity of the man in the black shirt seen in the photograph. Bollyn also sheds light on the questionable nature of the US war on terror, noting that terrorism has actually increased since 9/11 and is ten times greater in the countries where the US is fighting. He suggests that either the war on terror is counterproductive or there is another hidden agenda at play. Bollyn concludes by implicating Benjamin Netanyahu, the current Prime Minister of Israel, in the design and construction of the 9/11 attacks, along with other Jewish neocons in the Bush Administration, linking the evidential trail back to the Israeli government.

    Christopher Bollyn also discusses the connection between Ehud Barak and Benjamin Netanyahu, and how Barak made a public statement on the BBC World before the Twin Towers fell, blaming Osama bin Laden for the attack and calling for a war on terror. Bollyn points out that Barak was Netanyahu’s commander in an Israeli covert Commando force. He also highlights the false narrative presented by the New York Times after the attack, stating that hijacked jets destroyed the Twin Towers and hit the Pentagon, when in fact, there is evidence to suggest that drones were used and no large Boeing jet hit the Pentagon. Bollyn also mentions the ruthless actions of the Israeli state in the past, such as the attack on a US intelligence ship in 1967. He concludes by comparing the cover-up of 9/11 to the conspiracy surrounding the assassination of JFK and the immense cost of the fraudulent war on terror.

    Bollyn explains that the War on Terror is essentially an Israeli strategy, promoted by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu since 1979, to involve the US military and its allies in the Middle East to fight on behalf of Israel. Bollyn points out that Netanyahu wrote books on the topic, claiming that Islamic terrorists were attacking Israel because it was part of the West and therefore the West needed to fight this war. He argues that this is a deceptive way to delegitimize the Palestinian resistance to Israeli occupation. Bollyn also highlights Netanyahu’s statement after the 9/11 attacks, where he said that it would generate sympathy and be beneficial for Israel. Additionally, Bollyn discusses the close relationship between Netanyahu and Larry Silverstein, who owned the three buildings that collapsed on 9/11, and how Silverstein acquired the World Trade Center towers through a privatization scheme.

    The speaker also connects the war on terror to the Israeli stratagem and historical figures like Menachem Begin and David Ben-Gurion, who had aspirations for a larger Israel. He emphasizes the extreme nature of the current Israeli government and how acts of terrorism are used to scare people into supporting their aggressive Middle East war policy. The speaker concludes by mentioning the invasion of South Lebanon by Israel and their intention to establish a Christian state there.

    The speaker then discusses the actions of a radical Zionist group known as the Shamir group in the late 1940s, including the assassination of a United Nations mediator in Palestine. The group also played a role in the expulsion of Palestinians during the Israeli takeover after the United Nations partitioned Palestine. The speaker connects this history to the current mayor of Chicago, Rahm Emanuel, suggesting he has ties to the “Mohsad” (Mossad) and has been influential in American politics.

    The speaker then shifts to discuss the Israeli aviation of 9/11, highlighting a movie made in 1978 featuring a plane crashing into the Pan Am building and another movie made in 2000 featuring a plane crashing into the World Trade Center. These films, produced by Israeli agent Arnon Milchan, are presented as examples of predictive programming. The speaker also mentions Milchan’s involvement in a secret Israeli organization called Lakam, which was involved in smuggling nuclear components from America to Israel. Additionally, Benjamin Netanyahu’s role in the war on terror and the Netanyahu Institute on International Terrorism are discussed, along with a 1980 prediction made by the head of Mossad about terrorism coming to America, specifically New York City.

    Milchan and another agent, Avraham Shalom Bendor, tried to secure the security contract for the World Trade Center in 1987, but it was torn up when it was discovered that Bendor was a convicted murderer in Israel. However, they later went to work for Jules Kroll, a business partner of Maurice Greenberg, and their company, Kroll Associates, got the security contract for the World Trade Center after the 1993 bombing. It is also mentioned that the Israelis had prior knowledge of the 1983 bombing of the Beirut barracks but failed to share that information with the Americans. The section ends by discussing how the US, Saudi Arabia, Israel, and Pakistan cooperated to arm and train the mujahideen in Afghanistan, even supporting anti-western groups, in order to create a future enemy for the War on Terror.

    Christopher Bollyn then discusses the influence of a man named V Rafia, who used Charlie Wilson’s office as his own and had significant control over lobbying efforts. Bollyn goes on to explain how Arab fighters, known as Afghan Arabs, were trained by Israeli military intelligence, including Osama bin Laden. He mentions a man named Ali Muhammad, who trained bin Laden and set up a terrorist cell in Nairobi. Bollyn then connects the creation of Al-Qaeda and Taliban to the US, Saudi Arabia, and Israel in the early 1980s. He also mentions an article from Foreign Affairs magazine in 1998 that discussed the possibility of catastrophic terrorism coming to America. Bollyn points out that the authors of this report, including Philip Zelikow, went on to play prominent roles in the 9/11 Commission. He also highlights the Project for the New American Century, a group that predicted the need for US military engagement prior to 9/11.

    The speaker also discusses how terrorism has been used as a pretext for launching wars and justifying foreign policies. He mentions the 9/11 attacks as the catalyst for implementing long-standing plans and projects. The speaker also highlights the close relationship between Israeli intelligence and ISIS, claiming that the Israeli intelligence outfit, SITE, had access to ISIS beheading videos before they were released. Furthermore, he argues that there is a connection between the Clinton and Bush families through their involvement in the Iran-Contra scandal. The speaker suggests that politicians with a secret Vice or criminal history are often willing to do what they’re told to keep their secrets hidden. He concludes by discussing the fraudulent nature of some ISIS videos and how events like the Orlando shooting are used to draw Israel and the West closer together.

    He argues that the American public was duped into supporting the global war on terror through a combination of controlling the investigation, media interpretation, and litigation. The evidence was destroyed, and there was no criminal investigation into the attacks. The speaker also questions the integrity of key figures involved in the 9/11 Commission and their true motivations. He highlights several individuals who played a role in the cover-up, ultimately raising doubts about the official narrative of the events.

    He highlights the influence of figures like Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and media mogul Rupert Murdoch, who played a significant role in shaping public opinion through media ownership. The speaker also points out the involvement of powerful figures like Jacob Rothschild and Cheney Woolsey in the control of resources in places like Kurdistan and the Golan Heights. The speaker raises concerns about media consolidation and the lack of transparency surrounding events like the collapse of Building 7. Additionally, the speaker reveals a potential conflict of interest involving Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein, who oversaw the 9/11 tort litigation, suggesting that the legal proceedings were strategically settled out of court. Overall, the speaker suggests a dual-deception, where the narrative of 9/11 and the War on Terror is carefully controlled to serve specific interests.

    The speaker then discusses the involvement of the Mossad company Envy in airport security in Europe and their connection to the 9/11 attacks. The company ICTS, which was responsible for security at Boston, Newark, and Dulles airports on that day, was a defendant in the 9/11 Court litigation. However, the trial ended abruptly with the judge dismissing them as just the parent company. The speaker also mentions individuals involved in the litigation, such as Kenneth Feinberg and Sheila Birnbaum, both high-level Zionist players. They were responsible for distributing money to the families of 9/11 victims, and those who accepted the money had to sign non-disclosure agreements. The speaker highlights the connection between these individuals and their ties to Israel. The judge overseeing the litigation, Michael McCasey, is also mentioned, as he belonged to the same congregation as John Schallerstein, oversaw the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, and facilitated Larry Silverstein’s negotiations with the insurance company. The speaker suggests that the government and media are suppressing evidence that contradicts the official narrative of 9/11 in order to protect the true culprits. The speaker personally realized early on that the government’s story was a lie and began writing about it, eventually relocating to Europe. He shares conversations he had with former German intelligence chiefs who questioned the official narrative and pointed to Mossad as a possible culprit. However, their statements were not published in German magazines due to strict restrictions on discussing such matters in Germany.

    Christopher Bollyn also discusses the issue of deception and disinformation in the mainstream media. He explains that journalists often do not question the official version of events and those who do are labeled as crazy or fired from their jobs. Bollyn also highlights some anomalies of 9/11, such as the strange behavior of the hijackers and the peculiar characteristics of the planes that hit the Twin Towers. He suggests that there may have been a missile-like object fired before the plane hit the tower, possibly made of depleted uranium. Bollyn provides evidence of a burning object leaving a trail of dark oxides, which he believes could be a result of depleted uranium.

    When discussing the characteristics of the burning World Trade Center towers on 9/11, he suggests that an object, possibly a burning warhead, was used to create a superheated environment inside the towers, causing anything combustible to immediately burst into flames. Bollyn points out that there were peculiar explosions coming out of the entry wounds where the planes entered the buildings, which he believes could be indicative of thermite. He mentions that thermite produces white smoke and incredible heat when it burns. Bollyn also highlights the presence of molten iron and molybdenum in the dust from the World Trade Center, which cannot be explained by burning jet fuel or office fires, but can be attributed to thermite. He concludes that the government reports have ignored this evidence, suggesting a cover-up.

    Christopher Bollyn suggests a controlled demolition was responsible for the collapse of the World Trade Center on 9/11. He mentions the discovery of super thermite material in the dust, which is capable of releasing more energy per gram than any known explosive. The smoke from the burning pile contained nanoparticles that were extremely dangerous when inhaled, causing serious illnesses such as cancer and Parkinson’s disease. Additionally, molten steel was found beneath the rubble, even weeks after the attack. Bollyn also highlights the suspicious destruction of Building 6, where all the evidence for major crimes in the 1990s was stored. The night before the attack, the evidence was stolen from the vault in the basement and then the vault was bombed to cover up the theft. Bollyn raises questions about the Pentagon attack as well, pointing out the lack of visible evidence of a plane crash.

    Christopher Bollyn then discusses the inconsistencies and cover-ups surrounding the 9/11 Pentagon attack and the Shanksville crash. He questions how a small aluminum body plane could have penetrated the reinforced concrete wall of the Pentagon without damaging the columns in between. Bollyn also highlights the lack of evidence of a plane at the Shanksville site, with the debris field located elsewhere. He emphasizes the need to inform, organize, and take meaningful action to resist the fraudulent War on Terror, urging people to boycott Israeli products and engage in political activism. Bollyn quotes JFK to emphasize the importance of seeking genuine peace and building a better future for all.

    At the Q & A, the speaker is asked a personal question about Noam Chomsky and his stance on 9/11. The speaker believes that Chomsky has been an agent of manipulation and control, as his position on 9/11 contradicts the rest of his work. The speaker also mentions Alex Jones, another alternative voice in the media who avoids discussing Israeli involvement in 9/11. In response to the second question about video footage showing a plane wing entering a building, the speaker acknowledges that the video may be fraudulent, but maintains that planes did indeed strike the World Trade Center based on eyewitness accounts and the sound of the impact.

    Christopher Bollyn also reveals that many powerful figures in America, including the Bush family, have significant investments in war stocks. Companies like Halliburton, General Dynamics, and Northrop Grumman profited greatly from the war. Bollyn believes that while individuals like George Bush and Dick Cheney should be held accountable for treason and war crimes, it is important to recognize that the issue goes beyond them. He calls for a proper investigation that includes figures like Cheney, Bush, Sheratoff Ashcroft, and Ali Hupa to expose the full extent of their knowledge and involvement. Bollyn also addresses the Saudi connection, stating that while there is evidence of financial support from a Saudi royal family member, there is no proof of their involvement in the actual crime. He suggests that the Saudis have been manipulated to play the role of financiers, with the United States and Israel dictating their actions. Overall, Bollyn argues that the American government has become a “crimeocracy” run by criminals, and simply replacing one person with another will not bring about real change.

    The speaker also discusses the theory that the images and videos from 9/11 were pre-fabricated and that the witnesses were actors, suggesting that no real footage of the event exists. However, the speaker believes that these theories are “red herrings” and that the focus should be on the fact that thousands of people were killed and the world has changed as a result. The speaker argues that the US and Europe are now engaged in an open-ended war in the Middle East, with plans for more wars with Iran and Russia. They believe that this war agenda is orchestrated by Zionists. The solution proposed is to change the banking system and establish national banks that issue credit to the people on behalf of the state, in order to free nations from debt slavery. However, the speaker acknowledges that this would require a large popular movement to overthrow the current banking system.

    Christopher Bollyn then discusses the systemic corruption in the banking and financial system. He mentions that while there may be some smaller banks that are not in conspiracy with everyone, the overall system is rigged against the people. He also highlights the corruption within the U.S. government, where the president can declare war without Congress and the Federal Reserve controls the printing of money. Bollyn emphasizes the need to reorganize and rectify these situations in order to find solutions. He also touches upon the connection between the Arab Spring and the fraudulent war on terror, stating that the United States manipulated the Arab Spring to serve its own interests, as seen in Egypt and Syria. Bollyn expresses his frustration that these issues are not being discussed enough in America and that the media, controlled by a few corporations, keeps the public ignorant. He concludes by saying that the American people are starting to wake up but that there is still a long way to go.

    At the end, the speaker expresses their disappointment in the current state of the country and the political circus surrounding the Trump-Clinton rivalry. They argue that Americans need to wake up and take responsibility for their own future, instead of relying on one candidate to solve all their problems. The speaker emphasizes the importance of being informed and spreading awareness, as they believe that a revolution of awareness is necessary for real change. They mention various conspiracy theories, such as chemtrails, Fukushima, and 9/11, stating that these events were hoaxes designed to deceive and control the population. In conclusion, the speaker urges the audience to fight against the deception and lies that have enslaved them.

    YouTube Video

  • Israel Lied That al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza Was Being Used as Hamas Headquarters

    Israel Lied That al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza Was Being Used as Hamas Headquarters

    This video exposes Israel’s deceptive claim that al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza was being used as a headquarters for Hamas, justifying an attack on the hospital. The evidence presented by Israel was weak, yet it was supported by the US administration and propagandists, resulting in the hospital being repeatedly attacked and left without power. The speaker condemns these actions as war crimes and calls for accountability. They express disappointment at the lack of outrage for Palestinian lives and urge viewers to take action.

    Detailed Description

    In the video, Owen Jones highlights the Israeli Defense Forces’ (IDF) false claim that al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza was the main headquarters for Hamas freedom fighting activities, which was used to justify a devastating attack on the hospital. The IDF released a mocked-up video showcasing tunnels and meeting rooms allegedly belonging to Hamas within the hospital. However, foreign doctors, including Norwegian physician Mads Gilbert, vehemently denied these claims.

    Despite the lack of evidence, the US administration under President Joe Biden supported Israel’s narrative, lthough they called it a “node“, not the headquarters. As a result, the hospital was repeatedly attacked and left without power, leading to the deaths of doctors, nurses, patients, and premature babies.

    The IDF’s evidence, consisting of amateur footage and a dilapidated bathroom, failed to convince anyone of the hospital’s alleged role. Israel also refused demands for an independent investigation of the tunnels and ultimately destroyed them, preventing further scrutiny. This deception and subsequent war crimes committed by Israeli terrorists expose their disregard for civilian lives and international law.

    The Washington Post conducted an investigation and concluded that the evidence fell short of showing that Hamas had been using the hospital as a command and control center. The investigation did not find any immediate evidence of military use by Hamas in the hospital buildings or any connection to the tunnel network.

    Owen Jones emphasizes that targeting a hospital full of sick and dying patients was a grave war crime, and criticizes those who justified the assault on the hospital. He also mentions a column in the Washington Post that supported Israel’s claims, and criticizes commentators who moved the goalposts to justify the attack.

    The speaker asserts that these actions are war crimes, and calls for holding those who disseminated lies and propaganda accountable. He also expresses shock and disappointment at the lack of outrage towards Palestinian lives and the acceptance of depraved war crimes, stating that he will never view the world the same way again. He emphasizes the need to learn from this lesson and take action.

  • Amnesty International Calls Deliberate Attacks on Journalists by Israeli Militants War Crimes

    Amnesty International Calls Deliberate Attacks on Journalists by Israeli Militants War Crimes

    On October 13, 2023, as journalists from different news outlets were covering the conflict in Alma al-Shaab on the southern border of Lebanon, the Israeli militants launched a series of deliberate shelling attacks on the journalists, killing Issam Abdallah of Reuters and seriously wounding 6 others. Among the wounded are Christina Assi of AFP (Agence France-Presse) who lost her leg in the attack. Carmen Joukhadar and Elie Brakhia reporting for Al Jazeera, Dylan Collins with AFP, Thaer Al-Sudani and Maher Nazeh with Reuters were also wounded.

    The footage from the attack was analyzed by the Amnesty Intentional and revealed that the journalists were marked as PRESS and their car had TV plastered on top of it, suggesting the attack was a violation of international law. AI called the attack by Israel a war crime and calls for an investigation to bring accountability and justice for the victims and their families.

    The video discusses the importance of journalists documenting events and collecting evidence to piece together what is happening. The affected journalists describe how seeing their friend and colleague die only strengthened their resolve to speak up for those whose voices have been silenced by Israel. They ultimately believe that this experience has made them even more committed to his field.

    So far, 63 other journalists have been killed by Israeli militants in Gaza to stop the truth from coming out.

  • How Mainstream Press Would Report Israeli Crimes Against America

    How Mainstream Press Would Report Israeli Crimes Against America

    This parody video accuses Hamas of committing heinous crimes against the United States of America, which were in fact committed by Israel. This is how mainstream press would twist the stories. Replace the instances of “Hamas” with “Israel” and vice versa, and you’ll get the truth.

    Some of the worst crimes discussed include the bombing of USS Liberty in 1967, which resulted in the death of 34 American sailors and 171 injuries, and the Lavon Affair in 1954, where Hamas terrorists attempted to pin blame for an explosion on Israeli terrorists.

    Other crimes mentioned are the theft of Highly Enriched Uranium for a nuclear weapons program and the 9/11 attacks, where Hamas agents were found celebrating the destruction of the Twin Towers. The speaker also discusses a pedophilia ring run by Hamas agent Jafar al-Epstain. He concludes by urging listeners to care about Israel and sign up for the US military.

  • Interview with Ronald Bernard – Former Dutch Banker Working for Elites of This World

    Interview with Ronald Bernard – Former Dutch Banker Working for Elites of This World

    In this interview, Ronald Bernard, a former Dutch banker, exposes the elite’s involvement in the global financial system. He discusses how the elite has stolen the real value of money, leading to national debts and inflation. He claims that the interest rate at the top of the pyramid is added to the capital, and the rules, laws, and organizations ensure that the bottom layer stays in place to avoid the wealthy becoming overpowered.

    Bernard highlights how the elite uses gas prices and inflation as their primary methods for depleting the masses’ purchasing power and extracting their value. Additionally, he discusses the European Central Bank’s role in creating new money every month to increase inflation and steal value from the population. Bernard calls out the elite for their deceptive and exploitative methods in the financial and economic systems.

    Later, Ronald Bernard talks about the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) and its role in the financial crisis, arguing that it has not been used as intended but rather by banks for their own gain. He then talks about the lack of change in the current political system, calling it a puppet system where individuals start working for the higher powers once in a coalition, rather than the people.

    He also discusses his experience with becoming a social entrepreneur after going through trauma processing and his involvement in an inner circle of a religion that involves organ trafficking and child exploitation. He talks about the difficulty faced in disclosing these iniquities and the need to continue challenging unjust practices in the world.

    Detailed Description

    In the interview, which is in Dutch but dubbed over in English, Ronald Bernard talks about his background and experiences in the financial sector. He has always been an entrepreneur at heart and enjoys the independence it provides. While working in import/export, he encountered different currencies and had to trade through brokers, and his broker suggested he consider making more money through the financial world by trading in assets to make money from differences in interest rates. He agreed and took over the broker’s spot but asked for a commission. The broker warned him that it came at a great cost and that he couldn’t do it with a clear conscience. However, Bernard was already used to putting his conscience in the “freezer” as a survival mechanism due to his difficult upbringing.

    He goes on to discuss his experience working in the financial world and the small, circular nature of the global flows of money. He explains that banks and other financial institutions use certain financial constructions and international legislation to move money in a way that makes everything appear to be legitimate to supervisors and regulatory bodies worldwide. He also talks about his role in changing currencies and the use of money in the retail market. He uses the example of the Iraqi dinar, which was backed by oil and had value officially, to illustrate the importance of understanding the relationship between money and oil in global trade.

    When exposing the elite’s involvement in money laundering and how they manipulate society through rules and regulations, Ronald Bernard recounts his experience working as a banker in Germany and their task of processing cash in such a way that it can be legally reintroduced into the money circulation. Bernard revealed that the bank is filled to maximum capacity with dollars and needed to be emptied to make way for German marks. Bernard also highlights how Iraq’s representatives wanted to remain free from accusations and were all friends on the same side, despite appearances to the contrary. Bernard’s job was to process the cash without being detected, and he had to have nerves of steel to do so. He played at the highest level for about five years but eventually gave up, seeing it as an intense moment in his life.

    Ronald Bernard then discusses his experience working in the financial world and the knowledge he gained about the real world through his clients, which included banks, governments, multinationals, and even terrorist organizations. He talks about the connections he saw between these groups and the flows of money that went from one place to another. Bernard also discusses the role of secret services and how they are involved in the financing of walls, creating conflict and misery in the world. He reflects on the realization that the entire world as we know it is just an illusion, something he learned through his work in the financial world. Despite this knowledge, he acknowledges that there were things happening in his life that he did not expect, such as his freezer malfunctioning. Overall, Bernard describes the financial world as complex and full of hidden truths, and his experiences within it as eye-opening.

    He also discusses his involvement in massive dumping of currency which reduced the value of Italian businesses and caused them to go bankrupt. He talks about a successful deal with the Italian lira and how it resulted in the company going bankrupt. He then shares his own personal experience with volunteering with a religious group that played with dark and demonic imagery, including Satanism. He acknowledges the fact that some people take these things seriously and that it can be difficult to speak about due to his conscience not being perfectly aligned with these circle’s beliefs.

    Ronald Bernard goes on to talk about how he came to refuse assignments and became suspicious of the world around him. He mentions blackmailing and the use of mind-control in politics and business, and discusses how he studied theology and psychology to make sense of what he was experiencing. He also mentions the Protocols of Zion and recommends that everyone read and study the document.

    The use of fear and deception to control humanity is also discussed, and then he talks about the luciferian entity and how it wants to divide humanity based on politics, skin color, and religion, in order to weaken them. Bernard highlights the importance of standing up for ourselves and our beliefs in order to overcome this entity and its agenda. He encourages his listeners to open their eyes to the true creation, one that is based on love and unity. Bernard also discusses the concept of a powerful being that can appear with just a little light, and that can help us overcome a long period of darkness.

    After that, he discusses his near-death experience and the intense experience he had upon his departure from the world of banking. He acknowledges that he has seen how the elite were working on him and talks about the physical and emotional torture he experienced. He also talks about the realization that he is not just his body but a vessel in the physical world. He mentions that his end of the first life was so extreme that he could not handle it any longer, but his mind power was so strong that it only happened to his own body. He also talks about how he had wished to take drugs and alcohol to make his end gentler, but we know that most colleagues in the banking world are already dead by now. He then talks about the pyramid-shaped financial system used by the elite to control the world’s money and banks. The pyramid-shaped financial system, headquartered in Switzerland and Belgium, has a system that starts at the top with eight thousand eight or five hundred people giving orders, and the mechanism is a pyramid-shaped system that propagates downward to be executed.

    He goes into detail discussing the Basel Institute for Banking Supervision (BIS) and its role in the global financial system. The BIS, originating from the Netherlands in 1930, is recognized worldwide as the headquarters of the financial world, with every central bank being a member of this civil organization. The headquarters agreement describes the BIS’s range of power, authorization, level of operations, and output. The BIS has complete immunity from everything on earth, including its own police service, making it a fully recognized immune state beyond the grasp of any rules. The speaker also discusses the BIS’s role during World War I, where it facilitated the trading of gold between enemies. The BIS also calculates the amount needed for countries to ensure they will never be able to pay off their debts, enabling them to increase their grip on countries or continents.

    The speaker then talks about the city of London as a financial hub and a player in the global financial system. He mentions the concept of a free state, where institutions like Vatican City, Washington DC, and the BIS in Basel are immune from regulation and do not answer to anyone. The speaker goes on to explain how money is created based on debt in an economy, and how the interest rate is used as one of the mechanisms to regulate credit and control the financial pyramid. The speaker argues that the continuous stream of debt and interest rates causes a global shortage and contributes to the global misery experienced by people in society.

    Ronald Bernard then discusses how the elite has stolen the real value of money, leading to national debts and inflation. He claims that the interest rate at the top of the pyramid is added to the capital, and the rules, laws, and organizations ensure that the bottom layer stays in place to avoid the wealthy becoming overpowered. Bernard highlights how the elite uses gas prices and inflation as their primary methods for depleting the masses’ purchasing power and extracting their value. Additionally, he discusses the European Central Bank’s role in creating new money every month to increase inflation and steal value from the population. Bernard calls out the elite for their deceptive and exploitative methods in the financial and economic systems.

    As an informer, he says calculations by economists show that 80% of people pay interest throughout their lives while only 10% receive it and another 10% pay out interest to the system. Additionally, the informer highlights the historical background of interest rates being illegal and punishable by death, but it is now common in Islamic banking, despite the legalization of interest being against Islamic morality. The informer also takes issue with private banks’ influence in the financial system, which he argues has no oversight and is not accountable to the public. Finally, the informer discusses the European Stability Mechanism, an institute created by a vote from the House of Representatives in 2012, and notes that it is a protected, free state with employees receiving indemnification and immunity.

    He explains that the ESM mechanism is designed to ensure that any required amount of money, ranging from 10 billion to 100 billion euros, is delivered by the Netherlands within seven days. However, the speaker argues that most of the money sent through the ESM is not reaching the intended recipient countries but is instead being used by banks for their own gain. The speaker uses the example of Greece as an illustration, noting that a lot of money has been sent through the ESM but only a small percentage has reached Greece. Instead, he argues that the money is being channeled through Germany, France, and the Netherlands to its own banks. The speaker notes that the rich are getting richer as a result, while the poor are getting poorer. The speaker also talks about the role of multinationals and pharmaceutical companies in the financial crisis. He argues that these companies are profiting from the financial crisis and that their immunity is allowing them to get away with anything. He describes this as the world’s biggest villains’ dream come true. Overall, the speaker argues that the financial crisis is a result of a system that has been designed to favor the wealthy and powerful at the expense of the poor. He calls on people to become aware of this system and to take action to bring about change.

    Ronald Bernard then discusses the current political system and the lack of change in the last 40 years, particularly in political topics such as healthcare and the economy. Bernard notes that political parties are filled with people who are dedicated to their principles and desire to make a change, but once a coalition is formed, they immediately start working for the higher powers rather than the people. Bernard calls these individuals “puppets” and argues that they are responsible for manipulating the media to keep their actions hidden from the public. Bernard mentions several examples of small groups of people who have made it onto political stages but receive little attention from the mainstream media or are otherwise ignored. He believes that the movement of the people is needed to bring about real change to the system.

    When discussing his experience with becoming a social entrepreneur after going through trauma processing, he talks about the negative mentality of the Dutch society and how they often break down success that is essential for humanity. Bernard believes that getting clean inside and becoming strong through drama processing is the key to overcoming this negativity and to successfully realizing manifestations. He also mentions the tremendous impact his interview has had worldwide, with over 18 million people watching it, and the current power structure of the financial system being exposed. However, Bernard acknowledges that his focus was initially on himself and his creation, and he did not expect the interview to have such a widespread impact.

    In his own words, Ronald Bernard started an initiative in the past, but the fear and lack of trust made it difficult for him to succeed. He mentioned the Protocols of Zion, which he believes are a matter of conscious control and were written in ancient texts. Bernard also talked about how people around the world are praying for teams to support him and his work, while others try to prove that he is a liar. He admits that there are a lot of people who try to use his past as an argument to discredit him, but he believes that what he is doing is important. He also mentions that the fear of change is what keeps people from realizing the truth and that many people are afraid of the truth coming out.

    Eventually, Ronald Bernard discusses his involvement in an inner circle of a religion that he believes to be sick and involves organ trafficking and child exploitation. He talks about how he ended up in the inner circle through an invitation from a colleague and how it was initially supposed to be another type of event, but the truth about it was shocking. He also talks about how children organs are taken from the burnout nurses in India, and no one is talking or taking action about it.

    This organized trafficking and child abuse he sis operate on a large scale, including cases where perpetrators are acquitted despite evidence of their crimes. He claims that children are damaged from an early age and that allowing such behavior contributes to a sick world and impending war. Bernard urges people to wake up and take responsibility for their actions. He has personally experienced child abuse and has committed himself to protecting the children and making a positive change in the world.

    Ronald Bernard emphasizes that his and his family’s privacy are important to them, and that they do not share everything about themselves on the internet. He then talks about the theme of a curriculum vitae (CV) in the Netherlands and how he has not wished to write one about his past life because everything he did in official companies had a deeper layer to it. He also notes that getting a seat on the stock exchange was not just a coincidence but rather a result of many years of being busy and active as an entrepreneur.

    He explains that people in circles of power are unlikely to come forward or testify about wrongdoings, especially if it may damage their relationships or reputations. He notes that he has personally recovered from trauma experienced during his time as an insider in the banking industry, despite facing challenges in receiving validation and support for his claims. He highlights the specific challenges of trying to reveal information worldwide, and the many people who may not believe his testimony. Despite these challenges, Bernard notes his determination to continue challenging unjust practices and the need to protect children and demand accountability.

    Ronald Bernard concludes the three part interview by speaking about the connection between trade and human trafficking, specifically child labor. He emphasizes the tragic consequences of these practices, with an estimated 17,000 children dying every day from hunger and thirst. Bernard highlights the need for individuals to take action and stand up against these injustices, stating that more and more people are becoming aware and taking action. He believes that this movement could lead to meaningful change in the world.

  • UN Security Council Briefed on Nord Stream Pipeline Sabotage by Dirk Pohlmann and Jimmy Dore

    UN Security Council Briefed on Nord Stream Pipeline Sabotage by Dirk Pohlmann and Jimmy Dore

    Dirk Pohlmann (German journalist, author, screenwriter, director and producer) and Jimmy Dore (American stand-up comedian, political commentator and theorist) recently briefed the United Nations Security Council about the 2022 Nord Stream pipeline sabotage.

    Pohlmann presented new evidence suggesting that the operation would have required professional or military divers and a large-scale deployment of explosives, making it unlikely to have been carried out by a small sailing boat. He also raised suspicions about the Bops 20t exercise, which took place around the same time as the sabotage, and suggested that it may have provided a cover for the deployment of the bombs.

    Dore highlighted the alleged involvement of the United States in the sabotage, pointing to evidence that US Navy divers planted explosives and high-ranking US officials expressed satisfaction with the attack. The speakers emphasized the need for an independent and objective investigation to reveal the truth behind the sabotage and hold the perpetrators accountable. Representatives from other countries echoed these concerns and urged transparent and timely disclosure of the investigation results.

    UN Brief by Dirk Pohlmann

    Mr. Dirk Pohlmann, an investigative journalist and documentary filmmaker, is the first to address the United Nations Security Council about the 2022 Nord Stream pipeline sabotage. He discusses how little information is known about the sabotage, including the number of explosions and the identity of the perpetrators. Pohlmann presents new evidence, including the opinions of Professor Dr. Tanda and the seismic data from a Norwegian seismological station, suggesting that the operation would have required professional or military divers and a large-scale deployment of explosives, making it unlikely to have been carried out by a small sailing boat. He also raises suspicions about the Bops 20t exercise, which took place around the same time as the sabotage, and suggests that it may have provided a cover for the deployment of the bombs.

    Dirk Pohlmann makes the claim that the USS Kar 257 M and US Gunon Hall 150 190 M, both small aircraft carriers, could have been used to deploy explosives for sabotaging the Nord Stream pipeline. It is suggested that US Navy divers with deep diving equipment from Panama City, Florida might have been involved in deploying the bombs. Furthermore, it is alleged that a US Poseidon aircraft dropped a sonobuoy that triggered the timers of the bombs. While there is speculation that the Norwegians were supposed to drop the sonobuoy, evidence suggests that a US Hercules aircraft flew to Norway to fetch a specific sonobuoy and bring it to Sigonella.

    Additionally, there are discrepancies in the official reports about the amount of explosives used, with a Swiss physicist, Dr. Hans Benjamin Brown, suggesting that the physical evidence points towards the use of an explosive charge at least a thousand times larger than what has been reported. These details were presented in a detailed report to the Swiss government and shared with the United Nations.

    Dirk Pohlmann then discusses the contradictions and inconsistencies in the official reports regarding the magnitude and nature of the explosive charge used in the sabotage of Nord Stream 1. The reports initially stated that the explosion had a magnitude of 2.1 on the Richter scale, corresponding to approximately 700 kilograms of TNT equivalent. However, further analysis suggests that the magnitude was actually 3.1, indicating a much larger explosive charge of roughly 25 tons of TNT equivalent.

    Dirk Pohlmann also points out that the location of the explosion was strategically chosen to generate a shock wave directed at Kaliningrad, raising doubts about the nature of the explosive charge used. The observations and independent geophysical findings strongly contradict the reported use of a small conventional explosive, suggesting a much larger explosive charge of 1 to 4 kilotons TNT equivalent.

    At the second half of his speech, Dirk Pohlmann highlights the importance of securing independent and objective evidence through the authority of the UN Security Council, as it is crucial to address the seriousness of the matter. The Baltic seabed’s abundance of hydrates can be identified by Western navies, making it possible to determine if a ship, such as the Andromeda allegedly used at the sabotage site, was present.

    Historical examples of Western intelligence operations targeting Soviet pipelines are mentioned, including the killing of Italian oil manager Enrico Mattei and the destruction of the Mal Pipeline by the CIA.

    The briefing also mentions the political dynamics surrounding the Nord Stream pipeline, with the US having no allies but hostages and certain governments suffering from Stockholm syndrome.

    UN Brief by Jimmy Dore

    Jimmy Dore also discusses the attack on the Nord Stream pipeline, highlighting it as the biggest act of industrial sabotage in human history and pointing out that President Joe Biden himself stated his intentions to attack the Nord Stream 2 pipeline.

    According to investigative reporter Seymour Hersh, US Navy divers planted explosives in June 2022, which later destroyed three of the four pipelines. High-ranking US officials, including Under Secretary of State Victoria Nuland and Secretary of State Anthony Blinken, expressed satisfaction with the attack, claiming it was an opportunity to diminish reliance on Russian energy.

    Jimmy Dore argues that the Western media’s coverage of the conflict in Ukraine conveniently leaves out key events, such as the 2014 coup orchestrated by the US and Ukraine Nazis, which contributes to a false understanding of the conflict.

    He mentions the involvement of a Nazi Azov Battalion and the violation of a peace agreement by the Ukrainian government. The speaker also emphasizes the expansion of NATO onto Russia’s border as a primary cause of the tensions. It is argued that the United States’ imperialistic ambitions and fear of German-Russian collaboration drive its aggression. Jimmy Dore criticizes the US and its NATO allies for their silence on the environmental impact of the war, particularly the release of methane gas. Furthermore, he mentions Greta Thunberg’s visit to Ukraine following the Nord Stream bombing.

    Remarks from International Representatives

    The inconsistencies in the narrative promoted by Washington and its allies regarding the bombing of the Nord Stream gas pipelines in September 2022 are then discussed by the representative of the Russian Federation. Despite claims that national investigations are underway, no results have been produced thus far. The speaker suggests that more evidence is emerging in the expert community indicating that the explosion was the work of Washington. He argues that this act of sabotage was committed to consolidate dominance in Europe, ignoring the dire need for Russian energy resources.

    The lack of progress in the investigations conducted by Germany, Denmark, and Sweden are then highlighted, and questions the effectiveness of these national efforts. He proposes the establishment of an independent international commission to investigate the act of sabotage and emphasizes that this incident was not a prank but a terrorist act with significant economic and environmental consequences for multiple states. He argues that the actions taken fall under the International Convention for the Suppression of Terrorist Bombings.

    Despite German Chancellor Olaf Schulz’s intention to resolve the matter, there is a lack of relevant information and attempts to conceal the truth. Various ridiculous versions of events have been spread to divert attention from the involvement of Western powers.

    Russian representative references an investigation by journalist Seymour Hirsch, which suggests that American divers planted explosives during NATO exercises. There are also mentions of statements from President Biden, Deputy Secretary of State Victoria Nuland, and former Polish Foreign Minister Radosław Sikorski expressing opposition to Nord Stream. The involvement of Germany, Denmark, and Sweden is seen as a cover-up to protect their overseas allies.

    He calls for accountability and justice for the perpetrators and proposes a draft presidential statement for consideration by the Security Council. The speaker emphasizes the importance of preventing such crimes and avoiding impunity.

    Following the speech by the Russian representative, the representative of Japan lso expresses concern about the incident and acknowledges the environmental implications it may have.

    Representatives from Brazil, Gabon, and Ecuador then address the United Nations regarding the Nord Stream pipeline explosions and the need for transparent and timely disclosure of the investigation results. They emphasize the economic losses, environmental impacts, and threats to international peace and security caused by the sabotage. Expressing support for the national authorities conducting the investigations, they urge cooperation, information exchange, and the avoidance of hindrances or opacity in order to reveal the truth behind the incidents.

    Representatives from Switzerland, and China also address the United Nations about the sabotage of the Nord Stream 1 and 2 pipelines in the Baltic Sea. They condemn the acts of sabotage, highlighting the environmental impact and the potential for heightened tensions and unpredictable consequences. The representatives call for objective and thorough investigations to determine the truth and express concern about the delays in reaching conclusive results. They emphasize the importance of upholding the rule of law and avoiding disruptive actions that hinder the search for truth. China calls for active communication and cooperation with Russia and warns against attempting to politicize the investigation, emphasizing the need for objective and authoritative conclusions.

    Finally, representatives from Malta, and the United Kingdom address the concerns of the international community regarding the sabotage of the Nord Stream pipelines. Malta strongly condemns the sabotage and highlights the threats posed to energy security and regional stability. They express confidence in ongoing investigations and reject claims that sufficient time has not been given to establish the truth. The United Kingdom thanks the briefers for their perspectives but the video ends as the representative begins his speech.

    Video

  • Interview with Captain Dan Hanley – Airline Pilot and 9/11 Whistleblower

    Interview with Captain Dan Hanley – Airline Pilot and 9/11 Whistleblower

    Captain Dan Hanley, a former commercial airline pilot and aviation whistleblower, spoke on The Michael Decon Program about the corruption and safety concerns present in the airline industry, particularly in regards to the events of 9/11.

    Hanley founded the website 911 Pilot Whistleblowers to expose the fact that the 9/11 planes were remotely controlled, and that neither the hijackers nor experienced pilots could have flown the flight profiles at the given speed and altitude.

    Hanley also discussed his personal experience, including being illegally terminated by United Airlines for speaking out about safety issues and the grounding of pilots who are whistleblowers.

    Additionally, Hanley shared skepticism about historical events and a belief that the government and media have misled and manipulated the public.

    When speaking about the damage done to the Pentagon, Hanley provided evidence that a 757 plane struck the building and described the off-body parts and identifiable passengers found as proof of a plane crash.

    Hanley also expressed his belief that a group of powerful people, including Mossad, CIA, MI6 and the Rothschild cabal, were behind the attacks.

    He discussed his experiences as a federal whistleblower and the lack of response he received from relevant government agencies when he attempted to bring forth evidence.

    Hanley encouraged individuals to speak out until justice is served and provided tips on what to do in case of a nuclear explosion.

    00:05:00

    Captain Dan Hanley, a former commercial airline pilot, received a plethora of certifications and flew different aircraft in his 35-year career. He shared his experience flying for the Navy during the Cold War and his tenure at United Airlines. However, his career ended due to his vocal opinions on the safety and security implications of the 9/11 events, and he was illegally terminated. In this section, Captain Hanley emphasizes that he, as an experienced aircraft pilot, could not have flown the 9/11 flight profiles at the given speed and altitude, especially the Pentagon profile, and neither could the alleged hijackers.

    00:10:00

    In this section, Captain Dan Hanley, who worked as an airline pilot, talks about his six-year fight with the US government AFAA and airline to expose the corruption in the industry. Despite evidence and witnesses, his case was dismissed. He founded a website called 911 Pilot Whistleblowers and serves as its Director and international public spokesperson. The website focuses on efforts to put a stop to the corruption that was prevalent in the airline industry, especially during the time of the 9/11 attacks. Hanley explains his personal experience during the tragedy and mentions that the website aims to shed light on the events of 9/11.

    00:15:00

    In this section, Captain Dan Hanley explains that the main purpose of the 911 Pilots organization is to demonstrate that the planes used in the attack were remotely controlled through a system called the uninterrupted autopilot. According to Hanley, this system allows a remote source to take complete control of the aircraft autopilot and flight management computer, and fly it to its target. Hanley has been trying to recruit active and retired pilots to attest to the fact that neither the hijackers nor they themselves could have flown the 9/11 flight profile. Hanley cites the example of the Pentagon profile flown by a 29-year-old Saudi Arabian hijacker named Hani Hanjour, who was a poor student and could barely speak English, and the maneuver he made in his first attempt was nearly impossible even for experienced pilots. Hanley suspects that there might be more to the story behind the alleged hijackers.

    00:20:00

    In this section of the interview, Captain Dan Hanley discusses the suspicious activities of one of the 9/11 hijackers, Hani Hanjour, prior to the attacks. Hanjour attempted to rent a single-engine airplane but was found to be an incompetent pilot by instructors who evaluated him. Despite this, Hanjour was later able to skillfully maneuver a commercial airliner during the attacks. Hanley believes that this evidence has been covered up by the FBI and the 9/11 Commission, and shares his attempts to track down witnesses and present this information to the government.

    00:25:00

    In this section, Captain Dan Hanley discusses the lack of a criminal investigation into the 9/11 attacks and the failures of the 9/11 commission to address the questions and concerns of the victims’ families. He explains that the commission was underfunded, time-constrained, and set up to fail, with the executive director having the final report outlined before the commission began their work. Additionally, no pilots were allowed to testify before the commission regarding the absurd assertion that the terrorists were able to fly the planes into the World Trade Center towers. Hanley also shares his experience of being grounded permanently by the FAA under the guise of being mentally unstable after speaking out about safety and security concerns in the airline industry.

    00:30:00

    In this section of the interview, Captain Dan Hanley discusses his efforts to raise safety concerns with his employer, United Airlines, and the union that represented him. Despite following Federal Aviation Administration regulations and submitting multiple reports to his employer and union, he was stonewalled and eventually grounded for “psychological” reasons. When he sought legal advice from mental health professionals, he was advised to undergo psychological evaluations to protect himself and ensure that he was fit to fly, but United Airlines used the results of these evaluations to further justify their decision to ground him.

    00:35:00

    In this section, Captain Dan Hanley discusses how he was told to submit to the Employee Assistance Program after an incident with a flight attendant, which was endorsed by the company, union, and FAA. After flying to Chicago and meeting with a flight surgeon, he was taken to a mental health facility without realizing it and was diagnosed with bipolar disorder by a psychologist who had no knowledge of aviation. Despite having evidence and recorded conversations, he was ignored by the government after trying to report the situation and ultimately went through a tough experience that impacted his wife and children.

    00:40:00

    In this section of the interview, Captain Dan Hanley discusses how whistleblowers in the airline industry are treated by the government and how it affects their families. He shares his story of losing his 27-year marriage and two children who blame him for the divorce. Hanley is no longer a U.S citizen because of what he experienced as a whistleblower. He is now part of the Whistleblowing Airline Pilots Association, a grassroots organization that aims to expose the wrongful process of eliminating whistleblowing pilots in the industry. Hanley had lost his 35-year career and reputation as a pilot, while his children were the ultimate cost.

    00:45:00

    In this section, Captain Dan Hanley and Michael Decon discuss the patriotism that was pumped up after 9/11, even though it was a façade and the government deluded people with false patriotism. Furthermore, the media worked with the government to instigate patriotism, and we have witnessed this again, even with the recent COVID pandemic. Hanley asserts that the CIA exists not to solve problems but to create them, and this is evident in their involvement in JFK’s assassination, their lies about weapons of mass destruction, and their use of hijackers as their assets. Hanley believes that various groups, such as the Bilderberg, the Rothschild Cabal, and the 13 Bloodlines, collaborated for years to plan 9/11. Additionally, he questions American gullibility from historical events such as Pearl Harbor.

    00:50:00

    In this section of the interview, Captain Dan Hanley discusses his skepticism of various historical events, including the Kennedy assassination, the Gulf of Tonkin incident, Operation Paperclip, and the official narrative of the 9/11 attacks. Hanley shares his belief that 9/11 and other events were a test of global gullibility and that the media is complicit in propagating false narratives. He also mentions a book by a physics professor from the University of Punjab who claims that bin Laden died in 2005 and was fired and thrown in jail when he spoke publicly about it. A caller also shares their experience of being told not to take a mental test by their union and a mechanic’s belief that they installed a box in the plane that crashed.

    00:55:00

    In this section, Captain Dan Hanley is interviewed on The Michael Decon Program about the existence of an autopilot system that could have taken control of the airplane during the 9/11 attacks. An avionics technician named Wayne Anderson saw this system in operation back in 1996 on a Boeing 757 and had given an interview after which he was chastised by McDonald Douglas. The system has existed in some form since 1944 and is derived from cruise missile technology. Captain Hanley and the caller on the show agree that it would have been impossible for the hijackers to navigate and control the planes manually. The accuracy of navigation systems on modern commercial jet aircraft is such that when the weather is below a certain visibility, pilots are required to Auto Land the airplane, where it tracks the center line of the runway until the Pilot disconnects the autopilot.

    01:00:00

    In this section, Captain Dan Hanley and Michael Decon discuss the controversy surrounding what hit the Pentagon on 9/11. The argument has been whether it was a missile or American 77, or if an airplane was even involved at all. Hanley shares that there were 99 pilot whistleblowers who couldn’t have flown the plane, but he also acknowledges that many different theories exist. The FBI won’t release the camera footage around the site, which adds to the issue. They also address the fact that there are many people online who try to discredit those who question the official narrative, and that some of these individuals have been paid to do so.

    01:05:00

    In this section of the interview, the hosts and callers discuss the negative actions of the CIA and FBI, with one caller highlighting the Waco incident and Oklahoma City bombing as examples. Another caller references a Wikipedia page detailing the technology available in 1984 that allowed for remote control aircraft navigation and compares it to the advanced technology today. The hosts express the importance of educating oneself on these topics and encourage callers to share their opinions and be a part of the program.

    01:10:00

    In this section of the interview, a caller discusses his experience of witnessing the events of 9/11 in a sports bar in New Zealand and the disbelief and anger that followed. He talks about the hostile times where people were not allowed to speak against the narrative that was being pushed and how this lack of discourse allowed the official narrative to persist. They also discuss the self-censorship that is present in American culture and how it has been a factor in the ability to speak out against the narrative. Finally, they touch upon the idea that this incident was part of a larger plan that had been in the works for many years and the difficulty in discussing this narrative because of the perceived association with anti-Semitism.

    01:15:00

    In this section, the caller expresses their belief that Israelis have no business making laws in the United States and criticizes his family members who refuse to question the official narrative of 9/11. He recounts how he has been visited by the FBI several times but takes pleasure in cracking jokes with them. Later, another caller joins the show, identifying himself as being with Scientists for 9/11 Truth, and claims that there is evidence of a 757 hitting the Pentagon on 9/11.

    01:20:00

    In this section, Captain Dan Hanley was interviewed live on The Michael Decon Program. They discussed the evidence of what happened at the Pentagon during 9/11. There was a lot of misinformation about the Pentagon, with many people believing there was some sort of missile or farce happening, but the evidence shows a 757 plane caused the damage. Photos show all the damage on the first floor and the extent of the impact damage on the outside. There were videos taken that recorded the plane crossing the lawn and evidence of the right and left wingtips and engines. The recovery of the off-body parts and identification of all the actual passengers provide compelling evidence of what happened.

    01:25:00

    In this section, Captain Dan Hanley is being interviewed about his belief that a plane struck the Pentagon on 9/11, not a missile. He mentions the hate mail he receives and that his stance has been thoroughly researched. Hanley goes on to discuss his belief that it was a group of powerful people, including Mossad CIA MI6, who were behind the events of 9/11, and that the Rothschild cabal and the creation of the nation state of Israel were part of the motivation for the attacks. He also mentions that his experiences with 9/11 caused him to become interested in conspiracy theories and seeking the truth, which has become a lifelong pursuit.

    01:30:00

    In this section of the interview, Captain Dan Hanley discusses his belief that the military-industrial complex benefitted from the 6.2 trillion dollar expenditure since 9/11. He also mentions insider trading that occurred before the events of 9/11 and how it is a clear sign of a false flag. Hanley encourages people to visit 911pilot.org to read interviews with pilots around the world who all believe that the official narrative could not have been true. He also shares his experience with trying to report information concerning the crime to various government agencies, but ultimately being stonewalled for 30 months.

    01:35:00

    In this section, Captain Dan Hanley discusses his experiences with federal whistleblower cases and the lack of response he received when attempting to bring forth evidence to relevant government agencies. He shares the story of the Lawyers Committee for 9/11 Inquiry, who presented 57 evidence packages to a U.S attorney in New York, which led to the announcement of a grand jury investigation into their allegations. However, the Department of Justice, the FBI, and the National Institute of Standards and Technology blocked their evidence, and the grand jury was prevented from moving forward. Hanley talks about how they have exhausted all political and legal avenues in the United States and are now trying to reach out to the International Community to investigate the 9/11 crime.

    01:40:00

    In this section, Captain Dan Hanley emphasizes the importance of continuing to speak out about 9/11 until justice is served. He expresses optimism that the truth will eventually come to light with the power of information exchange in the information age. He also provides his social media information for those who want to follow his vocal opinions on the topic. The segment ends with a clip from a 2001 interview with Donald Trump about 9/11, where he suggests that the towers may have been brought down by bombs in addition to the planes. The host encourages listeners to keep speaking out and never stay silent about these important issues.

    01:45:00

    In this section, Captain Dan Hanley provides tips on what to do in case of a nuclear explosion, advising individuals to get inside a building and move away from windows. He goes on to suggest staying inside, shutting all doors and windows, and having a basement or getting as far into the middle of the building as possible. If one was outside after the blast, he recommends getting clean immediately, removing and bagging all outer clothing to avoid radioactive dust or ash away from the body. Finally, he advises staying tuned, following media for more information, and not stepping outside until officials say it’s safe.

    YouTube Video

  • Use of Thermate in Demolition of WTC Buildings on 9/11

    Use of Thermate in Demolition of WTC Buildings on 9/11

    The Great Thermate Debate challenges the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s theory that molten metal pouring from the World Trade Center towers was mixed with partially burned solid organic materials and caused the yellow-red color.

    Independent scientists suggest that some kind of thermite material could have been part of the towers and present direct video evidence, eyewitness accounts, forensic evidence, photographic evidence, and tangible evidence of temperatures high enough to melt steel.

    The possibility of using thermate (Thermite + Sulfur) to weaken the large columns of the World Trade Center towers before the main event is discussed, and experiments are conducted to show that thermate can melt steel and cut vertical columns.

    The video presenter – Physics Andreason – believes that it’s impossible for the official story on the collapse of the buildings to be true and advocates for using physical science instead of political science to investigate 9/11.

    00:00:00

    In this section, it is explained that the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s theory that molten metal pouring from the World Trade Center towers was mixed with hot partially burned solid organic materials like furniture and causing the yellow-red color was challenged by independent scientists.

    The theory of NIST that office materials like furniture and computers, which are less dense than molten aluminum, would float on it, is also problematic.

    Independent scientists suggested that some type of thermite material may have been part of the towers and found direct video evidence, eyewitness accounts, forensic evidence, photographic evidence, and tangible evidence of temperatures high enough to melt steel.

    The discovery of explosive red/gray chips positively identified as nano-thermite or super-thermite confirms what the independent scientists had been saying all along.

    Nonetheless, NIST refused to test for explosives or its residue and ignored standards such as NFPA 921 guidelines, leading to the attack of all evidence of thermite material found.

    00:05:00

    In this section of the video, the Great Thermate Debate is discussed, which questions whether thermite material can melt or cut steel, and take massive quantities to cause any real damage.

    Engineers and independent researchers conduct experiments to determine if thermate could weaken a connection or wide flange beams, using small quantities of old-fashioned thermate, which is legal and readily available.

    The experiments involved building a container that could hold the thermite long enough to melt the steel without melting itself, resulting in a successful sliced vertical cut.

    The experiment suggests that thermate can melt steel and cut vertical columns, which raises questions about why incendiaries like thermate and not high explosives were used in 9/11.

    00:10:00

    In this section, Physics Andreason discusses the possibility of using thermate to weaken the large columns of the World Trade Center towers before the main event, but explains that it may take longer to achieve the desired effect, which would explain why we see molten steel several minutes before its final destruction.

    Physics Andreason uses a small amount of thermate to demonstrate how it can be focused on a wide flange to reduce its thickness, and mentions the politically correct terms like pressure pulses and dust puffs used by NIST to possibly obfuscate any mention of explosions.

    Overall, Physics Andreason believes that it’s impossible for the official story on the collapse of the buildings to be true and advocates for using physical science instead of political science to investigate 9/11.

    YouTube Video